Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of celebrity culture
Celebrity influence behavior effects on society
Media impact on celebrities
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In Katrina Onstad’s essay, “John Lennon, Michael Jackson: Do Celebrities Die Anymore?” Onstad examines the progression of marketing images and works of dead celebrities, society’s reaction to this marketing strategy, and media industry insights into the phenomena. Throughout the essay, Onstad provides examples of digitally reanimated celebrities interacting with us, the living, long after their deaths and the ease with which technology accomplishes this. Onstad points to a potential *Celebrity Zero* as Elvis Presley, whose image would begin to appear on consumer goods such as t-shirts and kitschy wall art only a few years after his death. Onstad also discusses the progression of the public’s view on exhuming the famous, which has gone from
This essay is based on the biography of the life of John Lennon, life with Yoko Ono and the murderer Mark Chapman. It is an essay on based his way of life, and his achievements obtained til the day of his death.
On the evening of February 9, 1964, The Beatles made their American television debut and shook Americans by storm. The four lads from Liverpool redefined American culture, popular music, and traditional standards of living. After The Ed Sullivan show, The Beatles became a worldwide household name, and millions of people around the world began to get sucked into a world where The Beatles were like royalty. For the ten years The Beatles were collectively together as a group, they changed the way people dressed, thought of music, changed cultural views of sex, and race, and ultimately changed music and culture permanently. The Beatles never realized the effect that their influence would have on the public, they just wanted to play music in America. As an avid Beatles fan, I have always been intrigued about The Beatles influence on the world, especially in America. I pondered different issues within The Beatles change, and I found myself asking: how did the Beatles’ dependence on counter-culture change and image change music industry and The American public? Although The Beatles did not intend to change American culture, The Beatles changed America by helping bridge the gap between set gender roles, helping shift public opinion towards the civil rights and anti-war movements, and their devilishly good looks and marketing team were able to transform The Beatles into a band everyone knew and loved.
Equally important JL Racing uses celebrity marketing as most recently in their cycling line Nicky Haden. Celebrity endorsement is a highly effective strategy to gain consumer interests and brand loyalty in a cluttered marketplace. Furthermore, as stated in (Hung, K. 2014) celebrity endorsement literature in three ways. First, it delineates aspiration and play as two main types of motives consumers hold toward celebrities in the entertainment process. This complements current studies that regard celebrities as opinion experts and credible spokespersons in their buying decisions. Second, It centers on the encounters between the consumer and the celebrity in various media contexts, such as movies, shows, and games. As studies on celebrity worship
As stated in his award-winning song Imagine, “Imagine all the people living life in peace.” By that eight word snippet from one of John Lennon’s most respected pieces of art, you should be able to tell what kind of man he was. Most people know him as one of the four of, in my opinion, of the most legendary bands of all time, The Beatles. One who inspired millions to pursue their dreams, passions, and anything their heart desired. Let me ask you one question, when you think of John Lennon, what do you think of? Do you think of his long hair? The round glasses that were always placed on the bridge of his peculiar nose? The leading reason as to why The Beatles went their own way? You probably don’t think of him as a hero. The stereotypical “hero” type is usually wearing a cape of some sorts, has a cliche catch line, unrealistic powers, and has a color scheme that matches every single thing they own, if you’re batman and you have a basic, overused color, then you’re in good shape. Everything comes in black right? If you’re anything like me, not all heroes have all of those things. My hero wrote legendary songs, inspired millions to do more than just go to comic con to catch a glimpse at a forty year old man with a leotard
The use of a celebrity's advertising a product is a smart and efficient way to get the attention of the public, and to sell product as fast as possible. Sue Juzui in her opinion she argues that we should boycott the use of celebrity and legislate rules and guidelines for advertisement. The author supports her argument by first stating her side of the argument. She continues by saying that “the use of celebrity to sell a product is misleading and insults the intelligence of the audience”. The author’s purpose is to persuade her reader in order to boycott the use of celebrity advertising any kind of product. The author creates a judgemental tone for her audience. Juzui’s argument is invalid because small businesses, companies, and everyday common people should advertise their product as a way they feel needed, to sell their product.
A star can only have a positive representation, if the means of media wasn’t so influential on the many fans who glorify their art. Although the media seeks to destroy this ‘glorified’ image that many fans have set in their minds. For Whitney Houston the media representation, destroyed her somewhat angelic image. Most of her negative features were exposed through emotive, figurative and colloquial language in Mark Seal’s article for Vanity Fair, “The Devils in Diva” written in 2012.
Hanusch, F, 2010. ‘Representing death in the news : journalism, media and mortality’ Published by Palgrave Macmillan.
The image creation of a celebrity is a bit of a causality dilemma; trying to distinguish if celebrities make their own image and decide what they’re famous for, or if the common people prescribe a celebrity's image, is likely a futile effort. The culture of celebrity can be seen as a democratized process h...
Chris Hedges and George Monbiot both share similar ideas to express their views on celebrities and the consumer culture which, surrounds us almost every second of the day in our lives. Albeit, they do have similarities they also have differences and express their ideas in a slightly unique way from one another. Whether or not we choose to interact or pay attention to that part of society it is still there regardless if we try to ignore it. Nevertheless, both of these writers try to enlighten us on consumer and celebrity culture and how they can sometimes be detrimental to individuals in society. First, I will examine and explain Chris Hedges’ text, then I would do the same for George Monbiot and his text.
It all started in Liverpool. On July 7, 1940 Ringo Starr was born as Richard Starkey. Not much later, on October 9, 1940 John Lennon was born as John Winston Lennon. Two years later, Paul McCartney was born as James Paul McCartney on June 18. Then on February 25, 1943 George Harrison was born. The early days of the Beatles were as a small group called the Quarry Men. John formed the group with his school friend Pete Shotton in March 1957; a few months later Paul joined (Spencer 12). In February 1958, George meets John and Paul and is invited to join the band.In late 1961, during a trip to Paris, John and Paul get a new hairstyle, the Beatles trademark – the ‘mop top.’ Then, in early 1962, the Beatles sign a management contract with Brian Epstein.
Ketsoglou, Eve-Michelle. “When Good Celebrities Go Bad: Examining Celebrity Worship.” Mount Saint Mary College Journal of Psychology Research Proposals 3 (2013):17-21.Web.16 Apr. 2014.
John Lennon was born on October 9th 1940 in Liverpool, England 1. His father left the family to sail the seas before Lennon’s earliest childhood memory and his mother was taken away by a car accident when he was 18 2. A year after his mother’s death, the Vietnam War took place, which is The United State’s longest military dispute ever. The world famous band, The Beatles, debut on 1961 not long after the start of the war and through this band, Lennon was able to demonstrate his feelings to the people across the world. "Revolution," performed by The Beatles, was created in 1968, when the anti-war demonstration was on the move. After the separation of The Beatles in 1969, Lennon composed the song "Imagine" (1971) 3. This song proves that Lennon is a Peace-Loving-Atheist and a "Voluntarist" 4 that believes in the scheme that people’s ideas can change social reality; however simultaneously admits that there are constantly wars going on in the world. As a result, he could be a mixture of all four, Realist, Liberal, Marxist and Constructivist. On December 8th 1980, approximately five years after the end of the Vietnam War, Lennon was assassinated by Mark Chapman 5. It is not for certain that the word assassination could be used on a singer, song writer who also published books. However there is no doubt about the fact that Lennon touched many people’s hearts around the world and maybe was even praised as an almighty figure.
Movie stars. They are celebrated. They are perfect. They are larger than life. The ideas that we have formed in our minds centered on the stars that we idolize make these people seem inhuman. We know everything about them and we know nothing about them; it is this conflicting concept that leaves audiences thirsty for a drink of insight into the lifestyles of the icons that dominate movie theater screens across the nation. This fascination and desire for connection with celebrities whom we have never met stems from a concept elaborated on by Richard Dyer. He speculates about stardom in terms of appearances; those that are representations of reality, and those that are manufactured constructs. Stardom is a result of these appearances—we actually know nothing about them beyond what we see and hear from the information presented to us. The media’s construction of stars encourages us to question these appearances in terms of “really”—what is that actor really like (Dyer, 2)? This enduring query is what keeps audiences coming back for more, in an attempt to decipher which construction of a star is “real”. Is it the character he played in his most recent film? Is it the version of him that graced the latest tabloid cover? Is it a hidden self that we do not know about? Each of these varied and fluctuating presentations of stars that we are forced to analyze create different meanings and effects that frame audience’s opinions about a star and ignite cultural conversations.
When it comes to the topic of should the private lives of famous people be off limits to the media, most of us will readily agree that no private life should be entirely off limits. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of how the media always finds their way into the life of the artist. Whereas some are convinced that the media should not interfere into the private lives of the celebrity, others maintain that because even if they make a lot of fans happy, they can always live a life of loneliness. I agree that the private lives of a famous person should be off limits to the media because they might have everything in the world but underneath all that they might be living their life melancholy and loneliness.
In many cases if the question "Who is a celebrity?" is asked to the general occupancy of a room, there will be shouts of big names such as "Pat Benetar" or "Jack Black", people who through some way have exposed themselves to the general population's benevolent reception. However, not all names that are given are familiarized with the entirety of the room, whereas an individual currently occupying the room's name may be known to all the other occupants. Unfortunately for this individual this does not mean they have achieved the much hungered for status of Celebrity', simply because people whom have seen the individual day after day know his/her name. The status of celebrity seems to be achieved when a person commands a high level of media of attention or when the celebrity in question obtains a following of people or fans, whose interests are piqued with the actions of the celebrity. It is also a general thought that a celebrity is one who can be considered a role model, someone who the massive population of fans and/or followers adore and wish to make their lives similar to the celebrity they idolize. Although the celebrity is idolized by a large following, this does not necessarily mean that the celebrity is a good role model. However, despite the poor decisions that celebrities often seem to make there is still a crowd following them anticipating how they can emulate the person next. This general assumption can be given what appears to be a solid standing with such things as, Celebrity Branding. There are countless items branded with the names of those seen in the media, from perfumes to clothing to video games, these branded items sell for twice as much as their competitors and also sell twice the quantities. With this kind of example how could anyone argue that the status of celebrity is achieved through any other means than being a highly acclaimed role model for the masses?