Jon Krakauer Rhetorical Analysis

524 Words2 Pages

Krakauer In the beginning of the third section the novel uses a narrative and descriptive style. The point of view is 1st person. Furthermore, he says, "the mask actually gave the illusion of asphyxiating me, so I tore it from my face—only to discover breathing was even harder without it." Krakauer also uses high levels of diction in his novel. For example, he says, but it would end up being one of many little things-a slow accrual, compounding steadily and imperceptibly toward critical mass. Jon Krakauer also uses symbolism of the bottled oxygen that is required for many to climb. The bottled oxygen represents the way that technology makes climbing Mount Everest a much easier proposition. Furthermore, he says, "the simplest way to reduce future …show more content…

The sight of a full oxygen canister is enough to cause joy, particularly when a climber fears he or she is running out. On the other hand, however, oxygen represents the fact that for the most part, people are not meant to exist in high altitudes. Some mountain climbing purists ascend without supplemental oxygen, but the vast majority of climbers and all of the clients on the 1996 expedition need the oxygen. In a situation where there are many elements against them, having a canister of air provides security and puts a climber on a more level playing field. The oxygen also gives the climbers an additional sense of confidence—as long as they can breathe, they are still alive.Jon Krakauer has an objective tone after saying, “A perceptive young man, Lopsang was extremely devoted to Fischer; the Sherpa understood how important it was to his friend and employer to get Pittman to the summit. This also adds on what one of Krakauer’s main themes are which is loyalty among teammate. Loyalty is so important that it must be stressed separately. On Everest, loyalty basically means that a climber will risk his or her own life to help

Open Document