Julius Caesar Butchery Analysis

680 Words2 Pages

William Shakespeare’s play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, he follows the men responsible for the assassination of the Roman dictator and how their action change the course of Roman history. During the first two acts, the piece’s main protagonist, Brutus, struggles with the idea of murdering a friend and ally in the name of peace, freedom, and liberty. He eventually realizes that it is the only option he and the conspirators had to save Rome. However, rather than a butchery, the act should be considered a sacrifice for the common good because of Brutus’ overall reluctance to resort to murder and the respect he and the conspirators show Caesar after his death.
In Act I, Scene II, Brutus explains that although he “love[s Caesar] well,” he does …show more content…

However, it is the conversation that comes afterward between the conspirators on the steps of the Senate that emulates how Romans treated sacrifices to the gods. Brutus gives the order to Cassius that “Caesar shall have all true rites and lawful ceremonies;” this is a continuation of Brutus’ order from Act II, Scene I, in which he says to Cassius, “Let’s be sacrificers, but not butchers, Caius...Let’s carve him as a dish fit for the gods, not hew him as a carcass fit for hounds.” Though the word “carve” seems much more savage than it actually is meant to be; Brutus is treating Caesar just like any other religious offering, with deliberate purpose. By treating this man he respected with the formalities of a true sacrifice, Brutus is able to, in some way, receive forgiveness from the gods for his actions and accept that what happened was best for Rome as a whole. This degree of respect is also seen in Brutus’ handling of Mark Antony. Cassius believed that Antony represented a threat to their movement because of his connection to Caesar, but Brutus decides to leave the man untouched for the same reason. Brutus recognizes that if Antony was murdered by his order, not only would he viewed as a butcher cleaning house of all threats, but it would be disrespectful and generally rude to Caesar’s memory. By going against Cassius’

Open Document