Judith Nies Fight For Equality

1243 Words3 Pages

The 1960s were years spent in war, both in actual combat overseas and in a fight for equal rights on the home front. Particularly for women, the battle for equal rights was an exhausting struggle that generated success, but not the desired amount. This was due to the numerous obstacles and prejudices women faced along the way, set back by men and society’s unjust standards for women. In The Girl I Left Behind, Judith Nies observes the difficulties women encountered in the educational system and political field, detailing how the disregard for women hindered their opportunities for success and forced them to accept a compromised lifestyle instead of gender equality.
Negligence for educational equality between men and women limited the potential …show more content…

She was even angrier that school officials had so little imagination that they didn’t question why the administration was all male.” Clarissa, Nies’ imaginary embodiment of her inner angered feminist, projects all of Nies’ discontent with sexism in the educational system. Given Nies’ position as a student during Clarissa’s creation, Clarissa expresses Nies’ frustration with America’s inability to offer equal education for men and women. This inequality includes differences in treatment, opportunities, positions, and placements, where men were given access to much more than women ever were. Even when in the same situation as women, men received the better option and security than women could imagine having. This unjust treatment is later summed up by Nies simply, “The point here is that education was not a boundary; prejudice was.” Whether or not women pursued higher education, it was not their education level holding them back from receiving better jobs and careers. It was prejudice that offered more opportunities to men than to women, prejudice that kept women back from success, …show more content…

Despite how involved women were in politics, their presence remained publicly unappreciated. Nies writes, “Women were still not considered an important part of national politics as either voters or activists. Women were important as supporters—organizers, volunteers, and canvassers for political campaigns—but they were not considered an organized political force with defined interests.” Women played a big part in political campaigns, yet they were not recognized outside “behind the scenes.” Their help and work benefitted politics greatly but was not acknowledged, granting them even less acknowledgement when participating as activists and voters, two examples of more public political stances. Once public, women’s political participation was not taken seriously for women were not thought of as having defined opinions. This weakened women’s voices in politics even more because their stances were never seriously recognized, limiting their ability to progress their rights and make a change. Another reason women’s political voices were weak is that women were expected to be politically silent, “Women were not supposed to have a voice. Women weren’t full human beings except as wives and mothers and secretaries and decoration. We were there to serve. We were always ‘girls’ in the same way African American men were ‘boys,’ regardless of age. The realities of sex discrimination

Open Document