Internal Conflict In The Crucible By Arthur Miller

553 Words2 Pages

The Crucible Arthur Miller’s The Crucible, written in 1953, was based off of a real witch trial that happened in Salem, Massachusetts in 1692. The play shows how the simple internal conflict many of the characters faces of telling the truth or lying to the court can escalate to bigger issues. It’s safe to assume because the puritans value their religion, lying was not acceptable and would be looked at as a sin. We can relate this to modern findings of Trump possibly being linked to Russia during the election, and how lying can only lead to bad credibility and distrust rather than a personal gain. As the play advances, we realize the protagonist, Abigail, is lying to the court room. She has committed multiple unforgivable crimes such as adultery, and wishing bad on others in order to achieve something herself. She wishes that Goody Proctor be put to death in hopes John will accept her into Elizabeth’s place. Abigail’s opinion of Goody Proctor is that she is a “gossiping liar” however it is clear that she is actually a truthful person, not worthy of death (Miller 145) . Abigail is facing an internal conflict because while she knows that confessing to adultery and possibly which craft is the right thing to do yet she still threatens everyone to not give away the real story of what happened that …show more content…

Out of all the girls Mary was closest to cracking. Mary is convinced to testify that she “never saw Satan” even though it’s believable she has seen Satin or different evil creatures (Miller 191). Mary’s instability caused extreme harm to her mental health and how she went about day to day life. She was one of the only girls to realize that the truth could get her in trouble but could also save her life. In the end she lets the peer pressure from Abigail get the best of her even when the truth could’ve had much lower grade

Open Document