More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of culture on communication
How do cultural differences affect cross cultural communications
Cultural differences and communication
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of culture on communication
When it comes to my opinion when regrading how cultures affects communication, I think culture can affect how communication is received. Someone may come off as being offensive, depending on how you communicate with a particular culture. For example, in the National Football League (NFL), one team in particular, Washington Redskins, some cultures within the Native American's deem the term Redskins to be offensive. Most football fans, not all, view said offensive team named, not offensive. However, what right does someone have to tell another culture what should, or shouldn't be offensive? Personally, I think if said name offends a portion of the population, what harm is it to just change the bigotry name? As a result, some of the reports
Being Chinese, I understand first hand how discriminatory words can impact the way that you view yourself. I was really able to relate to Christine Leong’s, “Being a Chink”, and was able to empathize with her feelings of anguish over having a loved one called a derogatory name. Many times I have been made fun of due to my small eyes, flat face, and short stature, all of which are common traits that most Chinese people share. I have been treated differently, asked absurd questions, and been stereotyped all because of my ethnicity. The multiple times I’d been made fun of because I was Chinese are vividly burned into my memory, I can even remember the outfit I was wearing. That just goes to show how powerfully words can affect someone. My
If we started all over before any names were made and altered these names towards other races how would people react? Lets take the Cleveland Indians for example. What would happen if we had used the Jews, Blacks or Chinese as this political cartoon suggests. Every race involved would have been in an uproar when the caricature came out. They would feel that their constitutional rights were being ignored. But, when "Chief Wahoo of the Cleveland Indians, runs about drunkenly at baseball games"1 they feel that it is ok to disregards the Indian name, heritage, and ritual. Taking in the psychological considerations for the Native Americans "dehumanization, as the word implies, is a psychological process that reduces a person or group to a sub-human level. One...
Recently, the use of controversial words has become a heavily debated topic, as seemingly truthful statements to some, cause insult to others. The Times article "Why 'Redskins' Is a Bad Word", by acclaimed linguist and professor John McWhorter, was published in 2015, around when the use of the word "Redskins" was being debated in Californian public schools through Bill AB-30 (2015). In the article, McWhorter aims to clarify the condemnation of the word "Redskins" (McWhorter,2015, para. 1), by suggesting the offence does not stem from the literal definition of such words, but instead the negative and often derogatory connotations the words have. McWhorter begins by introducing the recent discussions surrounding the use of the word "Redskins" (McWhorter,2015, para. 1). He informs readers of the emotions attached to controversial words in the examples and describes how words continue to evolve as time goes on. Alongside his reputation as a credible person, a quote from a distinguished professor, and anecdotal story, McWhorter provokes an emotional connection with the readers
creates unwanted bias between cultures as they clash on a daily basis. A number of those who
The Washington Redskins professional football team has thousands of fans that believe that taking away the name of the football would also take away their legacy. A poll created by ESPN’s “Outside the Lines” got results back that say “71 percent [of Americans believe the name Redskins] “should not” be changed” (Clement). This shows that the majority of Americans think that the word Redskins in this case is not offensive to the Native Americans and that the team should not have to change their name because a few Native Americans find the word racist. Another poll from Annenberg Public Policy Center asked Native Americans if they found the football team’s name offensive, ninety percent said that the name was acceptable (“Washington Redskins Name: An Intelligent Discussion”). This comes to show that the very people this name is supposed to offend find the name acceptable and do not believe the Washington Redskins are racist. However, the other side does believe that public opinion is showing that the football team Washington Redskins is offending Native Americans. In a poll from Oneida Indian Nation who surveyed Washington area residents found that fifty-nine percent of Native Americans have the right to be offended (“Washington Redskins Name: An Intelligent Discussion”). This may be the truth for Americans in the Washington area, but the polls people
For instance, in the show Freaks and Geeks, we find individuals, calling themselves freaks, because they do not belong in the ‘status quo,’ and live or desire to live alternative lifestyles. Would this be disrespectful to individuals who according to 19th and 20th century lingo, were called freaks? I think it is highly disrespectful indeed, because in the show, we find these kids who are not disabled, and are all white using a term which has caused so much pain to others,used it in such a free way, to be different and alternate. It goes back to what he was saying about how individuals who identify with the pink triangle and the term freak, need to also be a witness to the pain that other individuals suffered, like the gay POC and non-disabled POC. And it is worse because these kids in no way bear any semblance with either of the categories mentioned. It’s becoming some sort of norm, in which white people of years passed create words which are meant to relegate different individuals to the outside, and then after this relegation is done, choose to use it as freely as they want. For instance the use of the word ‘nigger’, white people want to include this word in their vocabulary so bad, because slavery happened more than 300 years ago. But they forget the pain that comes with this word, but you cannot truly forget what
The institute of Marxism or in other words political correctness, it started in Germany 1923 the main purpose at that time was to find way to implement communism in Russia. As we all know that communism believes in social group not individual. Political correctness deals with social communication it is concerned with replacing offensive words that are considered as discriminating against certain section of society. Robert Allen also defined political correctness by saying “the political correctness movement is also devoted to promoting an alternative terminology that seeks to assert a move positive aspect to negative qualities”. from the begging of the term political correctness it went through three stages the first used favorable to those whose views remained in sync with every shifting Bolshevik party live, the second stage was in 1960s and again it was used favorably by the new left radicals. The last stage was when it was used negatively by the conservatives in America. Political correctness has three categories the first is offensive like gay or retarded these words refer to people as insults for undesirable concept. The second one is subtle like policeman and mailman, this words effect our way of thinking because they implies that those roles are for men only, the last one is blatant like n-word to refer to black these words are very offensive. In summary politicl correctness is term used to describe language to minimize offence(I love English language). The paper discusses political correctness with articles that are with and another that are against it.
The media has a strong influence on how societies receive and react to the context of the messages that the media displays to the public. From Disney movies on up to horror films there’s a plot that each film is trying to accomplish. The controversial issue comes into play based on how the film messages are portrayed. Films that use racial humor harm the particular race that the films are depicting. Films with racial humor that is enhanced to be seen as acceptable creates prejudge mental labels for certain races. The viewers of these films are more likely to view these stereotypes portrayed in the
Recently, it came to my attention that some publishing companies are considering changing classic works of literature and replacing racially offensive language in these works. I assert that the words should be changed for specific reasons, the most reasonable reason is it being racially offencive. In an instant if anyone would read this book without having any background knowledge, they would definitely feel offended. I strongly feel that if the language and the way the words get changed to something that is more suitable more people would pick up the book and read it.
government has also set an age minimum of seventeen years old to even purchase the
There are right and wrong ways to say something. One way being with sophistication, the other with ignorance. Now if someone is all steamed up about something they heard, and posts their opinion, what makes them think the other person posting their opinion is going to stop, cause that may just make them want to prove their statement more.”Now Cheerios is doubling down on that popular mixed-race family. Their latest installment will debut during the Super Bowl and shows the family breaking some news to that cute little girl.”(Goyette, Branden) Cheerios is a big corporation and did not take this lying down so they made another commercial with the same mixed family to show that those words won't keep them down. Everyone's say is aloud but at what cost, because those bigots didn't help the situation for them, they just hurt
When dealing with social artifacts and images that carry a history and deeper meaning we are talking about traditions of a society. If a part of your culture is emotionally disruptive it would seem wise to be more aware of the harm that could be done, and make a better effort to shield people from harm. Most groups have some images that bring up negative emotions. It’s easy to say “get over it”, but when it’s the other way around it hurts. So we as a society and culture should invest time and effort to target signs of racial charged symbols, and do our best to inform and encourage members of society to be as courteous when
Why is it, that people’s feelings seem to be more important than free speech in today’s society? Is “hate speech” not covered by free speech? this frightening trend present in society – the idea that words cause harm, and should therefore be limited.
Becoming culturally sensitive will have it’s perks but it will also have it’s challenges. The government has decided that we can conquer these challenges because we are strong and independent, but some of us will have struggles with this. Some American citizens are racist, hate certain ethnic groups/religions, etc. They think it is okay to beat these people down with words and even some go to the extreme and physically cause harm. This will be a problem because these people’s view have probably been driven into their heads by some people that they respect and it is too late to fix them. America as a whole must try their best to protect these people from harmful wrongdoings and try to get over this problem because we are all equal and live in a free country.
As in anything in life, there are positive and negative terms that can be detrimental in how a person does and says something and may be offensive to another person. In Diversity a positive term that we should strive to do to contain order would be, Equity, which means to treat everyone equally no matter their culture or race. Equity is very important since it’s the bases of Diversity and should be acknowledged a little more often. Without Equity, there would be no structure in Diversity for anything else, and no admiration between one another. A Negative term for diversity would be Discrimination. Discrimination is the unequal treatment of someone based on their culture or ethnicity. Discriminating someone who might be different than you is very wrong. A person has no need to put down someone just because they might not be the same religion or believe in the same thing as you. We should try to totally eradicate negative terms in order to maintain a culture of diversity and inclusion.