The White House staff has a major influence on the President and their decisions. Within the Executive Office, the President has their closest advisors working with them. Since it is people the President has respect for, their opinions will influence any opinion, choice, or thought the President has. The White House staff is always around the President, therefore their opinions on matters can be voiced at any time. The State of the Union Speech is one of the most important speeches a President must give. In this speech the President will give their assessment on the nation; they talk about the economy, foreign policies, the military, and any crisis that might be happening or have happened. The purpose of this speech is to set a tone and …show more content…
The job of the Judicial Branch is to explain the laws of the land. This means that they decide if a law is constitutional or not. Without the Judicial Branch, the government as a whole could abuse its power. The Judicial Branch has the power to check the other branches. When it comes to the Legislative Branch, the Judicial Branch is allowed to have their court systems decide if a piece of legislation is constitutional. This job prevents unconstitutional laws getting passed. When it comes to the Executive Branch, the Judicial Branch has the power to judge executive actions and decide if they are constitutional. The Judicial Branch is mainly around to make sure no Branch tries to do things that are unconstitutional. The next topic is how cases are argued in front of the Supreme Court. In order for this to work effectively, the Supreme Court has a procedure. The first step is allowing each side to argue their points for 30 minutes each. This time limit ensures that each side is given enough time to argue their case. The next step is having the Justices review the cases and giving them time to form their own opinion. The Justices will review every detail so they can decide if they want to change anything. The third step is having the Justices meet and discuss their findings on the cases. This allows them to hear each other’s opinions and discuss things thoroughly. The final step is them announcing …show more content…
In the case of Marbury vs. Madison, John Marshall argued that the Supreme Court should be able to determine the constitutionality of laws that come before the court. The point of this argument was so no judge could allow any unconstitutional law to pass. In the end of the trial, John Marshall lost to Jefferson, who stated that the Branches should check the laws. Today, the Branches are still in charge of everything that has to do with laws. Another case was Brown vs. Board of Education. In this case, the courts ruled that separate but equal was unconstitutional. The Constitution has had many instances of needing the courts help of clarifying it. The courts will take an unconstitutional law and correct as
In order to grasp the rhetorical situation, one must first understand the correlation between the purpose of the State of the Union Address and the response to the address. Before discussing the response in detail, one needs to know why the State of the Union Address is given. According to the website, This Nation, the intent of the State of the Union Address shall convey a message of what America is striving to become in the form of speech to the citizens. The website defines the State of the Union Address by stating, “ shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the
Madison, declared the power of the courts to interpret the Constitution and affirmed the power of judicial review. The power of judicial review averted the judiciary branch of the inherent weakness and lack of equality in power among the three branches of government. The independence of the Supreme Court is paramount in protecting the civil liberties granted to citizens. The judicial power afforded by means of the doctrine of judicial review is not superior or above the other two branches of government. The Supreme Court’s duty is to nullify legislative acts contrary to the Constitution. Hamilton expounds the power of the courts in the Federalist Papers No. 78, “it only supposes that the power of the people is superior to both”, and judges should regulate their decisions by the fundamental laws, (Hamilton, 2008). The Supreme Court’s duty is to nullify legislative acts contrary to the
...09). Congress is supposed to enact laws, and the ability of judges to modify them with court decisions shows how their power may extend past what the system of checks and balances had intended. The last aspect that shows how powerful this branch may be is the judges. Originally, the lifetime appointment was supposed to relieve them of pressures when deciding cases, but this serves as a double edged sword. Judges without fear of retribution shows the amount of power that they posses. Overall, the development of judicial review, judges lifetime appointment, and ability to modify laws has led to an unbalance of power by the Judicial Branch among the three branches of government.
2. The judicial branch is known as the evaluators or interpreters. They interpret the meaning of laws and apply them to individual cases; they are the final decision if a law violates the U.S. Constitution (“Branches of Government”).
The Judiciary Branch offers checks and balances to the other branches of government. To both the Legislative and Executive branches, the Judicial Branch holds the power of judicial review. The Judicial branch can also declare existing laws as unconstitutional.
3 The legislative branch is the lawmaking branch of government. 4 The executive branch is the branch that enforces the laws of government power, and the judicial branch oversees the enforcement and creation of laws so that they are following the rulebook of the founding ideas of governmental power. All of these branches shown in any representation of government would be a practical representation. 4. 1 Demonstrate knowledge of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of the federal
The president decides his policies and strategy for his term in office. The White House Staff is present to help implement the president’s policies smoothly, and help many aspects of his presidency run smoothly. It is important that the White House speaks with one voice, and this is accomplished through following the president’s policies. While the staff does not choose the tasks they preform, but they do run the day-to-day operations of the office. This is why the president will choose someone he trusts to preform the tasks well, and the way he would want. At the beginning of a term the president is more likely to choose individuals who believe in the promises he ran his campaign on (National Journal). However, later in his term the president will often fill these positions with people who are loyal (National Journal). This will decrease friction and disagreement within the White House, and help promote a single message. Obama, in his second term, has been filling key staff positions with people loyal to him. This is to create a unity between himself and his staff. He will be facing a Republican held house and senate. Obama will be busy fighting with congress, and does not need fighting within his own staff. Individuals who have positions that deal with the press must be saying things the way the president wants. Speechwriters must articulate the message and use the language the president wants. The president has
President Obama’s Inaugural Speech: Rhetorical Analysis. Barrack Obama’s inauguration speech successfully accomplished his goal by using rhetoric to ensure our nation that we will be in safe hands. The speech is similar to ideas obtained from the founding documents and Martin Luther King’s speech to establish ‘our’ goal to get together and take some action on the problems our country is now facing. As President Barack Obama starts his speech, he keeps himself from using ‘me’, ‘myself’, and ‘I’ and replacing it with ‘we’, ‘us’, and ‘together’ to achieve his ethos.
Each speech has its own audience that differs from the other. In the inaugural speech the audience was the public and therefore the speech was short and used short sentences that are easy to understand. On the other hand, the state of union speech’s audience was mostly the Congress members and therefore the language was more specific and filled with political terminology. Both speeches will be discussed in context and using ethos, pathos and logos. First of all, the Inaugural Address was the President Obama’s speech that was delivered to the crowds after the oath of office ceremony that took place at the West Front of the United States.
The Supreme Court of the United States has the highest authority in the Judicial Branch and is the third branch of government. The function of the Supreme Court is to interpret the Constitution. The Supreme Court looks at federal and state statues and executive actions to determine if they comply with the United States Constitution. On the Supreme Court, there are nine justices that hear cases that have been appealed through the justice system. When the Supreme Court rules in a case that is the la...
They get the power to make laws and this seems like a big job, and maybe too big of a job for just one branch. However, there are checks and balances and they can’t go too crazy with the laws they make. The Congress has enumerated powers, meaning they have powers that are written in the constitution that they should follow, and they also have implied powers meaning that they can do something that isn’t listed specifically in the constitution that is mandatory for them to do their job. There is the Necessary and Proper clause that allows the Legislative branch to do something that is not on the list if it relates to something that is on the list. They can stretch an enumerated power from the constitution to make it related to a law that they are trying to make themselves. In my opinion, this is a good thing because there are so many laws that are necessary that aren’t directly in the constitution but they still need to be there. If Congress followed it directly there would be a lack of laws that we need. Now, this seems like a lot for the Congress to be able to basically make any law that they want. That is in some ways is kind of true but the Judicial branch can declare the laws unconstitutional if they are not and prevent the law from being enacted. The legislative branch has the power to declare war. This is a good thing in case the executive wants to step out of line and try to declare war, despite the fact that it may not be totally necessary. Giving this job to the Legislative branch is only fair because it is in the constitution as one of their enumerated powers. From the newsela article, Legislative and Judicial Results of the Civil Rights Movement, we see some good examples of how good laws are made and how bad laws are made. Jim crow made some unfair laws that took away the rights of the slaves that they had just earned. In the article we read, ¨Jim Crow laws also
One of the Judicial Branch’s many powers is the power of judicial review. Judicial review allows the Supreme Court to decide whether or not the other branches of governments’ actions are constitutional or not. This power is very important because it is usually the last hope of justice for many cases. This also allows the court to overturn lower courts’ rulings. Cases like Miranda v. Arizona gave Miranda justice for having his rules as a citizen violated. The court evalutes whether any law was broken then makes their ruling. Also, the Weeks v. United States case had to be reviewed by the court because unlawful searches and siezures were conducted by officers. One of the most famous cases involving judicial review was the Plessey v. Ferguson
The Judicial Branch consists of the United States Supreme Court and the lower federal courts. Their role is to hear cases that challenges the legislation or are in need of interpretation of that legislation. (Phaedra Trethan, 2013) (Federal Government, 2003) (Sparknotes, LLC, 2011) (Independence Hall Association, 2008-2012)
The judiciary branch is the seen as the “least dangerous” branch; therefore, it will not be able to attack the way the other two branches can and it cannot defend itself against attacks. The judicial branch is only seen as one that can pass judgment on cases that are either constitutional or unconstitutional, but it cannot act on it; therefore, the reason they are seen as less dangerous and cannot compare to the power that the executive and legislative branch have. They have to hear appeals,
Every four years, the American people one of the most important decision in American Government. The country’s vote on who will be the president for the next four years. The president is one face who is seen as the head of the country, responsible for every aspect of it. Although many Americans view the president as this type of figurehead, a great deal of people do not actually know what responsibilities the president has or what powers he/she has to change the state of the country. Understanding the powers of the presidency as a country will help the voters to make a more informed decision and judgement in regards to the presidency.