Into The Wild, By Jon Krakauer: Character Analysis

836 Words2 Pages

There are a few number of people in this world that are fit for survival on the road. This is a tough and grueling lifestyle that is only meant for the strong willed. It is definitely not intended for everyone. In the book, Into the Wild, written by Jon Krakauer; a young man by the name of Christopher McCandless makes a daring decision that turns out to be mistake in the long run. After graduating from Emory University, McCandless had made a conscious decision to dispose of all his possessions, donated all of his $24,000 in his account to charity, and left his family to explore the wilderness of Alaska. His main objective was to get away from society, and to spend time with nature. But, was it all really worth it? I do not believe it was. Yes …show more content…

Move around, be nomadic.” (57) The advice given to Ron Franz by McCandless is basically preaching to Ron that he needs to go out and explore. He's saying to not just be another boring person who conforms to society, but to live life taking risks and trying something new every day. McCandless is a type of person who wants to make the most out of his life and not look back and say I should’ve done this or I should’ve done that. Not everyone in the world is like that. In fact there are very few people who live life like this. The advice given to Ron Franz is without a doubt intended for only certain type of people. It does not apply to everyone. It is for those who seek adventure and will take that to extreme measures. Not many people are willing to do that because there are many disadvantages of being on the road. For example, you are alone. You have no one else to help you. This means you have to get food on your own, find a shelter on your own, as well as find transportation on your own. In McCandless’s case, he burned all of his money and abandoned his car. He was limited on the necessary items he needed to survive. If you go into the wild lacking the essential matter you need to stay alive, more likely than not, you will not make it out alive. It’s almost physically impossible. And that goes with anyone who decides to do that. McCandless had made that choice on his own and he suffered the consequences. So that leads us back to the …show more content…

“It is the experiences, the memories, the great triumphant joy of living to the fullest extent in which real meaning is found.” (37) What McCandless found during his travels and what is being expressed in the quote is that the things that you experience in life are ultimately what causes true happiness. That was the whole purpose of why he decided to go out on his own. Because he believed that you wouldn’t be able to find happiness from the material objects, you discover it by learning the things that bring you joy from the experiences that you have encountered. Being able to be independent and having no one tell you what to do all the time is a big advantage of being alone. For example, the first time you leave your parents house and go off on your own to rent an apartment or something of that nature, that feeling of freedom and being independent is the same feeling that McCandless probably felt being on his own. Not having to abide to society’s rules and marching to the beat of your own drum must have been a great advantage for McCandless. It allowed him to experience the freedom that he's always looked for in his life, while building the opportunity to create change for

Open Document