Karen Armstrong A History Of God Summary

1741 Words4 Pages

For thousands of years, devotees of the world’s dominant religions- Judaism, Christianity and Islam- have wrestled with the conception of God. Karen Armstrong, a former Catholic nun, is acclaimed for her work titled A History of God: The 4,000 Year Quest of Judaism, Christianity and Islam, an academic study that guides readers along humanity’s quest to trace the evolution of God. Her theories examine the images of a deity as an idea versus a symbol in religious ethos while demonstrating the interrelation of Christian, Islamic and Jewish understandings of the divine. Although the title is ambitious and demands attention, I will be assessing Armstrong’s ability to articulate each historical academic, the organization of her writing including …show more content…

This would have enhanced the reader’s understanding of her theories; however, the author seems to have overlooked this aspect. To some extent, the author’s poor presentation causes the quality of her work to suffer.
Armstrong drives the quality of her work even further. From ancient philosophies and mysticism to the Enlightenment, and the Reformation, Karen Armstrong poorly arranges the structure of her text. Although the author provides the readers with a chronological order of religious happenings, she exceeds the limit. For an introductory text, the author makes excessive references to various philosophers, reformers and their theories.
Armstrong mentions, “Luria gave a new meaning to the original image of the exile of the Shekinah. It will be recalled that in the Talmud, the Rabbis had seen the Shekinah voluntarily going to exile with the Jews after the destruction of the Temple” (1). As an author, her writing preference seems to be to use numerous examples to validate her theories. Though Armstrong has a lot of knowledge of religious history, she fails to maintain a consistent writing style within her …show more content…

Being a scholar in religious studies we (the readers) hope that Armstrong would introduce new ideologies gradually. Instead, the author makes parts of her text difficult to read by frequently using complex terms and unfamiliar names of scholars. “King Uzziah of Judah had died that year and was succeeded by his son Azha. After the death of King Jeroboam II, five kings had sat on the throne between 746 and 736, while King Tigleth Pilesar III, king of Assyria….” (Armstrong, 40). Her attempt to captivate the reader weakens as the reader may not know anything about the people whom she is referring to. Furthermore, the reader becomes unfocused, struggles to grasp an understanding of key ideas and additional theories. As an author, her writing style relies on the use of numerous examples to validate her theories. But to create a more comprehensible work, Armstrong should have made her book more coherent and relatable to the reader. The use of several examples hurts the reader, in a way that makes religious ideas confusing and, at the same time, boring the reader with these unfamiliar religious

Open Document