Intruder In The Dust Analysis

1060 Words3 Pages

Intruder in the Dust by William Faulkner followed the adventures of Chick Malison and his companions as they proved the innocence of Lucas Beauchamp, a black man accused of murder. The novel, first published in 1948, the adapted into film a year later as the fight for racial justice was beginning to strengthen heavily in the United States. Faulkner used Intruder in the Dust as a way to highlight racial injustice and the issues it bore on humanity. Some of the issues that both the book and movie addressed were a white society unable to view blacks as their equals, stereotypes of what black should have been, and standing for injustice despite skin color.
The book and movie began in the town square where white men had gathered to watch Sheriff …show more content…

Blacks and whites viewed Lucas as an "uppity nigger". When Lucas would come to town for business on the weekends, he would dress in a black suit with a crisp white shirt, pistol on his side and, a gold toothpick in his mouth. He was better- off than the typical black person in this town, and his demeanor always reminded white people of his wealth and property. In the movie, Chick openly made the statement that the Gowries "are going to make a nigger for once out of his life" ( Brown & Maddow, 1949). Faulkner (1948) also presents Chick initial feelings of Lucas as those of distaste in the book when he says "... He 's got to admit he 's a nigger) (p. 18). The attitude that Lucas portrayed is probably another reason why the town was so quick to pass judgment on him, as …show more content…

The movie did not do a good job showing this, but Faulkner did an excellent job explaining the racial injustice displayed by the town’s people. Faulkner recreated the initial town square scene from Chapter One. Although, this time, the white men were rushing away from square ashamed not because they falsely accused Lucas, but because they openly made a mistake against a black man and they did not want or could not admit to what had taken place. He also stated that the whites were ashamed to admit to their wrongdoings, referring to Crawford Gowrie killing his younger brother Vinson Gowrie. The author used Lawyer Stevens to expound upon his thoughts on racial injustice when he explained the town 's action to Chick. Stevens statement was, " They reached the point where there was nothing left for them to do but admit that they were wrong. So they ran home" (Faulkner, 1948, p. 192). The conversation between Stevens and Chick is yet another awakening moment for both of them. This moment explained that regardless of race people must always fight for justice and that alone could lead to

Open Document