Jim Crow Policing Summary

732 Words2 Pages

“Racial profiling punishes innocent individuals for the past actions of those who look and sound like them. It misdirects crucial resources and undercuts the trust needed between law enforcement and the communities they serve. It has no place in our national discourse, and no place in our nation's police departments” -Benjamin Todd Jealous. In the article “Jim Crow Policing” by Bob Herbert, an accredited African American journalist and recipient of the Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, he argues that the usage of racial profiling should have no place in American society. He supports his argument by first introducing the ongoing issue of racial discrimination, then providing multiple statistics on police stops, and finally explaining the …show more content…

Although, many misunderstood people believe this false accusation, “Contraband, which usually means drugs, was found in only 1.6 percent of the stops of black New Yorkers. For Hispanics, it was just 1.5 percent. For whites, who are stopped far less frequently, contraband was found 2.2 percent of the time” (Para 3). Despite having less of a chance of being pulled over, whites often have more illegal items on them than people of color. Minorities are stopped and frisked because of the way they are perceived as a whole, even though studies clearly prove they are not caught with more contraband. In addition to being in possession of less contraband, “the percentages that yielded weapons were even smaller. Weapons were found on just 1.1 percent of the blacks stopped, 1.4 percent of the Hispanics, and 1.7 percent of the whites” (Para 4). With relation to the last statistic, blacks and Hispanics are disproportionately seen as gun bearing criminals without sufficient evidence to back up the rumors. Whites, though interrogated a fair amount less, tend to escape any harsh critique due to the privileged role they play in

Open Document