Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Personality traits within employment
Personality traits within employment
Which personality trait has the most effect on job performance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Personality traits within employment
A society depends on the differences of its citizens to succeed. Many people argue that when everyone does things in the exact same manner, a society becomes an utopian-ideal. Unfortunately, an utopian world does not exist, since people are not computer-generated robots. Some people sometimes accomplish things more efficiently and faster when they are focused or not in a crowded place, or they may focus better while listening to music or being around familiar things. For example, a colleague of James Watson, a great scientist who accomplished many remarkable things, was always “lounging around, arguing about problems instead of doing experiments.” Although this scientist attacked things differently, he was able to solve “the greatest of all biological problems: the discovery of the structure of DNA.” James Watson did not sit at a desk and crack his mind; he was just loose and not thinking about …show more content…
Other scientists of his time thought that his idea would never be useful, and thought that he was being silly. Although Robert Goddard faced this harsh criticism, he believed in himself, and began launching rockets. From Clark University, he gained recognition, and he opened the doors to a field of science called rocket science. His brilliant discoveries is what formed NASA, and is now considered to be the father of modern rocketry. Another example similar to this one is the Beatles. This band had been told from recording companies that their style of music was not good and they needed to change it. Of course, the band didn’t change their style, and instead, just left the company. They continued playing and singing in their own ways, and invented rock and roll. They continued playing in their own style, and won 11 Grammys. They have influenced the music world, and made an achievement they could have done if they had changed their music
In this world there are millions upon millions of people that roam around the earth in there own special, little life. Every person is different than the next one and he or she has their own personality. Each person also deals with life differently than the next. If everyone was the same, then we would be like one giant colony of ants. Just following the ant in front of us, and everyone looking the same as the next. Not having any of there own ideas or thoughts of what to do and how to do it.
Technology can only take a generation so far; it is the imagination and creativity of an individual that will take the world they live in to a level that technology can only build; a world where highways of a person’s thoughts make the world thrive. In the 19th century it was believed technology had been exhausted, and then individuals, such as Einstein, Planck, and Fleming, took science on their backs and brought their own ideas to life. A generation can thrive together as one, but only through the minds of lone thinkers, who alone can move a generation out of one era and into another. Anthem, a novella written by Ayn Rand, talks of a time where the minds of individuals were eradicated, and a community of clone-like minds replaced creativity and individualism with a sole idea of uniformity. Equality 7-2521 knew that technology was something that could be used for greatness, “This has never been done before, but neither has such a gift as ours ever been offered to men,”(61) but for the world he lived in, technology was an atrocity.
...nging as we negotiate positions in social situations. There seems to be the familiar, age old, argument of nature vs. nurture which is no doubt part of a much wider debate.
Where would music be had it not been for the men that stepped before him. The Mozarts and Beethovens, who wrote the music that today is known as the classics. These men were naturals in their own right, but these people wrote their music in the 17th and 18th century. Many people don't realize all of the changes that music had to go through between that period of music and the present day. One such musician stands alone at the top as one of the movers and innovators of the 20th century. He is Duke Ellington. Along with his band, he alone influenced millions of people both around the world and at home. He gave American music its own sound for the first time. Winton Marsalis said it best when he said "His music sounds like America." These days you can find his name on over 1500 CS's. Duke's legacy will live on for generations to come.
There are some human phenomena, which seem to be the result of individual actions and personal decisions. Yet, these phenomena are often - on closer inspection – as much a result of social factors as of psychological ones.
Today, we live on earth holding approximately seven million people. Taking a closer look at the number of people we begin to take notice that not one person is identical to the other. What is it that makes us, as individuals, different from the rest of society? “We come into this little world with our own little nature, our own pattern of behavior, and our own natural reaction to people” (Littauer and Sweet 18). Not only do our features on the outside tell us apart from one another but our personalities also set us aside from others. Personality defends us as our own person. Personality is an individual’s process of thinking, feeling, and taking action toward something. Research helps to define the discovering, structuring, and the understanding
For instance, the roles of each gender in the society became more pronounced and leaders came into power to establish power and order in each society. In a productive society, each individual has a certain role to play to carry out specific tasks. In the essay Homogenization of the Human Experience by Scott Atran, he describes the importance of cultural cooperation and creativity within and between groups in order to increase competition in creating innovations in the society. Atran also emphasizes the the importance of “tolerating diversity” and “respecting nature” is barely acknowledging the
People are rarely able to predict with any accuracy between how they will feel in the future, and so are often quite wrong about what will make them happy. Thus, when people meet problems, they always ask someone else to give them opinions. In the essay “Reporting Live from Tomorrow”, Daniel Gilbert suggests that beliefs, just like genes, can be “super-replicators”, given to spreading regardless of their usefulness. Thus even beliefs that are based on inaccurate information can provide the means for their own propagation. Finally, he finds people just want to get happiness from beliefs. Moreover, as the advent of science era, technology works as a surrogate to help people solve problems and get happiness. In the essay
...onflict. The minimization of groupthink makes people to be extra willing to make and articulate new ideas that help the team grow. Indeed, people living in an individualistic culture display more creativity compared to those from a collectivist culture. It enables them to concentrate on their strong points without getting afraid that they will be punished because of deviating from the set standards. It is this conflict of thoughts that creates competition that improves business as well as develops an efficient society. The author explains this using this quotation, “Know what you want in life and go after it. I worship individuals for their highest possibilities as individuals, and I loathe humanity, for its failure to live up to these possibilities” (Rand). What she means here is that an individual can attain anything if he or she maximizes his or her potential.
Obviously, people differ in numerous ways, so what does that mean for businesses? Well, when work groups are comprised of people with different backgrounds, cultures and lifestyles, promoting teamwork and smooth interactions can be challenging. Finding new ways to work together will require thinking about people’s differences, not to divide, separate or exclude, but to take advantage of those differences. When people engage in divergent thinking, they put themselves in a highly exploratory mode, drawing from more of their total life experience to help solve a particularly difficult problem or to discover new and better alternatives to doing things.
The roles of diversity and uniqueness are a crucial part of society today. Without these qualities being enforced into the American character, people won't produce thoughtful ideas that could help shape America. Both authors illustrate the evil effect of conformity in society and support how one should be self reliant, not phony, and confident in their own beliefs and ideas.
Have you ever imagined the world, buildings, people, being all the same? Many people are similar in so many ways, but they do not notice because they are picking out the differences in the world. However, many people have unique differences that make people special and different. In “Sloppy People vs. Neat People,” the author Suzanne Britt writes about how she believes neat people are lazy and rude. While sloppy people have ambitions to clean but when they do clean the mess just gets worse. In the other article “Batting Clean-Up and Striking Out,” the author Dave Barry writes how women can see the smallest specks of dirt and make a big deal about how the bathroom is a mess. While men make a big deal about sports, when sport games are on, men
mud in that way and then only when you sit on the left-hand side of
If social institutions do not embrace the concept of Intellectual Diversity, then future adults are somewhat doomed because both perceptio...
“The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefor, all progress depends on the unreasonable man” (George Bernard Shaw)