Judith Slaying Holofernes Analysis

1610 Words4 Pages

she created two identical versions of the same composition. Although the influence of tenebristic Caravaggio’s style was undeniable for both paintings, the difference was essential in the conceptual development of the theme. In Caravaggio’s painting, viewers find themselves in the theater, where a red curtain at the top of the painting emphasizes the illusion. On the right, next to her old maidservant Abra, static like a statue, with an emotionless and reserved expression, focused on a mission of killing like a priestess, there is a pretty, almost ethereal, young girl, as Judith. On the left, the twisted body of Holofernes, his agonizing silent scream, his eyes begging for mercy, pose him as a sacral victim. Even the bed has a role …show more content…

Also, as the painting progressed from oblivion to notoriety and attained its symbolical feministic meaning, it became easy prey for postmodern artists. Kathleen Gilje painted “Self Portrait in the Kitchen after Artemisia Gentileschi’s Judith and Holofernes” turning the Nebuchadnezzar’s general into a giant rooster as if illustrating the original Gentileschi’s implications and humorously proclaiming a man’s nature (fig.1). Emil Kazaz, in his phantasmagoric Judith #5 "Hung King,” presented Holofernes, in a symbolic narrative sequence, as a giant rat and a hanging lamb carcass, emphasizing once more the animalistic nature of Holofernes, therefore justifying his murder (fig.2). Sometimes, hybrids of cultural forms such as Hillary White, "Beaker Slaying Honeydew (fig.3) or Oliver Scott Snure’s “Holofernes Revenge” (fig.4) surfaced up in pop culture as homage or parody. Even so, Gentileschi’s “Judith” has avoided the superficial comparisons and visual devaluation associated with mass reproduction as has happened to images of Leonardo’s Mona Lisa, Van Gogh’s Starry Night or Klimt’s The Kiss. The painting remains unexpected, visually provocative, and historically

Open Document