Inhumanity In Shirley Jackson's The Lottery

1060 Words3 Pages

When lotteries come around, people think of good things that happen to them. People believe that winning a lottery can mean hitting the big bucks, winning a car, or even just living a happy life as long as they live. According to Merriam-Webster’s online dictionary, the true definition of a lottery is, “a system used to decide who will get or be given something by choosing names or numbers by chance.” In the case of literary icon, Shirley Jackson’s this system was anything but lucky. “The Lottery” is a short story in which people draw to see who is going to get pelted with rocks and stones. This is done every year to ensure a good growing season. Exploring the mind and reasoning of why Shirley Jackson wrote this story was a tough challenge; …show more content…

Before being published, many publishers rejected the story due to it’s amount of barbarism and unsocial like conduct. A numerous amount of critics have wondered why did Jackson write this very visual and thought provoking story. Don D’Ammassa pinpointed, “When "The Lottery" was first published in The New Yorker, it generated much controversy and hate mail, thereby proving the validity of its theme. Jackson later stated that the story was meant as an indictment of ‘the pointless violence and general inhumanity’ that she perceived lay under the veneer of everyday life in America.” (D’Ammassa 130). After reading this critical source, I agree with D’Ammassa one-hundred percent. Jackson did not intend for this to get out of control like it did; however, she meant what she wanted the theme to mean. Being in America all of my life, I have seen the “pointless violence and general inhumanity” that comes from video games, movies, and even everyday social encounters. Jackson had a point to prove about society and D’Ammassa helped literary analyst to see her point of view and not just from the …show more content…

From my understanding, it becomes clear to me that it is nothing but uncivilization. Two critics have both stated what they think their take is on the theme. David Michelson argues, “... demonstrates the complex potentialities of humans' moral nature, and shows that such issues are not easily resolved even though they are recurrent problems we all face as individual agents living in a social world.” (Michelson). Phillip Taylor argues his point that tradition is the main theme of this story. “While tradition is commonly thought of positively as social glue that holds families and communities together, Shirley Jackson's story offers a dark reminder of the dangers of following traditional practices uncritically.” (Taylor). This means that there is a danger in “blindly” following a tradition in which no one speaks up about it. Every year this happens to an innocent soul and no one ever has the audacity to speak up about it. To me this just does not make sense of why no one does. Maybe it could be that they could be ruled as an outcast and get subject to the lottery. No one speaks up about it until you are chosen to die just like Tessie did. Both critics are right in their points. They argue what they believe the main theme is and then stick it with solid evidence from the

Open Document