Joining The Neo-Nazi Group

683 Words2 Pages

Lars’s transformation from a soldier serving the Danish army to an active member of the Neo-Nazi group can be seen a significant shift of his self-identity that is triggered by the inner-world alienation. Such alienation is a derivative of the anger that is associated with social pressure and isolation. Before joining the Neo-Nazi group, Lars is undertaking overwhelming pressures along with sadness, anger, and hopelessness that come from the isolation imposed by both the society and his family. His future career is ruined by the anonymous accusations from other soldiers who intentionally fabricate against him in order to force him out of the army. Lars’s depression gets worse when he comes back home and confronting his parents. To a certain …show more content…

Lars initially describes the group as “a bunch of losers trying to recruit even bigger losers” and criticizes the paradox between their ideologies “pacifists” and “fascists”. I argue that his sudden decision in joining the group is driven by his desire to pursue a sense of belonging, which is the main force that attracts people into hateful groups. In the film, many group members (e.g. Lars, Jimmy, Patrick) come from a family where parenting roles are absent or lack sufficient concerns. In addition, as we can observe from the film, most of the participants of the Neo-Nazi group are young males. I believe those commonalities within group members are not simple coincidences. Male teenagers are more likely to get obsessed with relying on violence to release their repressed dissatisfaction and enhance their presence to further achieve self-satisfaction. This process is some sort of “dream-realizing” allows the marginalized people immerse in an illusion of overpowering others. Although Lars is clearly much more intelligent and sophisticated than his peers, he is still at a life stage when his emotion is highly unstable and has a strong eager to seek and to reach …show more content…

In the film, Lars’ gayness is used as a trigger for him to discover the discrimination towards the homosexual within the group. The scene I found most compelling is when Lars is telling the story of Ernst Rohm, who is the Hitler’s right-hand man and achieved a high popularity among the public. Due to the fear of being threatened by Rohm’s power, Hitler got him executed and blamed Rohm as a queer to turn the mainstream’s opinions against him. This story is used as a metaphor to point out that a person’s identity as queer is utilized as an excuse by other groups (e.g. Neo-Nazi group) to blindly deny that person’s talent and accomplishments. As I mentioned before, the Neo-Nazi group members share an obsession with overpowering other people. By telling Rohm’s story, Lars reveals the fact that the way hateful groups use violence to oppress marginalized people, such as conducting the queer-bashing expeditions to torture the homosexual group is a way they use to weaken the power of the otherness and to gain a sense of superiority to satisfy their selfish needs. Lars eventually finds out the hypocritical of the so-call “brotherhood” Neo-Nazi group and gets deeply disappointed by them being the fanatics on grabbing power even at the cost of sacrificing

Open Document