Killing Haramb Case Summary

455 Words1 Page

Harambe, an innocent seventeen year-old Silverback gorilla, was shot recently at the Cincinnati Zoo. What was the reason? He was simply acting like a gorilla. Zoo officials made the decision to shoot him when a four year-old boy fell ten feet into the gorilla enclosure and was soon in danger. He could not be sedated because it could take up to twenty minutes for such an enormous animal to be knocked out. Zoo officials made the right decision in killing Harambe, but the one to blame for his tragic death is the mother of the child. The issue here is the lack of responsibility and attentiveness when it comes to the mother of the child. How could any mother let her four year-old child fall into a wild animal enclosure? It is ironic how someone …show more content…

There must have been a significant amount of time for the child to get through the barriers independently. Because of the mother’s lack of attention, a severely endangered animal was killed and she also put her son’s life at risk. Harambe is clearly the victim in this case because the screaming crowd, mother, and child terrorized him. He was simply using his defense mechanisms because of the agony he was facing. The zoo had no other choice but to shoot the ape in fear of something worse happening to the boy. Ultimately, it is the gorilla that had to pay the price and no money or science can bring his precious life back. On May 28th, 2016 an incredibly endangered Silverback gorilla lost its life because of the lack of responsibility of a mother, and this is something that you cannot bring back. The bottom line is that the mother should have been more responsible of her child especially in a place where wild animals roam. The amount of time the child was away from its mother had to be significant since he had enough time to find his way to get through strong barriers. Zoo officials made the right decision in killing Harambe but the one to blame for his tragic death is the mother of the

Open Document