Jacob Burckhardt Compare Contrast

1632 Words4 Pages

In our modern lives today we live in a world of malls, fashion, cellphone, sports cars and drones. Everyday there is something new to add to what we define as modern. Whether it’s a new television show, new brand of shoe or some accessory for our pets what we define as modern is ever changing. R. W. Southern and Jacob Burckhardt have both made valid points about the making of the Modern Ages; however, they both are very subjective in their viewpoints. Burckhardt insists the idea of modernity came from the Renaissance in Italy in the fourteenth and fifteenth century. But R.W. Southern suggests that the Renaissance in Northern France during the eleventh and twelfth century was the beginning for the modern mindset.* Each has also described how …show more content…

When southern speaks of the growth of government he speaks of a system which advantages were based on geography. “It was no accident that after the confusion of the 10th century the strongest governmental units appeared where there was least in the way of marsh, mountain or forest to separate one community from another – … which added to his misery in one way – saved him from the misery of organized tyranny.” The governmental set up of early Italy although run by tyrants like Frederick II seemed to be set up as our modern government is today. The tendency to encourage an individualistic personality and break off one’s self as an individual resulted in many kinds of self-expression some of them even aggressive. In these times it was obvious that the Italian peninsula had a great deal of tyrant rulers. Burckhardt adds a quote that “Absolute power, with its temptations to luxury and unbridled selfishness, and the perils to which he was exposed from enemies and conspirators, turned him almost inevitably into a tyrant”. The despots Burckhardt speaks about were not granted the freedom of individuality. Starting in the fifteenth century however the character of the despot began to be …show more content…

Burckhardt discusses the changes in identity from “some general category” to “the subjective side at the same time asserted itself with corresponding emphasis; man became a spiritual individual” . Banishment and solidarity also played a role in individualism because the separation from the state and church lead to cosmopolitanism; men of the world. Burckhardt discusses the development of free personality in northern Europe. This is where Burckhardt adds in how writers and poets showcase the accomplishments of individuals in the subsection Glory. In the next subsection Ridicule and Wit. Burckhardt captures the satire/wit of an individual along with the intellectual dexterity. Southern however believes that the authority of logic is what happened to bring out change in personalities and attitudes. Southern also adds with the idea that with solitude the individual has the right mindset to actually become an individual in northern France. He argues, once the church has been separated from secular life it made religious life a spiritually mature and sophisticated matter. This gives off the idea that the church is the reason behind individualistic attitudes; with a new way of thought and feelings. This is not to be confused with Burckhardt’s way of thinking about the church because

Open Document