Justice For Sale Essay

It is improbable to assume that you can truly abolish subjectivity, based on the notion that everyone has a different background. However, evident bias from judges is not necessarily a bad thing. The question “Justice for sale?” raised by Mr M. Cann is interesting and it is a point in the case against judicial elections. There was evidence of a correlation between campaign contributions and the judges’ procedure in court . However, it must not be forgotten that endless factors could have influenced the judgments, not solely the campaign contributions. The abovementioned example originated from the United States, which shows the potential dangers of judicial election. Furthermore, economic conditions can influence more than internal factors. In England and Wales there

Where as, the appointed judges of the UK used the bias to aid the society, but economic condition is not the only influence. Political factors are another point. To promote judicial independence and objectivity, politics should be removed from the equation. In the 2005 Constitutional Reform Act, this separation was enforced when the law lords was expelled from the House of Lords. Politics can still influence judgment in the UK, but it’s discouraged. Elections of the judiciary are encouraging political and judges to work together, as they have to clarify their political position during their campaign. Furthermore, under the rule of law, transparency of the law is of great importance. However, in this case as people would be aware of the judges predisposition, it would be transparency of the potential interpretation of the law and not the law itself. Furthermore, the same sort of evidence, as explored in economic conditions becomes a factor. Again, evidence from the US shows that elected judges during re-election terms will grant success in litigation to influential people