Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

1352 Words3 Pages

Julius Caesar is a play of tragedy written by William Shakespeare. It takes place in 450 B.C. in Rome, Italy. The play doesn’t begin until after Caesar defeated his ex-friend, Pompey, and returned to Rome. At his return, Caesar is offered the crown of Rome three times by his loyal friend, Marc Antony, but denies it each time. A group of people who were jealous of Caesarś success, the conspirators, wanted him dead. After building their side, the conspirators stopped Caesar from going to the capitol in Act III and stabbed him leaving thirty-three wounds in his body. At Caesar’s funeral Brutus, an ex-friend, and Marc Antony gave speeches that indubitably affected the people of Rome. Who gave the better speech using rhetorical strategies to …show more content…

This is where everything falls apart. Brutus used a lot of rhetorical strategies in his speech. He uses ethos to give himself credibility on being honorable and “saving Rome” from the rule of Julius Caesar. He says, “Not that I love Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.” Appealing to emotion is what got the audience to see that Brutus wouldn’t lie and that he meant well for what he did. Brutus offers himself as a sacrifice to Rome if him killing Caesar offended and hurt them so much. Questioning and reasoning were also used in his speech. He asks the audience who has he offended and who would not kill for his country for the good of all. Antony’s speech was different in the way his words flowed together. The use of pathos and logos were a huge part of his speech. Fear tactics were used to reverse what Brutus said and say it effortlessly to get the people of Rome to see the truth. Words like honor and Caesar’s name were used throughout the speech. The word honor is used to show to that if you are honorable and true, why did you kill somebody. Caesar’s name held weight in Act III, so his name alone got the people of Rome to see the Caesar is indeed the victim, not Rome itself. Name calling was also used. With Antony calling the names of the conspirators that killed Caesar and showing where their sword went makes everyone see that Brutus tried covering for everyone and was willing to take the blame and his life, but this …show more content…

In Scene 1 of Act III Brutus thinks that Marc Antony would be on their side in a way that Cassius had convinced Brutus to be on their side. After the talk with Antony about the death of Caesar in Scene 1, he confronts the people of Rome and tells them Caesar died for his ambition as Cassius told him in the letters from Act II. The speech Brutus gave reflected a change that Cassius gave him, not a change that he did himself. Act IV and V was a major downfall in Brutus’ life, literally. In Act IV Brutus tell Cassius about the death of his wife Portia who committed suicide with fire. This is where Brutus realizes that his whole life is in this battle he is about to have with Antony and Octavius. After debating with Cassius who has had more military experience than Brutus in Act IV, they march their troops on to fight Antony. In Act V scene 3, the death of Cassius hit Brutus bad. He blames the ghost of Caesar that visited him In Act IV Scene 3 the night before they head to Philippi. Encouraging the troops to keep fight was all that Brutus could do at the moment. His life was gone, his whole life was dead and he had nothing to live for at the moment. Committing suicide was the only option in his mind. In Act V Scene 5 was when Brutus committed suicide and took his last breath. Antony, however, changed dramatically throughout the play. In Act III Scene 1 Antony promises Brutus not to blame anyone for

Open Document