Kevin Grier And Tyler Cowen's 'The Economics Of Moneyball'

773 Words2 Pages

The Economics of Moneyball Kevin Grier and Tyler Cowen’s article, “The Economics of Moneyball” is very interesting given that I am a huge sports fan. Tons of people wonder how the economics of Billy Beane’s, “moneyball” works or if it works at all. Before Mr. Beane teams would try to just simply get the best players they could to make the best team as possible. In other words, using the players as supply and the manager’s willingness to buy them at different prices. Billy Beane’s goal was to do this with the least amount of money as possible.
Main Points of Authors In the article the authors write about how Beane used statistics, similar to how a financial economist would to determine value of a product. The authors states, “If such a method …show more content…

ematicians for hire, and so secrets are hard to keep.” (Grier & Cowen, 2011) There are two moneyball theories that the authors write about, “on-base percentage was an undervalued asset and sluggers were overvalued” (Grier & Cowen, 2011) and “is that closers are overrated and overpaid.” (Grier & Cowen, 2011) They go on …show more content…

The first one to come to mind is that it gives insight on what the concept of moneyball really is. The authors tell the reader what it is very fast by stating, “The Moneyball thesis is simple: Using statistical analysis, small-market teams can compete by buying assets that are undervalued by other teams and selling ones that are overvalued by other teams.” I really like how they tell the reader that moneyball has changed the demand for a certain type of athlete. On the contrary the authors could have done some things better in my eyes. Although they told us that moneyball would be “strengthening the hand of the large home-market teams” (Grier & Cowen, 2011), they did not tell us how the demand shifted. What I mean by this is that it does not tell the reader if now sluggers are less valued of if on base percentage is now overvalued. I also believe that the writers could have went deeper into the economics of moneyball rather than just talking about that statistics of

Open Document