More handpicked essays just for you.
External locus of control
External locus of control
Sue and Sue (2003) describe the different forms that external locus of control can take. It includes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: External locus of control
This assessment is intended to determine how people perceive the control that they have over their own life and destinies. A person will have either an internal locus of control or an external locus of control and can have varying degrees of either. A person can also have a balance between the two measures. Someone possessing an internal locus of control believe that they have more personal control over their destinies and people with an external locus of control believe outside forces have more control over their destinies. I scored a 0 indicating that I have a high internal locus of control to the most extreme level. This indicates that I must believe that I have total control over my destiny in all aspects. The implications and rationality
So when at work or at a party you have to ultimately make a choice. At work, you can choose to do poorly because you think your work will be overlooked resulting in an external locus of control or work hard because you think you determine the results of your work, which is an internal locus of control. Same situation different scenario, with your personal life. For example, you can choose to be quiet and talk to no one at a party because they choose to be alone. They make a difference by sparking up a conversation with someone they know or someone
Perhaps one of the most profound needs of humans is having control. Control gives not only satisfaction but also a sense of relief that things are going to go the way one has planned. In the evolutionary perspective, having a control for one’s environment results to better survivability. The loss of control on the other hand provides a cramped stress to gain control. It proves to be one of the needs that certainly ranks in the top of the hierarchy. Shakespeare’s play, Macbeth, and Steven Galloway’s The Cellist of Sarajevo, shows the human struggle for control and what they would do to grasp it. Both literary pieces show that inclination towards having control. Humans, although impossible, have an inner desire to control everything.
Self-control is a topic and concept argued frequently in the psychological world. Some believe that self-control is an innate feature of human kind, while others, like Baumeister, believe it is a characteristic that can be practiced and strengthened. Baumeister’s model of willpower describes self-control as a muscle that can be depleted and replenished, just as any other muscle in the body. What is self-control exactly? Well, Freud was a psychologist who believed that personality is a biological component of ones-self,...
It is a multidimensional human condition and constant human experience with the reduced ability to protect oneself (Cousley, Martin, & Hoy, 2014). Bailey (2010) describes vulnerability as an internal conflict which brings feelings of hopelessness, helplessness and lack of control. Vulnerability as defined by Scanlon & Lee (2006) can be broken into three dimensions, physical, social, and psychological aspects. Physical vulnerability can be identified by the potential risk of harm in the environment. Social vulnerability include age, sex, and ethnicity. Psychological vulnerability refers to the feelings associated with the loss of control and can be manifested by stress and anxiety. Vulnerability can be measured by the potential harm and the capacity to overcome it, as stated by Spiers (2000). Only the person experiencing vulnerability can truly understand its implications as it is a unique and individualized experience. (Thorup, Rundqvist, Roberts & Delmar, 2012). Vulnerability can be better understood by examining the external and internal risk factors that increase an individual’s
It is important for us humans to know that we must take full responsibility for our actions and maturely deal with any consequences that those actions may lead to. According to Ryon and Gleason (2013), “the first conceptualization of control was developed in 1966 by Rotter,” which is currently referred to as locus of control. Rotter defined locus of control as “the degree to which an individual expects that a contingent relationship exists between one’s behaviors and outcomes” (Ryon & Gleason, 2013). Fournier and Jeanrie reference Rotter’s study by explaining the two types of locus of control: “external control” and “internal control” (as cited in Rotter, 1966, p. 1). The purpose of Rotter’s theory was to examine “what causes reinforcement” whether it be an intrinsic or extrinsic factor (Kormanik & Rocco, 2009). Rotter measured “people’s general control expectancies” by using what is known as the “Internal-External Locus of Control Scale” (Fournier & Jeanrie, 2003).
Every person has wondered about something - whether it be a person, place, thing, law, or anything that someone can think about. They ask questions both rhetorical and actual to themselves, and usually make it a mission to answer these questions. Some of the biggest questions have something to do with culture and religion. One of the most major questions of all time - to what extent does an individual have control over the outcome of his or her life? There are many different opinions on this topic.
In summary, the idea of self-reliance will continue to bewilder the minds of our current and future generations. In fact, this is due to the lack of a definite answer to the question. Nevertheless, I am persuaded that whether an individual be a believer or non-believer in having control of their destiny, there are forces or uncontrollable factors in life that have the ability to control a minute percentage of one’s destiny.
Smith, P., Trompenaars, F. and Dugan, S. (1995). The Rotter locus of control scale in 43 countries: A test of cultural relativity. International Journal of Psychology, 30(3), pp.377--400
own need to control specific life events and the difficulty in the reality of act...
One famous psychology scientist that goes by the name of, Julian Rotter, studied influential behavior and he proposed that individuals differ a great deal in terms of where they place the responsibility that happens to them (Hock 190). Rotter’s findings concluded that people either have an external or internal locus of control for placing responsibility that occurs to them. External locus of control is indicated when when people interpret consequences of their behavior to be controlled by luck, fate, or powerful others (190). One person from the movie young at heart that demonstrates a high external locus of control is Joe. In the hospital, Joe told Bob Cilman, “The lord knows how long your going to be here” (Walker & George, 2007). This is external because outside forces such as the lord, or god, play a
There are many factors in life that people do have control over, however there is also some things that we don’t have control over. As citizens, we don’t have control over what the government does and how they go about doing their business. Although, we do have control over the choices we make. It’s a choice of every individual whether or not to do drugs or drink alcohol. We have the decision to give in or resist the urge. Sure others can influence us to do one or the other but in the end; one has to make the decision. Romeo and Juliet did not have control over some of the differences that separated them and led to their tragedy such as their family’s hatred for each other, or the way they felt for each other and love compared to their parents, but they did have control over the way they went about their love compared to everyone else in the tragedy.
As an example of that, if a person had a lack of control on his/her actions, that would usually imply that person may not be responsible for their attitudes and actions, instead of justifying their actions by thinking about their situation at that moment. As such, most of the time people are motivated to make the impact of situational factors on human behavior less important to protect the general notion of personal
Ever thought about who controls the decisions you make regarding your daily activities? You may think you control every aspect of your life, but some philosophers have questioned such notions. Many schools of thought explain the analogy of free will, and they present the argument of whether we have the freedom to act or other causes and effects determine our destiny. Free will in this context is defined as the freedom to choose and act where there several alternative courses of action. Theologically, the concept of free will is presented as the power to make decisions on our own without necessarily been influenced by external or predetermined courses.
Freedom, or the concept of free will seems to be an elusive theory, yet many of us believe in it implicitly. On the opposite end of the spectrum of philosophical theories regarding freedom is determinism, which poses a direct threat to human free will. If outside forces of which I have no control over influence everything I do throughout my life, I cannot say I am a free agent and the author of my own actions. Since I have neither the power to change the laws of nature, nor to change the past, I am unable to attribute freedom of choice to myself. However, understanding the meaning of free will is necessary in order to decide whether or not it exists (Orloff, 2002).
As was stated, the nature of humans is to want to feel like one is in control of him/herself and where his/her decisions will lead him/her in life. We like to believe that we aren't influenced when making decisions, but, after discussing the topic of what influences our decisions in class, I realized that most of our decisions are influenced, in some way or another, by our peers, our family, television, movies, music, teachers, and so forth.