Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Teachers rights in public schools
Teachers rights in public schools
Political ideology and its effects
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Summary:
In his argument, “Kenneth Cole Gets Schooled,” David Sirota’s thesis is that Kenneth Cole’s crusade against public schools, teachers, and unions is wrongheaded and ideologically extreme. Supposedly, Cole’s campaign portrays the debate of “Teacher’s Rights vs. Students’ Rights.” However, there are many flaws in the campaign. Sirota states, “[The campaign] is the mirror opposite of how things actually work. Without extending teachers’ rights … it would be difficult … for public schools to recruit the best teacher to the specific at-risk schools that need them the most,” (para. 11.). Analysis: The apparent audience for Sirota’s argument are teachers, parents with children in public schools, and those debating “Teachers’ Rights vs.
Kenneth Cole’s advertisement depicts that teacher unions are defending underachieving teachers by having teachers’ rights vs. students’ rights on the billboard. Teacher unions main focus is
Guggenheim uses those and other devices to inspire action within the masses, and highlight a topic that has been recently shrouded by other problems our nation faces today. He also places blame upon the ‘system’ itself, many reasons add to this conclusion such as refusal to make change, with tenure being the central idea that cripples education.
In “The Teacher Wars”, by Helen Goldstein, the book focuses on the historical implications of school policy and how it affects teachers. The author goes into depth with everything from the rise of female teachers to the rise of technology in today’s teachers. As Goldstein argues teachers have an incredible ability to be able to widen equality, yet can also narrow the achievement gap that is created from birth. Her showcase of the constant strife against teachers throughout the ages gives way to multiple ways politics and decisions affect the achievement gap.
The authors of The Ethics of Teaching, Kenneth A. Strike and Jonas F. Soltis, present ideas about equal opportunity and the democratic community. Kenneth Strike and Jonas Soltis mention what the NEA Code states about discrimination. The NEA states the educator cannot “exclude any student from participating in any program”. (Strike; Soltis, pg. 55). An educator also cannot exclude any student from receiving benefits. Chapter 4 mentions providing equal educational opportunities for every student. Strike and Soltis provide the Brown v. Board of Education as an example of giving equal opportunity to everyone. According to Strike and Soltis, “…segregation is illegal because it does
Doctor Benjamin Barber’s article The Educated Student: Global Citizen or Global Consumer? discusses how the schools are being attacked by advertising campaigns. Barber talks about the poor school districts being targeted by a company called Channel One. Channel One provides these less fortunate schools with computers, televisions, and other technology. In return the schools have to show the students a twelve minute video that contains three minutes of advertising. In my opinion, this means were trading out our textbooks for fashion and material things. I do not believe the upper class schools have to deal with the same inequalities as the lower class schools. Doctor Barber’s intentions in his writings are about educating people about empowering themselves through culture and education. Doctor Barber assumes that 9/11 would empower more people and help produce a better education system. Doctor Barber stated ‘’in the aftermath of 9/11, it was particularly those public-official-citizens. All citizens because in what they do, they are committed to the welfare of their neighbors, their children, to future generations.” (Barber 420). I believe that 9/11 has had more negative effects than positive, and education has not profited from the tragedy that occurred more than ten y...
Even though the Brown v. Board of Education was 62 years ago, African Americans are still fighting to have an equal education opportunity. “But many schools are as segregated today as they were before the ruling, and black children throughout the United States are performing at the bottom of the American educational system” (Jackson 1). Nevertheless, it took decades of hard work and struggle by numerous African Americans for a better education system. Education is the key to success, it gives people the knowledge that they need to strive and become more intelligent thinkers, which leads to more opportunities for them in the job industry. Ever since the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which banned discrimination of any kind, African Americans have every right to have this equal educational opportunity like everyone else. But yet, they were stopped in their tracks by disapproving Americans, who confined the succession of African Americans in the education system. Now that we are in the 21st century, there’s still negligence on black’s education. The black community do not have equal education opportunities because of the lack of funding, poverty experienced by the children in the neighborhoods and society’s views of the black community.
John Taylor Gatto, who was a teacher at the public school for twenty-six years, and the writer of the essay “Against School” that first appeared in Harper’s magazine in 2001, censures and blames the American public school’s educational system in his argumentative essay with various convincible supporting ideas. Gatto argues that the demands of public education system’s schooling are essential problems in “Against School”. Gatto shows some positive examples of the educating without forced schooling and shows models of the ‘success without forced modern schooling’. Indeed, the writer insists that historically forced schooling is not related to intellectual and financial success in American history. James Bryant Conant, who was the twenty-third
...the real world, we need to adopt a modern approach that is proven to work and built to last.” He says that parents, not politicians or bureaucrats, should be in charge of the education dollars spent on their children and that teachers need to be liberated from the politicized, bureaucratic status quo and rewarded for the educational value they create. Robert Sarvis plans on maximizing school choice through public-school matching programs, ending education fads, deregulating private schools and public-school reform, and fostering every aspect of education policy.
...kes examples relatable for high school students to make high school readers more inclined to agree with him. He completes making high school students his primary audience by ending his essay with ideas of how to undermine school administrations and teachers. Gatto’s essay is intended to primarily target parents or to-be parents of public school students. He does this through his examples which help in supporting an argument to informed audiences or audiences with an opposing bias. When he addresses the audience, he also gives advice about how to manage their children’s education. Both methods are effective for their respective audience because they are relatable and use the correct form of argumentation for the bias of the target reader.
In many low income communities, there are teachers that are careless and provide their students with poor quality education. These teachers are there just to make sure that they keep receiving their monthly paychecks and act in this way because they believe that low income students do not have the drive, the passion, or the potential to be able to make something of themselves and one day be in a better place than they are now. Anyon reveals that in working class schools student’s “Work is often evaluated not according to whether it is right or wrong but according to whether the children followed the right steps.” (3). This is important because it demonstrates that low income students are being taught in a very basic way. These children are being negatively affected by this because if they are always being taught in this way then they will never be challenged academically, which can play a huge role in their futures. This argument can also be seen in other articles. In the New York Times
Kozol perceives a war waging between teachers and the public school system (Kozol, 3). Teachers are trapped victims confined to the two purposes public school is attempting to accomplish. Those two goals include “class stratification and political indoctrination” (Kozol, 7). He believes that students should be aware of what is really being taught so they can react accordingly (Kozol, 9).
The Quality of a child’s education often either limits or opens up a world of opportunities. Those who study the purpose of public education and the way it is distributed throughout society can often identify clear correlations between social class and the type of education a student receives. It is generally known by society that wealthy families obtain the best opportunities money can buy. Education is a tool of intellectual and economical empowerment and since the quality of education is strongly influenced by social class, a smaller portion of the American population obtains the opportunities acquired from a top notch education. Many people believe that educational inequalities are perpetuated from the interests of specific classes, but some researchers like John Gatto believe that there are even stronger social forces in play. In the essay “Against Schools” the author John Gatto presents three arguments: (1) that are educational system is flawed, (2) that the American educational system is purposely designed to create a massive working class that is easy to manipulate, and (3) alternative teaching methods should be applied to teach children to think for themselves. In this essay I will be summarizing and relating each of these arguments to other educational essays. Also, I will be discussing the strengths and weaknesses of the author’s argument.
The “Not So Gleeful” case is full of issues that concern the teaching profession - both morally and legally. In analyzing this case I will be using the lens of having knowledge of and understanding of selected laws, regulations and other formal and informal rules which apply to public schooling in Ontario. I will also be using the method outlined in the Allison & Allison article, Working on case studies and other professional problems learned in Week 1 of this 5002 course. My analysis begins by summarizing what the story is about and listing the issues in the case, then leads to identifying and analyzing three important legal issues in depth. The “Not So Gleeful” story is an event that begins with a small crowd of teachers, who are gathered
The budget cuts within educational services are affecting students, teachers and the schools in general in countless ways. First, students are at a heightened disadvantage when there are fewer funds within the field of education. As the amount of money per student continues to decrease in many states, students’ education is being compromised in unfavorable ways (Emeagwali). It is true that when budget cuts force education services to reduce many opportunities for pupils, their learning is often hurt. For example, when a student from a low income family enters a school that is suffering from receiving a high budget allowance, that student, who most likely needs increased attention within the school, is not able to be provided with the education needed to grow to a level equivalent with others of his age because of the removal of extra programs within that school along with overcrowded classrooms forced upon teachers. As a result, the student’s learning is hindered, and they now have to work harder in years later just to try and be at an average level (Feldman). It is not simply a student with a certain background who is being affected by lack of funds within educational services either. Students everywhere are faced with a paucity of opportunities for a sound basic education which damages their constitutional rights, according to Rebell (Rebell, “Safeguarding the Right” 1855). Scarcity of sound basic education for children leads to poor learning habits and needs; therefore, a child’s ability to learn becomes insufficient, which causes difficulties for him in later years of his life (Rebell, “Safeguarding the Right” 1860-61). Despite legislatures claims that fiscal pressure “in no way lessens the constitutional duties [for...
Creativity was allowed, materials were available, direction was more specific, and the teachers over all seemed to show great compassion and care for their students. Both of these studies I believe support the claims made by Bowles & Gintis. Bowles & Gintis' claims were based in the fact that education is inherently unequal among social classes and that the children of these social classes are made ready to give their labor power through schools. Anyon adds to this to say that these are the characteristics of the classrooms and how those characteristics are translated into the social class's workplace. Anyon also adds to the argument that schools adds to the inequality of social classes. Lareau adds to the argument that these social dynamics are so engrained into our everyday lives that most of the time it’s not