Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The case of lawrence v texas analysis
The case of lawrence v texas analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The case of lawrence v texas analysis
For many years there has been a controversy between two states, Kansas and Nebraska. It initially started in 1999 and is continuing to this day. The water issue between the two states is a dispute concerning the water rights agreement that was signed back in 1943. This agreement was the Republican River compact agreement. Each state was agreed to receive a certain amount of the river water, 49 percent of the river’s water to Nebraska, 40 percent to Kansas, and 11 percent to Colorado (Rosales). The purpose of this compact is to 1). Provide for equitable division of such waters; 2). Remove all causes of controversy; 3). Promote interstate comity; 4). Promote joint action by the states and the United State in the efficient use of water and …show more content…
Kansas Department of Agriculture, Colorado Division of Water Resources, Nebraska Association of Resources Districts, and University of Nebraska College of Law are some of the main institutions. Kansas Department of Agriculture has the Division of Water Resources within the department and it governs the use of the state’s water, regulates the construction of dams, levees and other changes being made to the streams. Since the dispute has to deal with the stream that runs through Nebraska and Kansas they have to be involved. The Division of Water Resources is one of many different agencies managing the Kansas’ water resources. Colorado Division of Water Resources is within the Colorado Department of Natural Resources and it has the same involvement as the Kansas Department of Agriculture. It is responsible for the development, protection, and enhancement of the natural resources that are in the state of Colorado. The Colorado Division of Water Resources administer water rights, issue well water permits, and also represents the state in the interstate compact water. Nebraska Association of Resources helps the state’s natural resources districts approach these issues in a coordinated effort…works hand-in-hand with districts on basin-wide issues… the Republican River lawsuit with Kansas (Nebraska Natural Resources …show more content…
"Paying Farmers to Not Irrigate." Farming from 1970’s to today. Wessels Living History Farm, 2009. Web. 07 May 2015.
Gerlock, Grant. "Farmers Feeling Heat in Republican River Dispute." Farmers Feeling Heat in Republican River Dispute. Harvest Public Media, 9 Aug. 2012. Web. 07 May 2015.
Hendee, David. "Kansas' Accusation That Nebraska Violated Republican River Pact Lands at U.S. Supreme Court." Omaha.com. N.p., 13 Oct. 2014. Web. 7 May 2015.
Keller, David. "Court-Appointed Special Masters: Dispute-Resolvers?" Mediate.com. Mediate.com, n.d. Web. 07 May 2015.
Parker, Glenn L. "Kansas-Nebraska-Colorado Republican River Compact 1943." Kansas Department of Agriculture. Department of Agriculture, 2012. Web. 7 May 2015.
Rosales, Daniel, and Rose N. Petoskey. "Kansas v. Nebraska and Colorado." Legal Information Institute. Cornell Law, n.d. Web. 07 May 2015.
Soronen, Lisa. "Supreme Court Resolves Water Rights Interstate Compact Dispute between Kansas and Nebraska." The Council of State Governments Knowledge Center. The Council of State Governments, 2013. Web. 7 May 2015.
Tart, Keith. "The Republican River Compact: Will Kansas and Nebraska Ever Co-Exist?"University of Denver Water Law Review at the Sturm College of Law Comments. University of Denver, 5 Jan. 2015. Web. 07 May
Going forward, the Court of Appeal’s decision in Garetson Brothers v. American Warrior will stand for the proposition that Kansas water laws mean what they say. Rather than consider any economic considerations, the only relevant factors will be who has the senior water right and whether an impairment has occurred. As groundwater becomes scarcer in Kansas, senior water users will likely find that Kansas laws will serve to protect their use over any junior water
The positive aspects of ‘Lake’ Powell are few yet noteworthy. Glen Canyon Dam’s hydroelectric power-plant generates one thousand three hundred mega watts of electricity at full operation. That is enough power to supply three hundred fifty thousand homes. Glen Canyon Dam holds twenty seven million acre feet of water, which is equivalent to twice the Colorado River’s annual flow (Living Rivers: What about the hydroelectric loss?). One of the most valuable reasons for the dam to remain active is that “Lake Powell generates four hundred fifty five million dollars per year in tourist revenue, without this cash inflow, gas-and-motel towns . . . would undoubtedly wilt, and surrounding counties and states would lose a substantial tax base” (Farmer 185). These positive aspects are of no surprise considering they are the reason dams are built in the first place.
"Summary of the Decision." Landmark Cases Of The U.S Supreme Court. Street Law, Inc, n.d. Web. 1 Nov. 2013. .
"Key Supreme Court Cases: Schenck v. United States - American Bar ..." 2011. 14 Jan. 2014
Ganzel,Bill “farming in the 1930s” Wessels living history farms. 2003. Web. 19 Nov. 2013 http://www.livinghistoryfarm.org/farminginthe30s/farminginthe1930s.html
" Schenck v. United States. Chicago-kent College of law , n.d. Web. 6 Jan. 2014.
The Missouri Compromise acted as a balancing act among the anti-slave states and the slave states. Since states generally entered the union in pairs, it stat...
"SOSSAMON III v. LONE STAR STATE OF TEXAS VI VI." Findlaw. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 May 2014.
U.S. Supreme Court. (1940). State of Wyoming v. State of Colorado (309 U.S. 572 (1940), No. 10) from
LAWRENCE V. TEXAS. 478 U. S. 186 :: Volume 478 :: 1986 :: Full Text." US Supreme Court Cases from Justia & Oyez. .
On December 14, 1853, Augustus C. Dodge of Iowa introduced a bill in the Senate. The bill proposed organizing the Nebraska territory, which also included an area that would become the state of Kansas. His bill was referred to the Committee of the Territories, which was chaired by Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois.
The 1920’s were the singularly most influential years of farming in our country. The loss of farms following the war, and new agricultural practices resulted in the dawn of modern agriculture in our country. The shift from small family to big corporation during this time is now the basis for how our society deals with food today. Traditional farming in the 1920’s underwent a series of massive transitions following WWI as the number of farms decreased and the size of farms increased.
State V. Fisher. Wisconsin Supreme Court. 17 May 2006. LexisNexis Academic. Web. 04 May 2014. .
Hall, Kermit L, eds. The Oxford guide to United States Supreme Court decisions New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Edgar V. Roberts and Henry E. Jacobs. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. Prentice Hall 2004.