John Ford Bias

596 Words2 Pages

These two films by John Ford can be described as biased. Biased itself means to be unfairly prejudiced for or against someone or something. We see exceedingly clear examples of this in both films. They portray the Native American in way that denies them of any agency. To anyone without a keen idea to the reality of who Native Americans actually are, they would most likely be terrified of them. They are displayed as being primitive, animalistic savages that only seek to cause violence. We see this all over the early American film industry, discriminating against all different races and cultures. Another example of this would be the Birth of a Nation, in which the white male is the hero who comes to save the day yet again. One of John Ford’s earlier films, Stagecoach, gives the Native American nearly no agency whatsoever. We don’t even see the first Cherokee until late into the film, but even before that the audience develops a stern hatred and fear against them. Examples of this range from the crude dialogue about them to the spine-chilling music played when Cherokee is mentioned. When they finally make an appearance they are displayed just how we expected them to be; ruthless, primitive, and savage. Not once does Ford even lend the opportunity for us to see a different point of view of …show more content…

We are presented a story from the point of view of the white American. With no prior information about the Native American the best way to describe them as would be primitive, animalistic and savage. It is almost ridiculous watching the crude portrayal of the Indians while knowing the reality of who they really are. If anything we are the primitive, animalistic savages. After all we did decimate their entire population by a whooping 80% which exceeds the definition of genocide. Biased would most definitely be the best way to describe both of these films. I think even a Native American watching either of these films would be rooting for John

Open Document