Jacques Austerlitz Research Paper

1260 Words3 Pages

Jacques Austerlitz, the eponymous character of W.G. Sebald’s Austerlitz, displays many of the characteristic signs of a traumatized subject: he is sensitive to the suffering and captivity of others, he continually experiences uncanny feelings in his surroundings, his perception of time is fractured, and he finds himself following inexplicable inner compulsions. All these aspects of trauma are reflected in his perception of the architectural structures and landscapes that he studies. In fact, as Austerlitz recounts his life, it becomes apparent that his obsession with the structures of architecture and their significance is ultimately an obsession with repressed memory. While Austerlitz’s initial perception of architectural sites is inextricably …show more content…

Initially, Austerlitz claims, it had “never occurred to [him] to wonder about [his] true origins” (125), despite the fact that as a young student he had discovered his birth name was Jacques Austerlitz and not Dafydd Elias. The recovery of lost memory becomes an obsession replacing the perpetual accumulation of architectural knowledge, which, he explains, “served as a substitute for compensatory memory” (140). The layers of history which he uncovers at each architectural site, and the eventual ruination of the buildings he studies, speak of his connection with disaster and trauma that point towards the history of the Holocaust, a history which he refuses to acknowledge, but which is undeniably his. Austerlitz, before learning of his history and journey on the kindertransport, studies a certain time period and avoids all knowledge of both the history and landscape of Germany, seeking to repress his suspicions about his history. However, he can no longer continue to deny the truth of his past, “I realized…how little practice I had in using my memory, and...always have tried to recollect as little as possible, avoiding everything, which related in any way to my unknown past…I was always refining my defensive reactions, creating a...quarantine or immune system which…protected me from anything that could be connected in any way, however distant, with my own early history.” (139-140) Although Austerlitz has avoided all knowledge of the history of the twentieth century, and that of Germany in particular, the buildings that he studies point towards both their own ruination and the destruction of the society that built them. Therefore, in his encounters with these buildings, Austerlitz is faced with their narratives of the historical devastation he seeks to avoid.

Open Document