Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rhetorical analysis of speech
Rhetorical Analysis essay
Rhetorical analysis of speech
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Rhetorical analysis of speech
An Analysis on the Inaugural Speech of Former President Joseph Ejercito Estrada using Burke’s Theory of Dramatism and the Five Canons of Rhetoric in the
Classical Rhetorical Theory
Rhetoric has a significant role in influencing people’s beliefs regarding the state of affairs and their opinions about public policies especially in the field of politics. The study of political discourse becomes a necessity. Gronbeck (1996) supported this as he stated:
Politics understood as a symbolic action demands that we analyze systematically the discourses of political ideology and valuation, of political visions and places citizens occupy in such visions; of the means by which self-interests are converted into public interests—into public policies’ (Gronbeck
Invention refers to the speaker’s use of resources in finding and developing the subject of his rhetoric. It involves the three forms of proof: ethos, pathos and logos. Ethos describes the character of the speaker. In Erap’s speech, he exemplified a tough guy with a soft heart for the poor – an image similar to the characters he portrayed as an actor in films. Aristotle states that three qualities are necessary for the speaker to construct a view of himself as a certain kind of person which are: practical wisdom, virtue and good will. Estrada has shown these characteristics. He was knowledgeable and experienced in politics. He was a respected politician who fought for peace and against crime. He appeared to be enthusiastic and determined to the interest of the audience for his “maka-masa” theme. The second proof is pathos which is the appeal to emotion. Estrada showed that he understands the feeling of the audience who are the Filipino citizens. He knew that most of the Filipino are experiencing poverty and are hoping for prosperity. His presidential campaign was based on a pro-poor agenda with ‘Erap para sa Mahirap’ (Erap for the Poor) as slogan and the theme of his speech is being “maka-masa”. He evokes the feeling of friendliness that he is a friend to all the Filipino. Estrada also evoked the emotion of being angry to corruption and crime as he exclaimed his fight to stop and punish them. Lastly, logos or the rational arguments and evidence that the speaker gives to support his claims was presented in Estrada’s speech by following the induction type which is reasoning from particular cases to a general conclusion. Estrada gave examples of the crimes that causes poverty and he concluded that by fighting it the country and the citizens will
Senator Albert Beveridge, a progressive Republican who wants to annex the Philippines. The Philippines would be the United States stepping-stone into Asia and give the Unites States a reliable and needed source of goods. Alongside the vast resource of the Philippines the United States could spread its vast knowledge to a barbaric culture. Though the Senator wants to help the Philippines by going into foreign land change the foundation of the people, try and fit the people into a mold and call them respectable people. Especially when a leader, Emilio Aguinaldo, are willing to fight to the death to free themselves of occupation.
Heinrichs begins by explaining the art of rhetoric and laying out the basic tools of argument. He emphasizes the importance of using the proper tense to avoid arguing the wrong issue. Furthermore, he introduces logos, ethos and pathos and shows how to “wield” each rhetorical tool. In Part 2, Heinrichs discusses common logical fallacies as well as rhetorical fouls. He remarks rhetoric’s single rule of never arguing the inarguable and demonstrates how ethos helps to know whom to trust. In Part 3, Kairos becomes an important tool for knowing the right time to persuade one’s audience. In Part 4 of the novel, the author provides examples of how to use rhetorical tools previously introduced in the
John F Kennedy delivered one of the finest speeches on January 20, 1961 after being sworn into office. His inauguration speech was so powerful that it captured the entire nations attention, and quotes from it are still remembered by people today. It is one of the finest speeches ever written. It provides a strong appeal to pathos, ethos and logos, and it is because of this that people who never heard the speech can quote lines from it.
Lloyd F. Bitzer’s article, “The Rhetorical Situation”, is an account of what he calls the “rhetorical situation” as what he believes to be the conditions necessary for compelling a rhetorician to engage in rhetoric (35). It is Bitzer’s position that a work of rhetoric comes into existence as a response to the call of a certain state of affairs in the world (32). Furthermore, Bitzer claims that when we find ourselves in such “situations”, we are compelled to engage in rhetoric in order to restore the balance that we find lacking (34). He identifies three interconnected elements of situational rhetoric: exigence, audience, and constraints (35). Bitzer argues that a rhetorical discourse, which consists of an engagement with an audience for the purpose of compelling that audience to modify the world so as to repair the problem which is presented (35), is required to solve the problem as the world presents it (34). This lack of balance in a rhetorical situation or state of affairs in the world leads to what Bitzer calls exigence, which he defines as “an imperfection marked by urgency” (36). Bitzer also expands on the notion of a rhetorical audience, which is central to his theory of situational rhetoric. Bitzer defines a rhetorical audience as persons who, through discourse, are subject to influence and as persons who can be compelled to bring about the change called for by a rhetorical situation (37). Bitzer also identifies constraints as being a vital component to his theory, which he defines as anything within the rhetorical situation which has the power to “constrain decision” (38).
There have been many historical events in history that have impacted America in many ways. For example, famous Speeches given by important people such as Franklin D. Roosevelt, the 32nd president of the united states which his main goal was to help America recover from the severe economic issues during the 1930’s. Roosevelt used rhetorical devices to persuade desperate Americans, wounded from the Great Depression, by introducing a plan which it will be the best way to recover from the severe crisis that affected Americans. In Franklin D. Roosevelt, First Inaugural Address, he used personification, diction, and antimetabole to convey his conflicting feelings about the New Deal, in order to face the economic issues
Ronald Reagan, the 40th president of the United States of America, tries to diminish the influence of the federal government in an individual’s life. By doing so, Ronald Reagan created a comparison between the year before (1985) to the year they were in at the time. (1986) Showing all of the positive outcomes in 1986 and the troubles during the year 1985. Reagan uses the appeal to logic to define all of the successful turnouts they’ve had and uses the appeal to emotion to focus more on how the government is too powerful; “taking away opportunities.” When Ronald created these rhetorical devices, it could convince citizens that “private values must be at the heart of public policies,” and that they don’t need
Every day we perform some type of analysis rather we are aware of this or not. When we’re watching television, meeting someone for the first time, choosing something to wear etc. Learning to apply analysis to rhetoric situations is a valuable skill. As a college student this knowledge will assist me in writing persuasive argument essays and discussion post. It will allow me to make informed decision prior to buying products and give me a better insight on political debates as a citizen.
Since the main reason of his sermon is to inspire rather than educate, Kennedy rarely uses any logical pleads. Yet, Kennedy adequately uses passionate dialect to make the people sense their involvement in what all the President says. Kennedy composes the assignment to bring back tranquility and good-wealth as not only his aim, but of the public as well. With famed verses like, “Ask not what your country can do for you – ask what you can do for your country,” Kennedy makes the spectators feel inclined to make an impact in the world they live. Apart from infusing a sense of obligation in the crowd, Kennedy’s greatest element in his speech was the aptitude to arouse a feeling of esteem in the audience. Kennedy constantly uses phrases about freedom and sovereignty to remind the people they still are. “The heirs of that first revolution.” This dialect portrays America as a powerful and patriarch republic that possesses greater philanthropy of all the other nations around the world. Even though much of the address is fervent in tone, Kennedy devotes a large section of his topic to outline his ethos to all inhabitants of the world. JFK introduced the use of ethos at the inception of his address. Kennedy was very young when he came into office, but he was still obliged to act at the same status as former presidents. Attentive to this condition, Kennedy
Barrack Obama’s inauguration speech successfully accomplished his goal by using rhetoric to ensure our nation that we will be under safe hands. The speech is similar from ideas obtained from the founding documents and Martin Luther King’s speech to establish ‘our’ goal to get together and take some action on the problems our country is now facing. As President Barrack Obama starts his speech, he keeps himself from using ‘me’, ‘myself’, and ‘I’ and replacing it with ‘we’, ‘us’, and ‘together’ to achieve ethos. He makes sure his audience connects with him directly by making them feel at his level, and him at theirs. This way he connects to the audience, and in exchange, helps his statement of unity. Using various examples of parallelism, anaphora and refrain, Obama brands the theme of equality and togetherness in our country throughout the speech, vital to gain the respect of his audience. Obama recalls the ‘enduring strength of the constitution’ by delving into the past alluding to America’s allegiance to the Declaration of Independence by quoting “we hold these truths… that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”. This expression clearly shows more ethos by reminding us that the quote of equality is of great importance today as it was the time it was written.
In this essay, I will be analyzing the Traditional method of rhetorical criticism and the Narrative method of rhetorical criticism.
Rhetoric is something that we use constantly in our everyday life. Unbeknown to us, we have been using the persuasive appeals of pathos, ethos and logos even for the most mundane things. Rhetoric can be seen everywhere in our everyday’s lives in form of media, religion, politics, government propaganda, historic references and social media. We should learn to identify and appropriately use the different categories of rhetoric expressions in an effective manner. Rhetoric is the study of effective speaking and writing in order to convince the audience or the reader. It is sued to convince the audience to think in the same way as the arguer or the presenter.
John Fitzgerald Kennedy, the thirty-fifth president in USA, gave the speech to all Americans when he became the president. On January 20th, 1961, Kennedy gave the attention to the international affairs, appeal the American to undertake more duty, and make more sacrifices in his speech. His Inaugural Speech uttering, sentence and paragraph are carefully crafted, of which the biggest feature was a large number of figures of speech using. Rhetoric is the use of language, according to the specific purpose of carefully chosen language process, and strives to make the language clear, vivid and exciting.
The speech “Address to the Joint Session of the 107th Congress” was delivered the 20th September 2001 in the United States Capitol by the President who was at that time, George W. Bush. In this public statement, the president calls for unity and tranquillity of American people. This paper has as main curiosity that it is an argumentative text full of rhetorical elements. On the one hand, it tries to calm Americans and to soothe the pain of the people affected. On the other hand, it helps to create a feeling of hatred and anger towards Al Qaeda, the terrorist group that carried out the attempt. Based on the document Analysing argumentative Texts and Hugh Rank’s Intensification/ Downplay schema, the rhetorical elements could be more easily scanned. There are intensifier components in this speech such as repetitions, associations and composition and downplay elements which methods used are diversion, omission ad confusion.
After World War II, tensions between the United States, its allies, and the Soviet Union became very apparent. When John F. Kennedy (JFK) was elected in 1960, this “Cold War” between the communist government of the Soviet Union and the democratic government of the United States had strained relationships around the world for over 15 years. After losing their sense of security, the American people elected John F. Kennedy in 1960 as the 35th President of the United States because they believed he could lead the country to peace and prosperity. Although President Kennedy knew these goals of peace and prosperity would not be achieved in the term of his presidency or his lifetime, he also knew the world could eventually accomplish them through
A. A. The Philippines People, Poverty and Politics. New York: The New York Times. St. Martins's P, 1987. 1-225.