Is King Hamlet Selfish

646 Words2 Pages

What should be said of a person who kills his own brother to ascend to the throne of Denmark? It is easy to label Claudius as an indefensible murderer, especially because Shakespeare relays many of the events in Hamlet through Prince Hamlet’s perspective. Although Claudius is unquestionably villainous, he is also a highly effective and judicious statesman.
Claudius ends King Hamlet’s life in order to pursue a more sophisticated style of governance. King Hamlet had been a proud, haughty man who took risks with his country. Horatio describes this as a positive characteristic, saying that when the King was challenged, he “Did slay this Fortinbras, who by a sealed compact well ratified by law and heraldry, did forfeit, with his life, all those his lands which he stood seized of to the conqueror” (1.1.85-88). His brash actions were wildly popular in Denmark at the time—Horatio and the guards are awestruck by the bravery that King Hamlet displayed in gambling the country to maintain his pride— but they weren’t the actions of a skillful diplomat. In assassinating the …show more content…

When Hamlet killed Polonius, Claudius could have punished him in any overt manner he chose. However, he had two reasons to suppress the incident: first that Gertrude loved Hamlet and would have wanted him to be protected, and second that Hamlet was quite popular and punishing him would have caused further instability to Claudius’s rule. His solution was to separate Hamlet from Denmark, and have him killed while on a seemingly innocent diplomatic mission to England. This took all the blame off of Claudius, and had it succeeded, would have solved many of Claudius’s problems. The plan, though well thought out, ultimately failed because Hamlet had a stroke of luck in stumbling upon the letter bearing the order to kill him. It shouldn’t be considered a shortcoming on the part of

Open Document