John Hammond Should Die

698 Words2 Pages

John Hammond Should Die

John Hammond should get eaten by a dinosaur for creating the park and the dinosaurs. The novel began as a screenplay Crichton wrote in 1983, about a graduate student who recreates a dinosaur. Eventually, given his reasoning that genetic research is expensive and “there is no pressing need to create a dinosaur”, Crichton concluded that it would emerge from a “desire to entertain”, leading to a wildlife park of extinct animals. Originally it was told from the point of view of a child, but Crichton changed it as everyone who read the draft felt it would be better if told by an adult. John Hammond is the most deserving of being eaten by a velociraptor. Hammond should have never created the park because the dinosaurs killed most of the people that worked there. Also the dinosaurs almost killed his grandson that not even with million of dollars it would get his grandson back. Hammond is trying to blame other people for him not to get arrested. But, it really not working how he thinks. He shouldn’t have brought kids to the park because they wouldn’t know how to defend themself. “Hammond seemed to …show more content…

Also they like him because he brought back the dinosaurs and nobody had found the formula to bring them back until he brought them back. Many people may disagree that Hammond should died because he created the park and dinosaurs again and no else had bring dinosaurs back to life. But , if never had created them may be half of the people that worked there wouldn’t have died. Their disagreement is wrong because bringing back dinosaurs is bad because if they escape the island they are going to take over the world. Also he brought them back without the government's permission so they are doing something illegal. If he had never created the park and brought the dinosaurs back people wouldn’t be dead because the dinosaurs killed more than half of the people that worked

Open Document