Jungian Psychology Vs Buddhism Research Paper

951 Words2 Pages

Throughout Buddhism and Jungian psychology there are numerous unions of opposites. In Buddhism, there are the opposites of male and female, matter and spirit, active and passive, wisdom (the discriminating principle) and compassion (the unifying principle). In Jungian psychology, opposition is inherent in the psyche, the basic pairs of opposites are the conscious and the unconscious. Consciousness represents individuality while unconsciousness represents the nonduality (not two or one undivided without the other used to define various strands of religious and spiritual thought). Consciousness and unconsciousness are complementary to each other and to deny one another is to bring about disequilibrium and the loss of being whole. Jung has stated …show more content…

According to the Middle Way, the way to find the truth is not through any system of understanding but by rising above exclusiveness. Conflict can be avoided by awareness of the whole rather than the separate parts, going beyond intuition to the nondual knowledge, the knowledge of the rea and absolute. The basic philosophy of this concept is the distinction between the mundane and the ultimate truth, where the mundane is transformed and seen in a different light. One other thing that Buddhism and psychology share, is the living experience, when one gains experience through life. One’s life experiences are very important to the processes of enlightenment and achieving the …show more content…

This may be seen as a negative point due to the fact that Buddhism developed in the East and psychology developed in the West. With both being practiced in both hemispheres, there are more chances for the two to connect and people could argue that there are too many chances for a connection and since the two subjects come from different sides of the world, there could never be a possibility for the two to connect and understand one another. “Some of the most notable differences revolved around the concepts of ‘individualism’ and ‘collectivism’; whether you consider yourself to be independent and self-contained, or entwined and interconnected with the other people around you, valuing the group over the individual. Generally speaking - there are many exceptions - people in the West tend to be more individualist, and people from Asian countries like India, Japan or China tend to be more collectivist” (Robson, “How East and West Think in Profoundly Different Ways”). Generally, Eastern countries revolve around the concept of collectivism and tend to entwine and close to those around them. Western countries to be individualistic, preferring to be independent and having a-do-it-yourself attitude. When considering this concept, it can be understood why some may say it would be complicated to intertwine Buddhism and

Open Document