John Locke

607 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Implications of John Locke's theory

John Locke John Locke, born on Aug. 29, 1632, in Somerset, England, was an English philosopher and political theorist. Locke was educated at Christ Church, Oxford, where he followed the traditional classical curriculum and then turned to the study of medicine and science, receiving a medical degree, but his interest in philosophy was reawakened by the study of Descartes. He then joined the household of Anthony Ashley Cooper, later the earl of Shaftesbury, as a personal physician at first, becoming a close friend and advisor. Shaftesbury secured for Locke a series of minor government appointments. In 1669, in one of his official capacities, Locke wrote a constitution for the proprietors of the Carolina Colony in North America, but it was never put into effect. In 1671 Locke began to write his greatest work, the Essay Concerning Human Understanding, which took nearly twenty years to complete since he was deeply engaged in Shaftesbury's political affairs. In 1675, after the liberal Shaftesbury had fallen from favor, Locke went to France. In 1679 he returned to England, but in view of his opposition to the Roman Catholicism favored by the English monarchy at that time, he soon found it expedient to return to the Continent. From 1683 to 1688 he lived in Holland, and following the Glorious Revolution of 1688 and the restoration of Protestantism to favor, Locke returned once more to England. The new king, William III, appointed Locke to the Board of Trade in 1696, a position from which he resigned because of ill health in 1700. He died in Oates on October 28, 1704. Locke's Essay is one of the classical documents of British empirical philosophy. His official concern is with epistemology, the theory of knowledge. Locke sees the u... ... middle of paper ... ...ers. Against Hobbes, Locke argues that the ruler's rights as well as those of everyone are restrained by the laws of nature; the right to life, liberty, and property. The ruler's powers are given to him as a trust for the good of the citizens, and if the trust is broken his powers can be taken away. He believed that a monarchy with an assembly to hold the monarch to his trust was an ideal political arrangement. Unlike Hobbes he believed that principles of conduct were rational and humans could be trusted to follow those principles. Locke's influence in modern philosophy has been profound and, with his application of empirical analysis to ethics, politics, and religion, he remains one of the most important and controversial philosophers of all time. Among his other works are Some Thoughts Concerning Education (1693) and The Reasonableness of Christianity (1695).

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of John Locke: The Second Treatise Of Government

    2379 Words  | 5 Pages

    Lockes and Hobbes ideas of government differed greatly, Hobbes believed in an absolute government while Locke believed in a very limited one.Locke believed that people were naturally good and trustful and that they had the capacity to govern themselves. So the need of the government only came in the form of stopping any potential disputes that would occur. While Hobbes believed that humans were not all that good and their need for government stemmed from the fact that people cannot govern themselves. Furthermore Locke believed that the governments role was to listen to the people it was governing, a rule by consent. While Hobbes believed that the Government was to rule on it’s own and owed no answers or consent by the people. Moreover Locke believed that the purpose of the government was to protect the property and freedom of its people, while Hobbes believed that the governments role was to tell them what to do. But arguably the biggest difference between the philosophies is the notion of government accountability. Hobbes believed that the government had free reign to do what they please with no backlash, while Locke believed that if the social contract was broken then the people of the community had the right to revolt and over throw the government. To further this point Locke unlike Hobbes believed that leaders should

    Read More

  • John Locke and the Enlightenment

    575 Words  | 2 Pages

    This paper is about John Locke who was a philosopher in the 17-century. He was an Englishmen and his ideas formed the basic concept for the government and laws, which later allowed colonist to justify revolution. I agree with what Locke is saying because everybody should be able to have their own freedom and still respect the freedom of other people. John said, “Individuals have rights, and their duties are defined in terms of protecting their own rights and respecting those of others”. This paper will present to you information about his enlightenment, personal information, and how we as people feel about his decisions.

    Read More

  • Hobbes and Locke: The Power Debate

    1209 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hobbes, an aristocrat who lived through the English civil war, had to flee England, watch his monarch’s execution, and observes the violence of human nature at its very worst. Given this experience, his central concern was the need for absolute power to maintain peace and prevent another civil war. On the other hand, John Locke lived and wrote forty years later, after the Glorious Revolution. His ideas developed in the context of a period in which individual’s rights and power were emphasized. He believed that individuals needed freedom from control to reach their full potential. Hobbes became an advocate for absolutism--the belief that because humans are naturally power seeking, a sovereign is needed to maintain peace, and the individual must completely submit to that power. In contrast, Locke advocated constitutionalism, the belief that all individuals have inherit rights, government should be based on consensus, and citizens must fight for their liberty in the face of an overpowering government. These philosophers and their ideas outlined the debate about where power should lie in society–with the individual or with the state.

    Read More

  • John Locke and Thomas Hobbes

    1073 Words  | 3 Pages

    Locke believes that humans inherently possess complete and inalienable equality in the state of nature.... ... middle of paper ... ... Locke also has a better argument than Hobbes because Hobbes’ belief that it is necessary to have a supreme ruler in order to prevent the state of war in society is inherently flawed.

    Read More

  • Locke and Rousseau

    1787 Words  | 4 Pages

    Locke and Rousseau present themselves as two very distinct thinkers. They both use similar terms, but conceptualize them differently to fulfill very different purposes. As such, one ought not be surprised that the two theorists do not understand liberty in the same way. Locke discusses liberty on an individual scale, with personal freedom being guaranteed by laws and institutions created in civil society. By comparison, Rousseau’s conception portrays liberty as an affair of the entire political community, and is best captured by the notion of self-rule. The distinctions, but also the similarities between Locke and Rousseau’s conceptions can be clarified by examining the role of liberty in each theorist’s proposed state of nature and civil society, the concepts with which each theorist associates liberty, and the means of ensuring and safeguarding liberty that each theorist devises.

    Read More

  • How Did John Locke Contribute To The French Revolution

    542 Words  | 2 Pages

    In his magnitude as the secretary to the Lords Proprietary, he was involved in writing of the fundamental constitution of the Carolinas. There were some problems about Locke’s role in writing the constitution. Locke begins to write papers for Lord Ashley on the economic matters, and including the coinage crisis. While he was living in London at Exeter House, he continued to be involved in the philosophical discussions.This was the most important period in Locke’s life when he began working on the project, it would be the climax in his most famous works,the Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Two of his earliest drafts of the work date from 1671, he continued to work on this project for nearly twenty years. In 1675 Locke travelled to France for seven years, while he was in France he spent as a tutor and a medical attendant for Caleb Banks. Jonh return to England in 1679 when Shaftesbury’s political fortunes took a positive turn. Shaftesbury’s prompting, Lock composed the Two Treatises of Government, Locke wrote the Treatises to defend the Glorious Revolution. Locke went to the Netherlands in 1683 under the strong suspicion in his involvement in the Rye House Plot. While Locke was in the Netherlands her return to his writing, he spent

    Read More

  • How Did John Locke Influence The Enlightenment

    549 Words  | 2 Pages

    He wrote several works that were popular in his time as well. Locke also had an impact on the medicine of his day. He argued that people are not born with ideas like the government and religion suggested. Locke believed that people’s ideas are formed

    Read More

  • Similarities Between John Locke And Thomas Hobbes

    909 Words  | 2 Pages

    Locke coined these terms ‘Natural Rights’ and said they were the right to life, liberty and prosperity. These idea of these rights directly influenced one of the most important documents in history, the Declaration of Independence. The Declaration of Independence reads, “All men are created equal that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness”, demonstrating the direct influence of John Locke on one of the most important documents in history. Hobbes’ view contrasted with Locke because Hobbes was a literal believer of the Social Contract in all areas of life. Hobbes believed one needed to surrender all rights to a monarch in order for that monarch to provide structure and protection in their

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Thomas Hobbes

    1766 Words  | 4 Pages

    While Thomas Hobbes believed that all people were wicked only fighting for their own interests, John Locke believed that person were naturally good and once they were born, they were empty slates which makes them learn from their experiences instead of just being outright evil. John Locke believed in democracy because if a government is like an absolute monarch, it won’t satisfy all the needs of the people and this is why the people have a right to revolt against an abusive government as proven in the American Revolutionary War with King George III or the French Revolutionary War with King Louis XVI who didn 't support their citizen’s ideas and goals. Thomas Hobbes believed that people couldn 't be trusted because they would only fight for their own interests, so an absolute monarch would demand obedience to maintain order, but John Locke States that people can be trusted since all people are naturally good but depending on our experiences as they can still govern themselves. The Purpose of the government, according to John Locke is to protect the individual liberties and rights instead of just keeping law and order because with law and order being put strictly, the people would rebel because it didn’t represent them and then the country will collapse because the king was too

    Read More

  • Two Sided Coin: Thomas Hobbes vs. John Locke

    893 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...at should the people do? With Rebellion against the Government that is abusive to the people. Hobbes mentions because people had no say in their Government, they could do nothing if the monarch were abusive. But Locke the people had the right to revolt against an abusive government. With both of these views we see one side saying that people should revolt if they feel like there rights are violated while the other side thinks more on the lines that people shouldn’t do anything because you rights are decide by the government. But could people be trusted to govern themselves? Hobbes said No, people could be trusted to govern themselves and an absolute monarch would demand obedience in to maintain order. But Locke says yes, people could be trusted to govern themselves, he believed that if provided with the right information would make good decisions should be fine.

    Read More

  • Comparing Thomas Hobbes And Locke's Theory Of Government

    1460 Words  | 3 Pages

    These differences affect the livelihood and happiness of people. Hobbes wanted a government to prevent chaos and anarchy as he saw all men were selfish after his experience with the Civil War, while Locke wanted a government to protect everyone’s natural rights. Hobbes Monarch with an absolute ruler, Is different than Locke’s idea of a constitutional government. Hobbes absolute ruler theory forced people to behave themselves, and protected them from killing each other, Locke’s constitutional theory protected their lives, their liberty, and their property. These are different because, while Locke agrees with protecting peoples lives such as Hobbes did, he also believed more than just lives should be protected. Another difference between Hobbes and Locke was their belief if power should be limited. Since Hobbes believed in an absolute ruler, and his idea of government formed a Monarchy, the people were to give up their sovereignty for their own good to the absolute ruler. This gave the absolute ruler unlimited power, which prevented the people from over throwing him. While Locke’s idea of government, which was formed to aid the protection of peoples natural rights and not only to protect themselves from one another, limited the power of the government and gave people the right to over throw the government if they failed to protect their natural rights. Their

    Read More

  • John Locke, George Berkeley and David Hume

    1235 Words  | 3 Pages

    John Locke, Berkeley and Hume are all empiricist philosophers that believe in different things. They have things in common such as the three anchor points; The only source of genuine knowledge is sense experience, reason is an unreliable and inadequate route to knowledge unless it is grounded in the solid bedrock of sense experience and there is no evidence of innate ideas within the mind that are known from experience. The relationship between our thoughts and the world around us consisted of concepts which were developed from these philosophers. I have argued that Locke, Berkeley and Hume are three empiricists that have different believes.

    Read More

  • How Did Rene Descartes Influence Western Philosophy

    990 Words  | 2 Pages

    One of his many works of literature was called the “Two Treaties on Government.” This novel talked about men having rights, which are “life, liberty, and property” and that the government must protect these rights. Locke studied medicine at Oxford University. After fulfilling his dream of becoming a doctor, he went to London to work for his close friend Lord Ashley. Locke’s works inspired French writer Voltaire, and many more young students.

    Read More

  • John Locke's Theory of Knowledge

    1557 Words  | 4 Pages

    Locke’s Essay is very much an epistemological work. This is a very modest description of his aims, but the work is really much more than this, attempting to establish in a general way the limits of the human understanding. Locke purpose is to inquire into the original, certainty, and extent of human knowledge, together with the grounds and degrees of belief, opinion and assent, without meddling with the physical consideration of the mind. He is concerned about the limits of the human understanding, a preoccupation which was to become common in the philosophy that followed his.

    Read More

  • The Progression Of The State Of Nature, By John Hobbes

    1612 Words  | 4 Pages

    Unlike Hobbes, Locke believed there are parameters that a monarch must respect or else he or she can be justifiably deposed. The monarch in the Lockean vision should only use his power “to no other end, but the peace, safety, and public good of the people” (379). If, instead, the monarch chooses “to impoverish, harass, or subdue” its citizens, their government is illegitimate and thus can be overthrown (386). Monarchs, instead of having arbitrary authority, are bound by the rule of law. This contrasts starkly with Hobbesian vision of a monarch that is the embodiment of the law and thus can do whatever he or she wants with impunity. The rule of law is independent of the monarch, for Locke says that “the king’s authority being given to him only by the law, he cannot empower anyone to act against the law, or justify him, by his commission, in so doing”

    Read More

More about John Locke

Open Document