Is Sociology Different From 'Common Sense Or Journalistic' Argument?

472 Words1 Page

What is sociology and in what way is it different from “common sense” assumptions or “journalistic” argument?

Sociology is the systematic study of human behaviour within society, it uses studies and theories to argue perspectives of understandings as to how society is comprised. Once a theory has been made, it is tested in a scientific way to either prove or disprove the theory.

The evidence to prove or disprove a theory is collected through planned research methods and sampling techniques. These give the study a scientific basis with which to compare and contrast, which gives the study a strong standing to base new assumptions and theories.

Sociologists study difference in the norms and values between societies. They examine the forces …show more content…

They are also not subject to any time constraints as sociological studies can continue for months or even years.

There are many similarities between good journalism and sociology in that they are both seeking to collect information about society and its norms, they both try to avoid deliberate biases and use evidence to back up their conclusions.

However journalism is always with time constraints, which causes researchers to cut corners when conducting research. This leads to implicit meanings and assumptions being added to please the assumed audience.

As journalism is designed to be accessible to the general public, with specified audience depending on the format or publication, many scientific or scholarly terms are kept to a minimum and elaborate explanations must be simplified.

Most of the information that is read every day and mistaken for sociology is actually an attempt by one group or another to influence social policy. (Tischler, 2006) This is also true for common sense as it is often mistaken for sociology. Sociological studies, however, often disprove common sense which is usually passed on through word of mouth and is based on personal

Open Document