Killer Angels Analysis

1203 Words3 Pages

The Killer Angles The novel The Killer Angels by Michael Shaara depicts the story behind one of the most significant and bloodiest battles of the American Civil War. The Battle of Gettysburg consisted of 51,000-casualties between the Union and Confederate army forces. Mainly focused on letters, journal entries, and memoirs, Shaara tells the story of Gettysburg by using characters from both sides of the “spectrum”, the Confederate and Union army. These characters grasp the revolving points of view about the impending days of the war. Such points are casted from characters, as the confederates own General Lee, General Longstreet, the Unions own Colonel Chamberlain, and soldiers from both sides. From those depicted in the novel, with several …show more content…

“Their differing perceptions of the nature of war form the backbone of the difficult relationship between these two men.” Lee, an older soldier, values more of a strategic and offensive approach, while Longstreet values a defensive warfare approach. Both men consistently argue about which the best option for the confederacy, however, “no matter how much he might disagree, Longstreet defers to Lee’s decisions.” In an argument as of who was right, none of the developed tactics provide any clear evidence as to what was going to work, especially with a military of lesser men, considering the war in 1863. Although General Lee’s tactics did not work during the Battle of Gettysburg, there is no evidence that General Longstreet’s defensive strategy would have worked any better, therefore none can be seen as being right, which kind of debunks Shaara’s depiction of Longstreet’s advanced knowledge of modern warfare. Despite of the importance of the Battle of Gettysburg, often marked as the turning point of the war, General Longstreet should not obey an order that results in a significant loss of men that would be extremely hard to replace at this time. Already limited with the amount of men still able to fight, pushing more forces in an open battle would just nearly deplete the confederate soldiers completely, and because this battle was one that was fought until …show more content…

For example, while the union army is settling for camp, Kilrain informs Chamberlain that a slave has been found which then prompts them into a conversation about such matter. On the topic of race, Kilrain believes that man “cannot judge a race. Any man who judges by the group is a peawit. You take men one at a time, and I have seen a few blacks that earned my respect. A few. Not many. But a few.” Kilrain also suggests that a “freed blacks will turn out no better than many of the whites that are fighting to free them.” Kilrain, a foreigner himself feels an obligation to fight this war to prove to others that “he is a better man than many, whether he is distinctly referring to the blacks is very possible, since the northerners are now worried about freed blacks taking job opportunities

Open Document