Kant's View Of Morality

234 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Immanuel kant views on morality

Kant may have some valid points on the ideas of demands, and their reasonability, however I find it extremely difficult to execute these thoughts in a naturally occurring situation. Kant, for example, believes lying, regardless of the situation, is absolutely immoral and unacceptable. There are instances however, that I would find it completely acceptable to lie in and I would not consider myself an immoral person for doing so. Blackburn goes on to explain how ethics focuses on the “impartial” and “universal” views of morality and I find what he says to be very intriguing. Blackburn explains that we should all be pulling our own weight, but then goes into detail about circumstances in which we break this wall and are forced to help those inferior

Show More
Related

  • Rule Consequentialism And Kantian Ethics

    990 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...l sources of utility or consequences, but about his moral identity and integrity. Jim is presented with a situation that challenges to who he is, and not just simply what he should do. Granted, is tricky to decide on the “right” action in this case because by not partaking in the deal, Jim is staying true to his personal moral beliefs; yet he is still left with the burden of knowing that all twenty of the Indians would be killed without his interference. One could also argue that Jim would only be contributing to the problem if he too committed such acts against these innocent people and it is his duty as a moral being to not partake. It seems that Kant’s theory passes the standard of internal support and explanatory power. This is because his principles are able to fit with considered moral beliefs and are able to help individuals identify a right and wrong action.

    Read More

  • Pretty Demanding Dictate

    1580 Words  | 4 Pages

    Now, against Unger’s Pretty Demanding Dictate, there might be conflicting views proposed by the defenders of Murphy and Cullity. Murphy and Cullity would both agree that Unger’s Pretty Demanding Dictate is too demanding on us and therefore should have a limit at which point we become free from moral obligations. However, each author holds a different reason for supporting this over-demanding objection; Murphy argues for fairness as a constraint on moral obligation while Cullity argues for self-interest as a constraint.

    Read More

  • Analysis of Immanuel Kant´s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals

    926 Words  | 2 Pages

    Immanuel Kant is a popular modern day philosopher. He was a modest and humble man of his time. He never left his hometown, never married and never strayed from his schedule. Kant may come off as boring, while he was an introvert but he had a great amount to offer. His thoughts and concepts from the 1700s are still observed today. His most recognized work is from the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Here Kant expresses his idea of ‘The Good Will’ and the ‘Categorical Imperative’.

    Read More

  • Revolution: Locke vs Kant

    2600 Words  | 6 Pages

    ...o be an unbearable abuse of supreme authority” or in the face of governmental tyranny. However, Kant also outlines in his other work the importance of moral autonomy, which seems to betray his view of a citizen's duty to obey. As Arntzen states: “by denying a right of resistance even when civil society falls short of the ideal civil society, he maintains that one has a duty to act according to a will that is not one's own, and thereby seems to betray the person's autonomy and dignity he has so strongly asserted in GMS and KpV” (Arntzen: 1996). Arntzen then goes on to state that Kant must allow

    Read More

  • Global Poverty: Peter Singer, And Immanuel Kant

    1568 Words  | 4 Pages

    I will also articulate my positions regarding proposals from John Arthur, Peter Singer, and Immanuel Kant. John Arthur, an American philosopher, states that “this idea can be expressed rather awkwardly by the notion of entitlements, by which I have in mind the thought that having either a right or justly deserving something can also be important as we think about our obligations to others.” The other side of the coin would be the views of Peter Singer, an Australian moral philosopher, states that “...if it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought, morally, to do it.” Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher, believes that “The practical necessity of acting on this principle -- that is, duty -- is not based on at all on feelings, impulses, and inclinations, but only on the relation of rational beings to one another, a relation in which the will of a rational being must be regarded as lawgiving, because otherwise it could not be thought of as an end in

    Read More

  • Kant vs. Mill: Human Rights and Utilitarianism

    1725 Words  | 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral philosophy is built around the formal principles of ethics rather than substantive human goods. He begins by outlining the principles of reasoning that can be equally expected of all rational persons regardless of their individual desires or partial interests. It creates an ideal universal community of rational individuals who can collectively agree on the moral principles for guiding equality and autonomy. This is what forms the basis for contemporary human rig...

    Read More

  • Metaphysics of Morals

    1153 Words  | 3 Pages

    ... value through discussing duty in light of a priori and experience. In conclusion, he suggests that because actions depend on specific circumstances, a priori beliefs cannot be extracted from experience. People’s experiences and actions are based on circumstantial motivations; thus they can’t conform to categorical imperatives either because categorical imperatives are principles that are intrinsically good and must be obeyed despite the circumstance or situation. Kant concludes that rational beings are ends in themselves and that principle is a universal law, which comes from reason and not experience.

    Read More

  • Groundwork For Metaphysics Of Morals Essay

    344 Words  | 1 Pages

    After reading the Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, I would say I agree with Kant’s philosophies on morals to a certain extent. I think he makes a lot of good points, but I don’t completely agree that there are never any exceptions to the categorical imperative in deciding what is moral. The way I understood what he was saying is that for something to be truly moral it must be done out of duty, and not for desires or emotions. He says the universal imperative of duty is “Act as though the maxim of your action were to become, through your will, a universal law of nature” (24). This to me means that if it were okay for everyone to act a certain way all the time then the action would be moral. Kant says that actions that are done for a

    Read More

  • World Hunger And Utilitarianism

    1808 Words  | 4 Pages

    Kantians believe that we should avoid treating others as mere means.(877) In other words we should not make false promises, physically force a person to do what we want, use threats, or take advantage of someone’s desperate situation and make unjust offers.(877-878) These are examples of treating people as mere means because these people will not have the opportunity to make a reasonable choice for themselves. Either because they don’t have the complete information, their wellbeing is on the line, or simply because there is no just offer on the table. We are also to treat others as an end in themselves(878), meaning that we have to respect their autonomy, and their freedom to make choices for themselves. But according to O’Neil it’s not enough to treat others as an end in themselves. In her duty of beneficence she argues that we cannot treat others as end in themselves if they have limited rationality or autonomy (878-879). She derives her idea from Kant’s idea of imperfect duty which aims to promote helping others to reach their potential.(). Therefor based on these principles it makes sense for us to help reduce world famine, because the people affected by this issues are very venerable, and their autonomy is undermined. The only way to ensure that they are treated as rational human beings is if we helped them. It’s important to

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant's Theory of Judgment

    945 Words  | 2 Pages

    What are, and what are the differences between, judgments of perception and judgments of experience for Kant?

    Read More

  • Kant's Three Propositions Of Morality

    1337 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the reading of “Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals,” Kant mentions that there are three propositions of morality. He then continues on to indicate that our actions can either be done out of duty or out of desire. Afterwards, Kant generates that our maxiums are a fraction of our actions and it turns into a universal law. In this essay, I shall explain what Kant means by “I can also will that my maxim should become a universal law”(Prompt). Also, how it corresponds to the first proposition, which Kant states, which is an action must be from moral duty. Moreover, I will also be providing an example of the first proposition.

    Read More

  • Essay On Grounding For The Metaphysics Of Morality By Immanuel Kant

    1400 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant argues that human beings inherently have capability to make purely rational decisions that are not based on inclinations and such rational decisions prevent people from interfering with freedom of another. Kant’s view of inherent ability to reason brings different perspective to ways which human beings can pursue morality thus it requires a close analytical examination.

    Read More

  • David Hume And Immanuel Kant On Morality

    1611 Words  | 4 Pages

    One of the earliest groundworks for morality stem from the teachings within the Bible. It is written that “What comes out of a person is what defiles him. For from within, out of the heart of man, come evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery, coveting, wickedness, deceit, sensuality, envy, slander, pride, foolishness. All these evil things come from within, and they defile a person” (Mark 7:20-23). Interpretations of this verse yield the conclusion that if immorality comes from within, then righteousness and morality comes from without- from God. This explanation of morality was accepted for thousands of years, so when philosophers

    Read More

  • Kant 's Three Propositions Of Morality

    1593 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Foundation of the Metaphysics of Morals Immanuel Kant presents three propositions of morality. In this paper I am going to explain the first proposition of morality that Kant states. Then I will assert a possible objection to Kant’s proposition by utilizing an example he uses known as the sympathetic person. Lastly, I will show a defense Kant could use against the possible objection to his proposition.

    Read More

  • Justice: What's The Right Thing To Do?

    668 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to the video, Justice: What's The Right Thing To Do? Episode 06: "MIND YOUR MOTIVES", the speaker uses Immanuel Kant’s ethical approach, which rejects Utilitarian approach. Kant embodies the approach as, all human beings have dignity, and all rationale beings are capable of reason or a capacity for reason, acting by choosing freely to determine the end itself. This approach is an instrument to what the individual pursues (Harvard, 2008). The concept differs from the Utilitarian approach as the ends are more of the duty and the action is morally worthy. Kant’s idea is represented as an action of the administrator, that one shouldn’t act on motives you would not want to be universal law. The reason for action must be made on the moral judgement, on the nature of the action, where the costs of the outcomes are

    Read More

More about Kant's View Of Morality

Open Document