1 Caesar a Tragic HeroCaesar ended up doing something that partly defines him as a person and that would be he could no let go of something and that he just had to do something about it, which what he did was worse than them taking him hostage. This is a direct quote from the first site I went on, "Caesar made good on that threat. He had the pirates' throats slit before crucification, however, in a show of leniency owing their easy treatment of him in capyivity. This determination of Caesar's, to do exactly what he said he would do, become one of his defining characteristics throughout his life." Caesar should have never taken lives of people yes I know it was wrong for the pirates to take a person hostage and he may have prevented anyone …show more content…
Victorious in Spain, Caesar then sailed to Macedonia, but he could not dislodge Pompey from his base at Dyrrachium (modern Durazzon). Caesar finallyraised the seige, fell back into genral Greece, and defeated Pompey, who had pursued him, at the Battle of Pharsalus in 48 b,c."This is what i found from the third link, "Gaius Cassius Longinus and Marcus Junius Brutus, former enemies of Julius Caesar who'd joined the Roman Senate, led Caesar's assassination, dubbing themselves 'the liberators." "After Caesar's victor, Brutus was encouraged to join the government. His mother, Servilla, was also one of Caesar's lovers." Every superhero has eneimies after they make one mistake people will look at you differently, it can be ffor better or worse. "The strategic political alliance among Julius Caesar, Marcus Licinius Crassus and Pompey came to be known as The First Triumvirate." "In an early centroversial Move, Caesar tried to pay off Pompey's soldiers by granting them public lands. Caesar hired some of Pompey's soldiers to stage a riot. In the midst of all the chaos, he got his way." "On January 10 to 11, 49 BC, Caesar led troops accross the river Rubican. As Pompey further aligned himself with nobility, who increasingly saw Caesar as a national threat, civil was between the two leaders proved to be invitable. In the end, however, Pompey and his troops were no match for Caesar's military campaign. By late 48 BC, Caesar had pushed his enemies out of Italy and pursued Pompey …show more content…
But he was seen by some as a cruel man ssolely driven by expanding his own personal power. As a result, he made enemies of important politicians in Rome itself. Some senior army generals, such as Pompey, were also very concerned abou Caesar's intentions." "Caesar ignored this law, crossed the Rubican and advanced to confront his enemies in Rome. The Senate consideredthis to be a treasonable offense but there was little they could do. Caesar had a very powerful and experienced army and his opponets were frightened. Pompey was killed in Egypt in 48 BC. For the next three years he picked off his enemies one by one whether they were in North Africa, The Middle East or Europe." " Caesar did not take away their wealth and these men plotted agaianst him." Caesar took a choice that no one could stop him from making and it shoud not have been done in that way, but it was so he had to make the best of it in his ownway. I do not think Caesar should of killed his enemies maybe put them in jail, butI am not sue of they had one back in those days. " " Our tryant deserved to die Here was a man who wanted to be king of the Roman people and master of the whole world. Those who agree with an ambition like this must also accept the destruction of existing laws and freedoms. It is not right or fair to want to be king in a state that used to be free and ought to be free today." Cecero." This is a person who did not agree with Caesar did or the people who followed him, so there for
In this case, the rise of Caesar’s power was considered by some as disregard and disrespect of authority, tradition, and Roman rules. Caesar on many occasions challenged Roman commander Pompey and his main opponent, thus leading to many civil wars. Additionally, his decision to cross Rubicon was contrary to the Roman law that restricted him to enter Rome because he was a governor of Gaul at the time. Additionally, following Pompey’s death, Caesar conferred more powers to himself by diluting the Senate’s reaches and powers (Alvin 82). One major flaw that Caesar possessed was his strong ambition. This made him overconfident and thought he had become invincible both in Rome and battle. Because his soldiers respected and loved him, Caesar thought that he would pursue whatever he desired. This is what led to his
Julius was born from Aurelia and Gaius Julius Caesar. His family had nobility status, although they were neither rich nor influential in the time period. Caesar was made military tribune before 70 B.C. and was quaestor in Farther Spain in 69 B.C. he helped Pompey to obtain the supreme command for the war in the East. As a general, Caesar was the best Rome had ever seen. He returned to Rome in 68 B.C. and in Pompey's absence was becoming the recognized head of the popular party. His love of Marius and Cinna made him popular with the people, but earned him the hatred of the senate. In Dec. 63 B.C. Caesar advocated mercy for Catiline and the conspirators, thereby increasing the enmity of the senatorial party and its leaders, Cato the Younger and Quintus Lutatius Catulus.
In “The Assassination of Julius Caesar, 44 BC ” Julius Caesar is perceived as a dictator. He pursues his political enemy, Pompey from Greece to Egypt and defeated the legions loyal to Pompey
First of all, Caesar always felt entitled to himself and always had the audacity to see everyone as beneath him. A great example of Caesar’s bravery and fearlessness is when he was eighteen and was escape the punishment from the dictator Sulla, so in the process he was captured by pirates, who decided to be help for ransom. “When they demanded twenty talents for his ransom, he laughed at them for not knowing who he was, and spontaneously promised to give them fifty talents instead, Next after he had dispatched friends to various cites to gather the money…he felt so superior to them that whenever he wanted to sleep, he would order them to be quiet” . Even being surrounded by murderous pirates clearly out numbered, he refused to let them think that they were in charge while he was in their captivity for thirty-eight days.
Caesar was popular among the citizens because he had created a stable government and did a lot for the city of Rome. Roman senators were scared that Caesar was beginning to have too much power so they murdered him. Following his death, Caesar’s friends and family wanted revenge. His cousin, Marcus Antonius, friend, Marcus Aemilius Lepidus, and nephew, Gaius Octavius Thurinus, also known as Octavian, joined forces to form the Second Triumvirate. Similar to the men in the First Triumvirate, these three men were also aggressive and seeking more power. Immediately after they rose to power, Lepidus was granted Hispania and Africa to rule over, which made him satisfied and out of the affairs in Rome. Octavian and Antonius agreed that Octavian would rule the west and Antonius the east but because of Antonius’ connection with Queen Cleopatra, Octavian was disappointed with the unbalance. This feud eventually led up to another civil war when Antonius, along with Cleopatra’s army, went into war with Octavian and his army. Octavian came out victorious and Antonius and Cleopatra both decided to commit suicide. With Octavian in power, he send Lepidus into exile and changed his name to
Julius Caesar (100-44 BC) was one of the most outstanding leaders in history. He was the first ruler of the Romano-Hellenic civilization and achieved his goals with great success throughout his life of 56 years. He was assassinated by the conspirators, who accused him for practicing tyranny. This essay will discuss whether it was right for the conspirators to murder Caesar and what its consequences were.
Expository Essay The decisions that one man makes can determine the length of life. Rome has many people that have the characteristics to be great leaders. Antony is a manipulative man, Brutus is an honorable man, and Octavius is a quiet strength. All three men would do an excellent job in leading Rome. Antony is a manipulative man. This is shown throughout the play in several cases, but most prominently at Caesar’s funeral. “I thrice presented him a kingly crown which he did thrice refuse. Was this ambition?” (III, ii, 96-96). Antony is very cleaver in the way that he presents his case to the people. He uses rhetorical questioning to show the people that Caesar was in fact not ambitious.
and Caesar, ^I saw Mark Antony offer him a crown (yet ^twas not a crown
Brutus murdered Caesar with honorable purpose so that the Roman people would not “die all slaves”, but “live [as] freemen” (117). Caesar’s death was believed to be in the best interest of Rome and a necessary loss to the empire. Brutus did not seek glory or power, but stability for Rome (unlike most of the conspirators). The Tragic Hero makes an ethical decision, in which the repercussion of his choice was the bringing forth of his own downfall. Brutus did not seek glory and power because he was dissatisfied with his life — he sought to protect the place he loved. He already held a noble status, and was married to a “true and honorable wife” (71). He had no need to stir up the empire and his own personal life, but he felt obligated to protect the country and i...
Caesar is all about conquering power and he is afraid of nothing. Before he is murdered, he says “The things that threatened me ne’er looked but on my back. When they shall see the face of Caesar, they shall vanish” (II, ii, 575). This shows how his mind is only set on killing others to get rid of a problem.
Julius Caesar, The man famous for the quote, “I came, I saw, I conquered.” Well known for being a renowned Roman general as well as a statesman, Julius Caesar went on to be a dictator of the Roman Empire. This one man impacted the course of history of the Roman Empire through alliances, gaining widespread support, and changing policies in the government. Although to comprehend how he impacted the Roman Empire, one must first look upon his rise to power.
“Assumptions are normally the mother of all mistakes,” a quote by the philosopher Eugene Fordsworthe. In 58 B.C., Julius Caesar was a Roman General who ruled Rome along with two other men, Crassus and Pompey. Caesar was renowned for his numerous victories against the Gauls. He even defeated one of his alleged partners Pompey, which ultimately gave Caesar full reign of Rome. Caesar was a brutal leader; he even appointed himself dictator for life. Many feared he would become king, and the Roman Republic would have to resort to the past ways of the Roman Monarchy. A group of ‘nobles’ took it upon themselves to assassinate Caesar. Caesar may have been a brutal ruler, but he was accused and judged for actions that had not taken place yet. Therefore, the ‘nobles’ should not have killed Caesar. The first reason they should not have killed him was the fact that they were basing their decisions and anger off of assumptions made about Caesar. Secondly, the death of Caesar created animosity among the Roman people spurring mobs. Lastly, all of the conspirators ended up on the same road as Caesar, and that road was death.
His family finally paid his ransom. Soon after it was paid, Caesar learned that the government was not going to take action and pursue the pirates. Caesar took matters into his own hands. He organized a fleet of ships, captured the pirates and crucified their whole gang. The news of this spread quickly, and Caesar was both admired and criticized for acting so quickly.
In Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar", Caesar is displayed as a powerful and dynamic figure in Rome because of his many accomplishments in previous wars as well as battles. When Caesar returns to Rome from a recent victorious defeat in battle, he receives a warm welcome by all the citizens of Rome. They consider and see Caesar as a hero and a strong individual, which is why they attempt to crown him King three times. A group of generals in Caesar's army are jealous and concerned with the amount of power Caesar has; they make arrangements to kill him. "Power is said to be a man's greatest desire he'll do whatever it takes to achieve his goal, even to kill." In comparison to Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar" and the film Julius Caesar, we see many similarities. Furthermore, I will discuss these similarities in great depth.
Back in Rome, the new leader, Caesar, was named Dictator Perpetuus. As the new dictator, Caesar established many new reforms to help the Populare faction. He ruled without regard to the senate and tried to give himself more power. This made him very unpopular with the senate and the Optimate faction and they feared he would become too powerful. Then, on March 15, 44 BC, on the Ides of March, Julius Caesar was assassinated. Caesar was stabbed 23 times by many of the senators including Caesar’s old friend, Marcus Brutus. Caesar died at the base of a statue of none other than Pompey himself.