Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Iran-contra affair
The Contra Affair
The iran-contra affair was a huge scandal it is also called a Irangate, Contragate or in other words what people would call it would be the Iran Contra scandal. The affair or scandal pedal faster on the second term of Ronald Reagan is the president of the United States of that time. Administration of the CIA of the senior office of the White House had secretly made the sale of weapons to Iran, it was otherwise known as an arms embargo. what an embargo means is to break the band or trade or other commercial activity with another country but that is what officials were trying to successfully do by re securing the release of U.S hostages and to fund the Contras in Nicaragua.
…show more content…
At the same time there was prisoners in Lebanon that were Americans held hostage, by a group with Iranian connections to the army of guardians of the Islamic Revolution. most of the plans was to ship Israeli weapons to Iran and then the United States will resupply Israel payment then give it to the Contras fighting their own war in Nicaragua against the corrupted government and the rulers of their country.The Iranian promise to do everything to release the hostages so as long as the weapons come in they will release a couple hostages a day if not couple hostages a month. The person that was in charge of the modifications was a devoted leader Colonel Oliver Oliver North of the National Security Council from the 1980s. The portion proceeds from the selling of weapons was going to the anti sandinista to an anti communist rebels at the Contra group in Nicaragua. It was kind of known that Ronald Reagan president like the idea some of the Contra case, which means he might of authorized the money that was getting to the United States by Iran to go to the Contras. There is a note taker called Caspar Weinberger Thomas wrote that he will suspicious of Reagan and aware of potential hostage transfers and Iran, I also knew that there was hot in tow missiles that can level of the whole country going to
middle of paper ... ... In an effort to cover the aid to the Contras and the money connection to Iran, the Enterprise was dissolved and all documents associated with any of it was to be destroyed. All information regarding the Iran-Contra affair could, however, not be covered up or destroyed, and eventually the revelations were so massive that not even Reagan could deny what had happened. The “(.) Iran-Contra, as the Reagan administration operations became known after their revelation, accorded in methods and morality with the general character of American foreign policy during the Cold War.”
Kinzer tells us that the Iranians celebrated their nationalism in taking control of their oil, but their success was a shock to the British multinational companies in Iran. They did not like the idea of Iran nationalization, so they plan a coup to overthrow the Prime Minister Mossadegh. But this plan failed and the British were disarmed and sent back to their country closing down their embassy in Iran. The British tried to present their case to the United State in a way that the United State would intervene. So they presented a case that Mossaghe is not only nationalizing the Iranians oil, he is also leading Iran into communism. This case stirred the American action and they feared if they assassinate Mossaghe, his seat will be open and communist ...
The Iran-Contra affair survives as one of the most dramatic political scandals in American history. Approximately a decade after Watergate, the Iran-Contra scandal both shocked and captivated the public. The affair began in Beirut, 1984, when Hezbollah, a militant Islamic group sympathetic to the Iranian government, kidnapped three American citizens. Four more hostages were taken in 1985. The conservative Reagan administration hurriedly sought freedom for the Americans. Despite a 1979 trade embargo prohibiting the sale of weapons between the U.S. and Iran, members of Ronald Reagan’s staff arranged an arms-for-hostages deal with Iran in an attempt to free the American hostages in Lebanon. Meanwhile, back in the Americas, Reagan was pursuing an aggressive foreign policy in response to the Cold War. The Reagan administration was doing its best to curb Communist influence in Central and Latin America. In Nicaragua, Reagan wanted to support the democratic rebel Contras against the Marxist Sandinista regime, despite legislation passed in the early 1980s, the Boland Amendment, that made federal aid to the Contras illegal. In 1985, Oliver North, a staff member in the National Security Council, devised the scheme to divert surplus funds from weapons sales with Iran to the Contra cause in Nicaragua, violating the Boland Amendment. Following public exposure of the scandal, Oliver North and many other members of Reagan’s staff were put on trial; however not a single one of them was appropriately punished. Each person involved was either pardoned, granted immunity or had convictions overturned. The Iran-Contra scandal and its aftermath exposed both the executive branch’s lack of accountability to the American people and the other branches of g...
In reality, he and his security advisor, Admiral John Poindexter, had lied to Congress, shredded evidence, and refused to inform the President of details in order to guarantee his “plausible deniability”. Ultimately, the Iran-Contra investigation raised more questions than it answered. Reagan held fast to his plea of ignorance, the full role of the CIA director remained murky, and the role of Vice President Bush remained mysterious as well. The Iran-Contra affair revealed how secretive government officials undermine the Constitution and compromise Presidential authority under the facade of patriotism.
...w the United States’ close ally Shah. Countless modernizers were persecuted, arrested and executed. In November 52 United States diplomats were held hostage by student revolutionaries who’d seized the American embassy in Tehran. America took immediate action and seized all Iranian assets. The United States attempted to negotiate. The negotiation, to the dismay of the American people dragged on for 444 days. There was a large push for President Carter to use military forces as means of negotiations; he however opted for peaceful means, which proved to be unsuccessful. Finally in April 1980 the President sanctioned a rescue mission. The attempt failed due to technical difficulties, eight men died; as a result the nation became extremely unnerved. Carter's dialogue with Iran continued throughout 1980. This was yet another failure on Carter’s part to rectify an issue.
HIV was identified as a virus causing AIDS, which resulted in an intense worldwide search for a cure from 1981 to 1984. The Iran-Contra scandal resulted in illegal arms for hostages exchange by the Reagan administration from 1985 to 1986. President Ronald Reagan unveiled the Strategic Defense Initiative, which ramped up United States development of missile defenses in 1983. Gorbachev signed the INF treaty and withdrew the Soviets from Afghanistan.
There were many problems in which Carter had been blamed for, especially the Iran hostage crisis which proved to be very humiliating. He failed to deal with any of these situations. Either as hesitant or ineffective is how many Americans viewed Carter. He also had attacked Reagan as a dangerous radical after he defeated Tom Kennedy for the nomination. For his part Reagan, the charismatic ex-Governor of California, repeatedly made fun of Carter's powerlessness , and won a landside victory that carried the United States Senate for the first time in 28 years. Reagan's victory marked the beginning of the "Reagan Revolution."
“Just as the Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev and Chinese leader Mao reinforced armed revolutions against colonial or U.S.-aligned states, American power would now reassure and upkeep rebels against communist states” (“The Reagan Doctrine”, and for some of the rebels who were rendering efforts, with the aid of the U.S., to banish the Soviet supported regimes in their individual nations. The practical implementation of some of the policies of the doctrine prompted confusion in the U.S. political dominion itself. If one would examine, to turn the doctrine’s theory into practice Reagan allowed the sale of weapons to Iran, and the profit of such trade was meant to provide monetary aid to the contras – the anti-Sandinista rebels who were secretly trained by the U.S. Special Forces (“The Reagan Doctrine”, n.d.). Additionally, as the contras were both supported and tactically developed by the U.S. and were used against the Soviet supported regimes, the “Exposure of the Iran-Contra affair in late 1986 provoked a chief congressional examination. The scandal seriously weakened the influence of the president” (“The Reagan Doctrine”, n.d.).
hoping that this would produce a whitewash. Between May and November 1973, the investigations went on, and all the Presidents chief advisers were involved. In America, all the hearings were held in public, creating a huge scandal. The saga of the saga. Like in a court of law, all the President's advisers were.
" We were eyeball to eyeball, and I think the other fellow just blinked" (Shmoop). This
In 1987 Kuwait asked for Soviet and U.S. aid during the Iran-Iraq war in the Persian Gulf. The last two years of Reagan's presidency were marred by a political scandal, which badly damaged his reputation as an honest person and committed to principle. The scandal was that the U.S. had secretly sold weapons to Iran and had diverted the profits from the sale to help the contras. Reagan denied the allegations. There was also said to be a law saying that the U.S. couldn't aid the contras. This revealed to be true and Reagan lost his image.
This scandal caused President Nixon to attend court and resign. This was a major piece to the distrust in the United States government. Additionally, the book says, “Much of the antigovernment mood that prevailed in the United States from the 1970s through the end of the century can be traced directly to the Watergate and subsequent presidential scandals and attempted cover-ups” (337). With each scandal with the American Presidents caused more and more distrust overall. However, the Watergate scandal was one of the biggest scandals. One piece of evidence is, “Indeed, Watergate sank so deeply into the public consciousness that subsequent scandals were often given nicknames that involved the suffix -gate, such as Irangate” (337). This scandal was too major to just be brushed aside by the American people. The American people may use that suffix to show that they are still not truly over the entire situation with Nixon and the Watergate scandal that involved some of the government officials in his
The Iran Hostage Crisis was a very important event that impacted America in many ways and destroyed our relationship with Iran. The consequences of this event are still felt today and continue to our foreign policies toward Iran. Throughout the 20th century, the United States tried to control Iran to ensure the exportation of oil to America. Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi came to power in 1941 and became allies with the United States. However, in the 1950s, Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh began to gain political power.
By the early 1960’s the U.S. had cut off ties with Cuba and was engaging to overthrow the Castro regime. In 1961 the Bay of Pigs Invasion, a fumbled CIA attempt to crush the government, inflamed
It has been three weeks sense the incident where the White House kidnapping occurred. The First Lady is still being held hostage; hopefully she is not dead. This, in my opinion, is absolutely ridiculous that they think their only solution was to kidnap the First Lady! After that monstrosity, the people of North Carolina decided to rise and make a group against the BBCF (Bring Back Communication for the Future). Boy, did they make tensions increase! Instead of people striking outside of the Governor’s house, they were trying to break into his house to persuade him to join the group trying to get rid of the BBCF. The governor made no appearance. Actually, they had no clue if he was even at his house.