Katrina A Pattern Or A Ploy Summary

503 Words2 Pages

Katrina: A Pattern or a Ploy
In a short article, written this past August, Jelani Cobb of the New Yorker, pulls together a pattern seen through decades of New Orleans racism. Through cultural references still relevant today the author built an opinion heavy piece compelling to readers. Cobb, a black book author and professor at the University of Connecticut, often writes provocative race related pieces. This piece while well researched is not without considerable evidential flaws. The points made are bold, however the evidence used to hold them together falls short of allowing any real conclusions.
As an ethical appeal Cobb pulls apart the words “natural disaster” when he defines the circumstances as being created by nature, and the disaster as being created by ill-handling of the results. By separating of the words "natural" and "disaster", he tries to persuade the reader that the fallout of the event was created by the white man and had nothing to do with the effects of the scientific upheaval of seismic activity. He backs this concept up with evidence comparing the Haitian and Japanese earthquakes, and states that “it resulted in fifteen times more fatalities.” While these numbers hold true, these two earthquakes were different magnitudes and the dissimilar geographic …show more content…

With a sweeping claim that the loss of innocence Katrina left Americans with was seen disproportionately between blacks and whites. Using uncited statistics, Cobb appeals pointedly to the reader’s emotions, and leaves them with self-doubt about their own notions of the response to Katrina. The emotional appeal here is carefully masked with statistics, however, this is a naïve logical argument, since it appeals to the prejudices of the readers rather than as a sober assessment of the

Open Document