Jonathan Edwards Reflection

753 Words2 Pages

Jonathan Edwards way of going about this sermon was very intense and frightening. His goal was to show them that the only hope for salvation is being reborn in Christ. He wanted to warn them about Hell and what it would be like if they didn't repent and ask for salvation. He achieved this goal by focusing his whole sermon on the wrath of God and what Hell is like. He used imagery as very powerful technique and its impact was clear throughout the congregation. His purpose of that was in my opinion to engrain it in their heads and forever hold a place of fear there. He got his point across in a very intense way but I do not think it was the most effective way to go about something like this. In my opinion, I think it was not the right approach to a certain extent. His approach was very intense and scary to the Puritans and …show more content…

I think scaring individuals with very vivid images in their heads, is not right. Like I mentioned before, they would be going into salvation or anything for the wrong reasons. It would be out of the utter fear of going to hell. I think he could of talked about God in a more positive way than talking about how angry and mean God is. God is loving and caring and if he would of mentioned that then maybe the sermon would of been different and there would of been a better result. I agree that it's important to talk about hell and the seriousness of it, but the how the sermon came out, it seemed that he was trying to scare them into salvation. God gives us a choice into whether we want to live in eternity with him, and that should have been mentioned. It wasn’t Edwards job to make that decision for them. He was trying to save people but really he was doing the opposite and scaring them off. God wants us to choose him because we love him and want a relationship with him, not because we don’t want to go perish for what we

Open Document