Is Science Dangerous Ethos Pathos Logos

512 Words2 Pages

Juliet Loewen
WRITING ASSIGNMENT - Rhetorical Analysis
“Is Science Dangerous?” by Professor Lewis Wolpert

I have read the article “Is Science Dangerous?” by Professor Lewis Wolpert. He is a South African-born British developmental biologist, author and broadcaster. Professor Wolpert went to several universities and is well known and recognized by biologists. He has also published several popular science books.
In this rhetorical analysis I will be using the three-part heuristic analyzing technique which is logos, ethos and pathos. Logos is an appeal to logic, and is a way of persuading an audience by reason. Ethos is an appeal to ethics, and it is a means of convincing someone of the character or credibility of the persuader. And pathos is an appeal to emotion, which is a way of convincing an audience of an argument by creating an emotional response. …show more content…

He says that we do not know the exact difference between science and technology, but that danger only appears when we apply science to technology; and that the real problem is in the combination or mixture of both. Furthermore, Professor Wolpert talks about genetics and cloning. He says that “there may be no genetic relation between a mother and a cloned child, but that is true of adoption and cases of IVF.”1 He suggests some guidelines to reduce ethical problems. All scientific ideas should be criticized by others; and that knowledge should be used to do good, not evil. The government and the media should act correctly and take the right decisions related to science and its

Open Document