Julius Caesar Tragic Hero Essay

The concept of a “tragic hero” dates back more than 2,000 years, and is attributed to the Greek philosopher Aristotle. Tragedy was defined as a genre of theater with a protagonist that followed an almost formulaic path to ruin or grief because of a character flaw. These heroes are of noble stature, have a “tragic flaw,” experience recognition and reversal, undergo an underserved downfall that brings about something positive in the grand scheme of things, and cause the audience to experience a “catharsis” as they empathize with them. A tragic hero exhibits the theme of humans, not the gods, being held responsible for their actions and the consequences of choices. William Shakespeare used this Greek definition of tragedy as a model for his plays. The character of Brutus from Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar is, today, one of the most well known tragic heroes. Throughout the play,

Brutus’ pure intentions led to the utmost punishment: the deaths his wife and friends, being forced to leave Rome, and eventually losing even his own life. Antony, although Brutus’ downfall, realizes that Brutus had a good heart the entire time, saying “All the conspirators save only he did that they did in the envy of great Caesar. He only in a general honest thought and common good to all, made on of them” (V.v.75-78). Antony, as do the audience and as will Rome, knows that Brutus killed Julius Caesar only because he thought it was the right thing to do, not for any selfish reason. In the end, Brutus’ death brings about what he wanted- peace in Rome. As Octavius says “So call the field to rest, and let’s away to part the glories of this happy day,” (V.v.86-87) Rome is celebrating, has gained order, and the citizens are happy. The purpose of Brutus going through these trials in the first place is fulfilled, and our tragic hero can finally