Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

990 Words2 Pages

It takes a lot of things to prove those to have wit, yet only one thing to prove another is ignorant. In the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, written by William Shakespeare, Marc Antony presents a heart wrenching speech in the name of Julius Caesar to the Roman people. In doing this, he challenges the ideas and reasoning for murdering Julius Caesar presented by Brutus, which in turn, sways the people’s trust and faith away from Brutus himself. His powerful words bring the people to rebel against Brutus and other conspirators with violence and brutality. Therefore, in his acclamation, Marc Antony uses skilled rhetoric and several persuasive techniques to build his credibility and appeal to the Roman citizens to fuel their rebellion against …show more content…

In his speech, Mark Antony claims that he “thrice presented [Caesar] a kingly crown,” and Caesar refused it each time (JC 3.2.93-93). This use of factual evidence directly negates Brutus’s obscene reason for killing Caesar and gives the illusion that Caesar cared more about the people than he did about the throne. This solid evidence shared to the Plebeians makes them not only guilty for believing Brutus’s explanation for killing Caesar, but also the sense of resentment towards the conspirators as there was no legitimate reason for doing so. As the speech continues, Mark Antony states that Caesar was “[his] friend, faithful and just to [him]” (JC 3.2.81-82). From the description Mark Antony shares to them, Caesar was a noble man, suggesting that the people of Rome should all righteously mourn for his death. Antony’s comments about Caesar are meant to draw the audience’s attention to Caesar’s righteous qualities and to view him as the man they once knew and loved. Later into the speech, Mark Antony reveals the dead body of Julius Caesar to the citizens of Rome, pointing out the “place [where] Cassius’ dagger [ran] through” and disclosing each and every wound (JC 3.2.171-172). Through showing the mutilated body of Caesar, Mark Antony emphasizes the brutality of Caesar’s killing and the content of the conspirators as they watched him die. Seeing Caesar’s mutilated body and hearing Antony’s graphic description of the killing had the sole purpose of appealing to the Plebeian’s emotions, which fuels their shame, grief and growing hostility towards the conspirators. Through Antony’s words and actions, the people of Rome not only experience the brutality of Caesar’s death, but also the feelings of guilt for trusting Brutus. Krystyna Kujawinska- Courtney

Open Document