Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Metaphor in "taming of the shrew
Essay on female oppression
Essay on female oppression
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Metaphor in "taming of the shrew
One of the most wildly debated monologues in Shakespeare’s work is Katherine’s’ ending one from The Taming of the Shrew. Many have understood the final speech to be one of genuine submission while others read it as Katherine having control over the women in the room. It’s my belief, however, that this final speech is just Katherine getting in her two-cents in a way that won’t cause her to be tortured by her husband. Katherine hasn’t been wooed or changed into submission and in my opinion isn’t trying to get the upper-hand with the women in the room. She has been broken and is tired but not changed. Thus, she masks her true intentions with wit and subtext. This theory is supposed by many direct examples from the monologue itself.
Petruchio married Katherine to “tame” her as the title suggests. He subjects her to a series of torturous punishments until she
…show more content…
This, once more, reads as a sarcastic remark at the way Katherine was treated. She speaks of how women are deemed “foul” when they act out against their husbands. This very incident happened to Katherine when she was labeled as a crabby shrew for acting out. She is wittily commenting on her situation here and bringing up a valid point by masking. It appears as though she is saying something along the lines of “if a woman acts out, why she is nothing more than a villain to her husband.” But looking at the subtext I see that it could possibly read as “I acted out and this is how you (Petruchio) treated me for it.” To me, this reads as a masked, witty prod and not a genuine statement, establishment of power, or even a warning. Katherine has been broken but not changed so she still maintains her original ideology. She just doesn’t want to receive more grief by being
find a wife. "I come to wives it wealthy in Padua; If wealthy, then happily in
In Shakespeare's comedy, The Taming of the Shrew, Shakespeare has a woman as one of the story's main characters. Katherine Minola (Kate) is off the wall, and kinda crazy. Because of her actions, the “male centered world” around her doesn't know what to do with her.
Instead of being reserved she speaks her mind with a sharp tongue. In the early stages of the play the suitors witness the personality of their future wife should they choose to court her. After seeing Katherina, Gremio says, “ To cart her, rather. She’s too rough for me.” (I.i 55). Immediately after Katherina says to Baptista, “I pray you sir, is it your will To make a stale of me amongst these mates?” (I.i 57-58). From this small portion of dialogue, one can gather that Gremio thinks Katherina is outspoken making her uncontrollable. In response to Gremio, Katherina faces her father and asks if it is his intention to publicly humiliate her. Katherina shows her repugnance toward the role of women from a man’s perspective when she challenges the intentions of her father. As she indirectly denounces the idea that men are above women Katherina detests being a prop to a man and says it in front of her potential suitors and her
Michael W. Shurgot has written that The Taming of the Shrew "may never be as intellectually stimulating as reading, say, The Merchant of Venice or Hamlet or The Winter's Tale" and that the characters that seem one-dimensional on the page can only become interesting on the stage (328). Shurgot would seem to imply that Shakespeare did not fully develop his characters, and that the play is only entertaining after a director has taken creative license with the stage directions. A close reading of the play itself will show it to be interesting enough indeed, for it reveals clues to the motivation of both Katharina's shrewishness and later submissiveness, and the manner in which her character is to be portrayed and viewed.
"Women have a much better time than men in this world; there are far more things forbidden to them." -Oscar Wilde. This quote embodies the fight over gender roles and the views of women in society. Taming of the Shrew deals with Kate and Bianca, two sisters who are at the time to he married off. However, suitors who seek Bianca as a wife have to wait for her sister to be married first. Kate is seen as a shrew because she is strong willed and unlike most women of the time. In his 1603 play The Taming of the Shrew, William Shakespeare enforces traditional gender roles and demonstrates how little say women had in society. He accomplishes this through the strong personality of Kate, Baptista 's attitude towards his daughters as transactions, and
Katherine reveals this attitude in Act 2 Scene 1, lines 31-35, "nay, now I see she is your treasure, she must have a husband; I must dance barefoot on my wedding day, and for your love for her, lead the apes to hell." Talk not to me, I will sit and weep!.. " This anger is not concealed, it serves to provide motivation as to why a rational person would rebuke Petrucchio so rudely upon first encountering him. Katherine surely realizes that Petruchio is interested in her for ulterior motives other than love. Be it purse that the dowry will bring or the actions of an insincere lunatic who, "woo's a thousand.
In this piece, it can be translated that women would be considered a rebel if she is rude and shrewish to her husband. In all, wives are objects to their husbands, and must do all that her husband says. This limited Katherine’s identity because it took away her personality of being a shrew, and turned her into something she wasn’t; kind and
In Shakespeare's play Taming of the Shrew, the theme of love, marriage, and women’s expectational roles recur often throughout the piece. Shakespeare wrote this play in the 1590’s as one of his early comedies. Around this time, marriage was usually treated as nothing more than a contract; an exchange of cash, goods and persons through written consent. Furthermore, these contracts favored men far above their partners. Women were treated as property; a slave to her husband in a sense, and women who acted otherwise were labeled as “undesirable” or “shrewish”. The way that the relationship between Katherine and Petruchio is handled shows this social construct often throughout the
One character in the play who can be symbolized to the influence of a ‘patriarchal society’ is Petruchio. His cruel judgments upon Katherine’s character was the main reason for her shocking transition. Shakespeare uses his character’s dominance to display the pressure of men on a woman’s freedom of speech. Petruchio acts as the savior to the community who “tames” the shrew Katherine. Like society’s expectations, Petruchio expected Katherine to reform her stubbornness to be his ideal wife. After serious conditioning Katherine’s transformation slowly develops into the norm of being dutiful within a marriage. This is due to Petruchio’s dominance over Katherine’s free will, or basic needs to survive. He takes away Katherine’s freedom to eat, drink and sleep, which represents how society can strip a woman of her decisions to speak, have a career, and dismiss marriage and family ideals for money, because of the need to belong to society, rather than being shunned and independent. Shakespeare expresses Petruchio’s force, “Now, Kate, I am a husband for your turn, Thy beauty doth make me like thee well- Thou must be married to no man but me, for I am he am born to tame you, Kate, and bring you from a wild Kate to Kate, conformable as other household Kates,” (Act 2.1 273-280) this demonstrates his intention to initially control Kate, which is also society’s intention to control a woman’s role in the household. As the play develops, Petruchio’s influence becomes more dormant. Katherine rebellious nature becomes controlled and this is heavily interpreted when Petruchio deprives her of her basic needs to survive just to archive her obedience in Act 4, lines 178-201. He
In Shakespeare's play, Taming of the Shrew, Petruchio does indeed tame Katherina. There are many steps to this process, yet in the end they fall in love. It must also be noted that Katherina tamed Petruchio as well. Petruchio was quite the shrew himself and likely worse of a shrew than Katherina. Petruchio's methods of taming is eccentric- lying, harassing, forcing Katherina to deal with him, chasing, and so much more. He originally wanted to marry Katherina for the money that was likely to acquire from Baptista, Katherina’s father.
...ironic use of manipulation before and after the wedding, Petruchio is able to tame Kate. Or so he thinks. The only real change is that Kate agrees with him, but she only does this to get her way. Therefore she is manipulating him by pretending that he has been able to tame her. He has not tamed her, because she also utilizes the art of manipulation. Before, Kate’s only defense against patriarchy is to be outspoken; now, she negotiates her own sense of power within patriarchy by using manipulation. Shakespeare’s critic of the patriarchal social structure is therefore just, because not only are women denied the same legal power as men, but their manipulative power is also disregarded and considered a weakness. Therefore women are not to be blamed for utilizing this powerful form of control, because that is what the patriarchal social structure forces them into.
The only reason why Katherine is seen as an obscene person is whenever she says to Hortensio “ I’ faith, sir, you shall never need to fear. I wish it is not halfway to her heart. But if it were, doubt not her care should be to comb your noodle with a three-legged stool and paint your face and use you like a fool.” (1.1.62-65) Anyway Katherine is pretty much setting Hortensio straight from any absurd thoughts of her and him ever be wedded together. This was very unusual for any woman to do such a thing in the time period Katherine is living in. Although Katherine was expressing her emotions its till in a vulgar; a third party in this scene and conversation would be Tranio and how he sees how Katherine interacts with a male suitor was shocking. Tranio had said “Husht, master, here’s some good pastime toward. That wench is stark mad or wonderful forward.” This quote expresses a way of how Katherine is far from society standards unlike her sister Bianca who says “Sister content you in my discontent— Sir, to your pleasure humbly I subscribe. My books and instruments shall be my company. On them to look and practice by myself.” (1.1.82-85) The entire speech pretty much sums up how Katherine is supposed to act; someone who is willing to stay calm and agrees to whoever the male figure is in her
In the play The Taming of the Shrew, there are different and unique relationships between two characters throughout the play.These relationships are usually easily distinguishable, as readers can analyze the type of relationship the two characters have since the play is a comedy, so at times these relationships are exaggerated. An intriguing relationship would have to be the one between Katherine and Petruchio, since the circumstances as to how they even got married was rather strange. Katherine displays a rowdy behavior and it is so extreme that men refuse to court her. Their eccentric relationship present in The Taming of the Shrew reflects Shakespeare’s opinion of a normal relationship between a wife and a husband at his time.
The Taming of the Shrew, although written as a comedy, contains certain moral ideas and themes that should not go overlooked. One of these questionable ideas is the actual “Taming” itself. Throughout the story, Petruchio persistently torments Katherine, treating her almost as poorly and terribly as she treats others, in hopes of causing her to surrender to him. This creates such brokenness within Kate that she does eventually submit to Petruchio. Yet one cannot help but question his strategy: Is his cruelty, although she seemingly deserves it, morally right? Another thought that arises is the following: Is Kate actually a different person at the end, or does she simply change her persona in order to evade continuation of Petruchio’s poor treatment? Although perhaps it is difficult to perceive at first, the end result of the “Taming” of the shrewish Kate is genuine.
In The Taming of the Shrew by William Shakespeare, Katherine Minola was a character who dramatically transformed into a brand new person by the end of the book. She was originally an angry, and miserable character, who had no regard for others feelings, and spoke rudely to everyone who took the time to talk to her. During the beginning, her shrewish nature was portrayed throughout every scene she was included in, but by the end she changed into a compliant and agreeable woman and proved that all shrews can change their natures. Three aspects that led to Katherine’s transformation was her desire for love, her forced marriage and Petruchio’s influence upon her life. Katherine sought love in her life because her shrewish nature prevented her from experiencing it previously.