Thomas Nast: Revolutionizing Illustrations in Media

1500 Words3 Pages

“An illustration is a visual editorial - it 's just as nuanced. ” or at least Charles M. Blow says. In all actuality, what would the world be without illustrations? As ironic as it may sound, the world would be flat without 2-dimensional illustrations. Illustrations bring more context to the world around us as styles and aesthetic expectations evolve. From cave paintings to Google’s Material Design, humanity has made many innovations in art and design. Thomas Nast deserves a spot in history for his contributions to aesthetic progress. Thomas Nast has made the world a much more aesthetically pleasing world with his revolution to integrate illustrations in media. His revolution ultimately created a more ethical world with his opposition against …show more content…

True, he may not be the inventor of pen and paper and he is certainly not the first to make caricatures. His techniques were fairly common at the time with the brush and ink wash technique. He was inspired by some illustrators like John Tenniel to adopt new styles according to Paine (135-6). In fact, he did not create many of the icons in politics today. All he has done is popularize them in the American culture. The Democratic donkey or Uncle Sam were not created by Nast (Dewey 14-8), but he has made them commonplace. Even though he did not invent some of the caricatures we see today, is it not an achievement to make those icons memorable? Is not the fame of the piece just as important as how the piece actually stands artistically? To turn relatively unnoticed pieces and symbols into the cornerstone of politics is an achievement in itself. Not to imply that fame is in direct correlation to artistic value, but while it is a shame that many artists never come to light, the ones that do change the way one would see the world. The artist has made the public look inside the eyes of the artist. It is a shame to know that one would never see through the eyes of many artists, but one can see through the “Father of the American Cartoon” who created the depictions of the Republican Party and one can also see through the eyes of the forgotten …show more content…

It is worth noting that his integration of symbols in American politics goes hand-in-hand with media. While politics and media have a collaborative relationship, it is worth noting that the elephant of the Republican Party and even the modern representation of Santa Claus according to Bruce D. Forbes (89) have been integrated with media. As previously mentioned, Thomas Nast has made politics a more tangible concept for the American public. However, if the American public can keep the vision of a fat man in a red suit alive for a couple of centuries for the sole purpose of the free market, this just goes to show his profound impact when the mere icons are plastered in the minds of adults and children alike long after his death. This legacy allows for the American Public to visualize the dynamics of the world, no matter how abstract the idea is. A mysterious man delivering presents around the world? The Republican Party? How does one even materialize that idea? How does one tangibly think about a political party? The personification of these abstract ideas makes it so that individuals can reciprocate and contribute to society. Perhaps, one thinks of a political party as a mass of individuals, but Thomas Nast has personified political parties for a much more dynamic political sphere because his personification makes the idea much more

Open Document