Iron Hypothesis

504 Words2 Pages

The iron hypothesis, created by John Martin, states that if the ocean could be enriched with iron, more phytoplankton blooms could grow that would take the carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere and possibly reverse the greenhouse effect. Martin’s test demonstrated that when you germinate high-nutrient, low-chlorophyll zones in the ocean with iron, you increase the production of phytoplankton blooms, this information proves his hypothesis true. This will improve the earth by making the carbon dioxide return to its natural level in the atmosphere. From that, the ice caps would not melt and animals would not go extinct. If the ice caps do melt, then there would be a worldly flood and the salt water would infect the clean water that we need to live. John Martin’s hypothesis could save the livelihood of humans and animals. …show more content…

The carbon dioxide that is tied up in phytoplankton blooms, are not heavy in order to sink fast or far enough. The carbon dioxide from the atmosphere needs to reach deep sea and the blooms are not filled enough to make it that far. The Atlantic is one of the high-nutrient, low-chlorophyll zones and the phytoplankton blooms need sunlight to grow and live, so in the dark, cold winter, the blooms starve. The spring is when the blooms collect the carbon, however by that time, the blooms are either dead or too weak to take. However, Bishop discovered that the carbon levels decreased in the winter, so the blooms are not missing a lot of carbon. Bishop stated that even though iron is important to the blooms make up, so are the other key elements. Therefor, the blooms need every element to increase their production and to maintain life. So Bishop is not saying John Martin’s hypothesis is wrong, it is just

Open Document