On May 2, 2016 Jill Filipovic wrote an article in the New York Times that addresses the topic of women in power and how women can be at a disadvantage due to the fact that they just simply are not a man. Filipovic started her article by addressing the topic of race and how Representative Donna Edwards was accused of playing the race card during her election. In todays society many women have a hard time getting hired, trusted to execute a role, or even getting paid less by companies. Due to these issues many women such as Hillary Clinton is now being accused of “playing the women card” in her debates for presidency. The purpose of this piece of rhetoric is to argue that women are not just “playing the woman card” but that discrimination …show more content…
As many of these issues are addressed daily, we have to take into consideration that a lot of these claims can be considered ethical in reasoning. In this instance, Jill Filipovic uses rational arguments to provide examples and studies to build a case that women are not just “playing the women card” but that there are real issues that they face simply because of their gender. Even though there are weaknesses within the evidence and claims being made, Filipovic does not violate any values or falsely misleads her audience. There are no signs of Filipovic attempting to prevent or silence the voices of the other side of the argument. Nor does Filipovic use her article to relay emotional stories of women being discriminated against causing her audience to be overwhelmed, causing them to loose sign in the true issue at hand. It seems that her purpose is to inform the readers in hopes that it will bring about change or awareness. Finally, Filipovic does not, in any way, attack any individuals or groups of people. She does dress the topic of discrimination between men and women but the topic is never addressed
In “In Living Color: Race and American Culture”, Michael Omi claims that racism still takes place in America’s contemporary society. According to Omi, media and popular culture shape a segregating ideology by giving a stereotypical representation of black people to the public, thus generating discrimination between races (Omi 115:166). In “Bad Feminist: Take One”, Roxane Gay discusses the different roles that feminism plays in our society. She argues that although some feminist authors and groups try to create a specific image of the feminist approach, there is no definition that fully describe feminism and no behaviors that can make someone a good feminist or a bad feminist (Gay 304:306). Both authors argue
illustrates the discrimination against women and the issues that arise from a gender double standard society.
The article, “Why We Still Need Feminism”, written by Casey Cavanaugh (2014), describes how women are treated and why feminism is looked at in such a negative light. She focuses on how the feminism movement doesn’t only concentrate on women and what concerns them, she also talks about how the movement can positively impact all humans. Cavanaugh explains how the treatment of women can go on for generations and how many women are simply dealing with the ill-treatment (Cavanaugh, 2014). The writer gives a few examples of how women are treated and the different ways that it can be changed for the better.
Being a woman I will always be at a disadvantage to men and other women who are white. Men and white women are seen to be superior by society. Peggy McIntosh, American radical feminist and anti-racism activist, stated in “White Privilege and Male Privilege,” “…I have noticed men’s unwillingness to grant that they are over privileged in the curriculum, even though they may grant that women are disadvantaged” (McIntosh 140). Men are in denial that they are over privileged and does not admit it because of society. Society make men believe that they are superior then women. I think it is wrong because I am a woman and if I wanted to be a CEO of a company, it would be harder for me become one than it would be for a man. Even if I do become one through hard work, I would still be paid less than any men who are CEOs and I would be seen as a bitch. I feel that if I can do anything any other man can do, I should get paid the same by my abilities and not by what my sex is. Not only are women less privileged than men, but also white women. “I can turn on the television or open to the front page of the paper and see people of my race widely and positively represented,” stated McIntosh (142). She doesn’t worry about people seeing her as a problem because she is white. On the television or in the newspaper, African Americans have a negative representation and are seen as the “problem” of today’s
Catherine Rampell, a respected journalist for The Washington Post, wrote an article titled, “Be Pretty, But Not Too Pretty: Why Women Can’t Just Win.” This article talks about how women in the work place are ridiculed for how they look and how they act in corporate and political America. Women are struck with different stereotypes in the work place on a daily basis. Rampell gives examples of real life experiences with people in politics such as Hilary Clinton and Sarah Palin. Both of them have been mocked for how they express their feelings too much or if they do not express much at all. Rampell also talks about an experience that she had where a man came up
News outlets proclaimed 2008 to be the Year of Women. Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton were both running high profile campaigns for Vice President and President respectively, and Nancy Pelosi was Speaker of the House. Many believed the political glass ceiling for women had been at the very least cracked, possibly shattered. But in hindsight it was the opposite of that. Both Palin and Clinton lost their political races, and, to some, became objects of national ridicule. These sexists’ attacks against both c...
Schnall states her book “What will it take to make a women president? Conversations about women, leadership and power.” Declaring that Schnall has a book is a way of self-promotion which can come across as arrogant, but also knowledgeable. Schnall continues to inform that she has interviewed nearly 50 influential men and women about what factors keep women achieving fairness in leadership positions. Schnall starts her article with confidence and devotion for her argument. Schnall’s introduction paragraph starts with slight interest in the first sentence and ends with a powerful statement on injustice for women who desire success in society. Schnall’s conclusion of the article uses a call to action both for the pedestrian and the media. Schnall advocates that the “press cover a woman’s campaign the same way as a man’s.” Schnall also declares that “the media must become more self-aware.” Both statements desire equality for gender and cautiousness for the media. Schnall’s call to action is plausible and effective because she highlights ways in which if the double standard for the portrayal of men and women is not upheld then the audience can decide to not read the paper, or not visit the website or not listen to the radio as a sign of feasible
Sarah Grey’s article discusses Gloria Steinem’s recent statement about women’s involvement in the political sphere. She trivialized women’s ability to make autonomous decisions by implying that they simply follow and replicate men’s decisions. By stating that “the only reason millennial women overwhelmingly support Bernie Sander for the Democratic nomination is that we want to impress men”, she fails to recognize that individual women are capable of making decisions without male influence. Sarah Grey argues that Steinem’s statement is representative of imperial feminism and thus, as white woman of privilege within our political landscape, inherently benefits from the structures of power currently in place. Gloria Steinem advocacy for reformist
One thousand years go by and an abundant amount of people still view women in a stereotypical type of way. On the opposing view, if women did not overstretch the slightest of things, this wouldn’t be such an enormous issue. Women may be overreacting to what the media has to say about them. It is not affecting everybody but a vast majority of successful women from continuing to moving forward said Marianne Schnall. Important to realize, women are capable of doing jobs men can do. Such jobs as being an engineer, physician, mechanic, lawyer and even top notch business women! Up to the present time there is an ongoing public debate on women suffering from double standards. If it makes a female feel threatened or belittled than it may be sexist. A very interesting article this came to be because the writer had numerous accountants to keep her argument steady. A worthy writer brings up present time activities, statistics, and people being affected by the scenario and provides the reader some closure. With a devastatingly crucial issue such as women being shunned by the media, it’s not okay to have the ideas of other people in your work. In the article, “Controversial Hillary Cover of Time Illuminates Sexism in the Media” by Marianne Schnall, implies that the media is negatively affecting the chances of women becoming successful with all the sexism it is portraying. Marianne Schnall is a published writer and professional interviewer with many influential credentials that she in not afraid to use.
One major factor in why women did not reach equality in America in the past century was their underrepresentation in local, state, and federal politics. Between 1917, when Jeanette Rankin became the first woman to serve in the United States Congress, and 2000, only 219 women have been elected as US representatives or senators. Of these, only 28 have been women of color. In contrast, in the 20th century over a thousand men served in Congress, and 132 men of color. In the 106th United States Congress (which met from 1999-2001) only 58 of the 535 legislators were women, and only 18 were women of color. As a result, laws that benefitted women faced heavy opposition before they could be passed. In addition, women made up the minority of Supreme Court justices and presidential cabinet members at every point in the 20th century, and of the 15 presidents...
Women of power are treated very poorly. These women of power include politicians, doctors, lawyers and businesswomen. Arguably, female politicians receive the worst treatment of all. Everything they do is constantly under media scrutiny, like what they wear and what they say, much more so than their male counterparts. The difference in the number of men and women congress members is vast, almost 5 to 1. Many women shy away from the political light for these reasons. An article, “Women in Politics”, written by Kenneth Jost, he explains the feats of women in the past 100 years:
America is a hotspot for diversity. People from all over the world migrate to the states due to economic opportunities, more recognized freedoms and liberties, educational programs, occupational training, and many more. Even though the principles that the United States were founded on value freedom of expression and equal opportunities to all, there are systems of power that are deeply entrenched in the country’s foundation. Things such as racism and homophobia have plagued society but been appropriated in educational spaces, workplaces, media and popular culture. Sexism and discrimination based on gender can be seen on different platforms extending from simple catcalling on the street to provocative target advertising and reach as far as unfair discrepancies in pay. Nonetheless, the experiences of women in America are very different from the happy, dainty narratives that are seen through a masculine gaze.
Hillary Clinton was the embodiment of the establishment in an era of transparency when the new media has changed not just how much information the public can access but also how people think about wealth inequality and existing political power structures. Her dogged sense of entitlement and her insistence to women that the historical significance of her candidacy should galvanize them was out of sync in a generation when younger women believe gender is a fluid concept. Both younger and older women felt patronized by her appeals to their womanhood. Her strategy particularly fell flat with older women who recalled how Hillary treated Bill Clinton’s many accusers of inappropriate and even illegal behavior. Moreover, men and women alike were disturbed
Women for many years have been denied the right to express themselves. If a female spoke against something she was considered strange and out of line. Hall says, “Feminist methodologies are the belief that patriarchal oppression of women. has been profound and multifaceted” (Hall 202).... ...
The PowerPoint presentation for Unit 3 discussed sex and gender, gender stereotypes and explored terms like transgender and transsexuals. Some generations ago, it was commonplace for men to be the head of the household and the sole breadwinners. Women were expected to cook, clean, look after the children and have a hot, homemade supper ready for their husbands when they came home from work. In today’s society, these standards are not so stringently adhered to. Women can be just as competitive as men in many facets of life and many men are content to be “Mr. Mom”. I also chose to discuss the article “White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack”. Peggy McIntosh, the author of the article states that white privilege is alive and well in today’s society despite the fact that people in the United States do not think they are racist because they were “taught to recognize racism only as an individual acts of meanness of members of my group, never in invisible systems conferring unsought racial dominance on my group from birth”. We