In a society where people depend heavily on technology and media, a good part of our decisions and opinions are shaped by the media around us. The media have shaped many public political decisions and even swayed elections in ways that we never would have predicted. Citizens come to know about political situations and governmental issues primarily through various media such as televisions, blogs on the Internet and newspapers etc. These types of media have influenced thousands of individuals to think in a certain way when it comes to political decision-making and they shape the citizens’ viewpoint by simply covering only carefully selected stories and even only one side of the certain story, the side that is most beneficial for the media companies. This is also called agenda setting. The media “thinks” for the people and is successful in making people aware of what issues to focus on which ones to disregard.
Framing is also another tactic that the media uses to shape public opinion. This is the ability the media has to influence the way citizens interpret political settings. The media has the power to make any political candidate either popular or unpopular. This approach is called priming. When the media channels find a candidate that they think would bring them a lot of attention, the media decides to support them. This they call, the candidate having “momentum”. An example of this would be, the media announcing that Barack Obama has “momentum” during the 2008 elections. This made him popular and increased his voter turnout by a considerable number. Norton, (2012).
There are two types of media that influences the political field. One is paid media and the other is free media. When a candidate pays for his/her own campaigns, ad...
... middle of paper ...
...lating only one side of the story (the side which is most popular), covering what issues are most important at the time and making the public concentrate on only what only the media wants them to concentrate on. The most common ways the public gets their information during election time from are the television, newspapers and the radio. The candidates use these media to promote their campaigns. There are two types of media available to them, paid and free media. Paid media is when candidates use their personal funding to air advertisements on TV, Radio newspapers and print fliers. Although this media is quite popular, the more effective ways to get the message across is by free media. President Bill Clinton used both of these media very efficiently. Studies have been carried out to observe the effect television and newspaper have influenced the way citizens think.
Through the process in which the media chooses which stories they decide to cover sets the agenda for what is considered newsworthy and important (Boundless, "The Mass Media"). The ultimate shaping of public opinion is through the decision of what stories are covered the media, because the media can legitimize or marginalize either the entire story or parts of it (Smith, "Agenda-Setting, Priming & Framing"). The public believes in the media, so when the media decides to cover one story over another they are deciding what the public should be thinking about. As Briggs and Burke explain through Innis’s theory that “each medium of communication tends to create a monopoly on knowledge” which in turn for those ruling the monopoly produces a profit and set the public agenda (Briggs and Burke, 6). Similarly to the intellectual monopoly of medieval monks based on parchment, there is a monopoly on traditional media today; six people own 90% of the media that is viewed (McCarty). Ultimately, these six people have been deciding what is considered newsworthy which in effect determines what the public thinks about (Boundless, "The Mass Media"). Through the decisions of what is considered newsworthy, viewers also decide their opinion based off of social desirability or what they perceive the popular opinion to be which is all derived from the media and what they consider important (Boundless,
Media concentration allows news reporters to fall victim to source bias, commercial impulse, and pack journalism. Together, all three of the aforementioned factors become known as horse race journalism, a cause for great concern in campaign media. In complying with horse race journalism, media outlets exclude third party candidates, reinforce the idea that politics is merely a game, and dismiss issues that directly affect voters and their day to day lives. Through horse race journalism, the media is mobilized in impeding an active form of the democratic debate in American politics. Even across the wide range of human values and beliefs, it is easy to see that campaign media coverage must be changed, if not for us, then for our children. It is imperative that we discern the flaws of the media and follow our civic duty to demand better media
The media is actually used as a channel of disseminating information to the audience. And the media influence cultural, moral, political, economic and religious values because they tend to set the agenda for its audience. Not only setting the agenda but also framing. The media tend to frame the central organizing ideas for news content, entertainment, which supplies a context and suggests what the issue is through the use of selection, emphasis exclusion and elaboration.
The two key terms “agenda setting” and “gotcha” journalism are going to be used within this paper to show you how politicians and news organizations try to persuade the public. The “agenda setting” is a term that “involves using the news to influence what the public regards as important for them to think about in society and politics.” (Bennett, Lance pg. 23) This is a major tool for news organizations or politicians to seek a public relation toward a certain aspect that they’re addressing their agenda and framing it to formulate their partisan viewpoints. Now for “gotcha” jour...
As the mind matures and grows, new opinions are formed with the help of the revolutionizing consciousness of humanity. The human conscious allows humanity to develop individually and gain unique cognitive patterns and thinking processes. However, these opinions can be manipulated by environmental sources, like the media. The media’s puppet strings can be used to influence the minds of the masses and control their overall thinking process. It takes away an individual’s freedom to think for themselves and form their own opinions. Manipulation is a key ingredient in attaining support for a side of an argument. News networks have this ability to twist the minds of their listeners and unconsciously force them to believe in their words. Two of the
Lynda Lee Kaid offers insight into political advertising across North America, as well as other nations around the world in her article Political Advertising as Political Marketing: A Retro-forward Perspective. Noting that political advertising is crucial in democracies today, Kaid outlines several aspects of political advertising. Although Kaid offers a multitude of claims regarding political advertising, she fails narrow in on a specific method, as well as neglects to provide statistics of why particular methods are effective. Due to extensive examples and lack of statistics Kaid's argument is weak.
398).It is also stated that news divisions reduced their costs, and raised the entertainment factor of the broadcasts put on air. (p. 400). Secondly, the media determines its sources for stories by putting the best journalists on the case and assign them to areas where news worthy stories just emanates. (p.400). Third, the media decides how to present the news by taking the most controversial or relevant events and compressing them into 30 second sound-bites. (p.402). finally, the authors also explain how the media affects the general public. The authors’ state “The effect of one news story on public opinion may be trivial but the cumulative effect of dozens of news stories may be important. This shows a direct correlation between public opinions and what the media may find “relevant”. (Edwards, Wattenberg, Lineberry, 2015, p.
The media takes a biased approach on the news that they cover, giving their audience an incomplete view of what had actually happened in a story. Most people believe that they are not “being propagandized or being in some way manipulated” into thinking a certain way or hearing certain “truths” told by their favorite media outlets (Greenwald 827). In reality, everyone is susceptible to suggestion as emphasized in the article “Limiting Democracy: The American Media’s World View, and Ours.” The
Rather than being a neutral conduit for the communication of information, the U.S. media plays an intricate role in shaping and controlling political opinions. Media is extremely powerful in the sense that without an adequate functioning media, it is virtually impossible for a sophisticated social structure like the U.S. Government to exist. Henceforth, all known sophisticated social structure, have always dependent upon the media’s ability to socialize. The U.S. government generally will exploit the media, often times manipulating the enormous power of the printed word. Ultimately empowering the U.S. government, strengthening it with the ability to determine and control the popular perception of reality. One way in which government achieves this objective, is by its ability to misuse the media’s ability to set the agenda. Contrary to popular belief, media is in fact an enormous hegemony. In fact, separate independent news organizations relatively do not exist. Rather than creating an independent structured agenda of there own, generally lesser smaller news organizations adapt to a prepared agenda, previously constructed by a higher medium. Based upon this information alone, it is quite apparent that media functions in adherence to the characteristics of a hierarchy. This simply means that media is structured in a way that it operates functioning from top to bottom. This is also identical to the hierarchical nature of the human body, in that from the commands of the brain transferred through the central nervous system, the body responds accordingly. In order for the U.S. government to control and determine the public’s popular perception of reality, the government must shape and oversee the information that the media reports to the existing populous. This particular process of democracy is known and referred to by political scientists as cognitive socialization. However, many of us, who do not adhere to the cushioning of political correctness, refer to it as the propaganda machine. Numerous political scientists consider cognitive socialization to be the most effective form of political socialization. According to theory, cognitive socialization is doctored up information, which is strategically fragmented in such a manipulative manner, that the probability of its rationalization is highly predictable. The manipulative properties of cognitive socialization are so diabolical and Machiavellian in nature, that I consider it to be the ultimate perversion of the democratic process. In all seriousness, numerous intellectuals, and gentleman held in good stature agree, that cognitive socialization is the product of an evil genius.
There for we say yes, media can have a sizeable political impact, especially when a politician controls a substantial share of the media. Media is therefore bad for democracy. Stated throughout this paper is the level of bias that is displayed in the media. This level of bias sways the public far right or far left. Their decisions are based on a political point of view.
The mechanisms of the media and political institutions shape public consciousness and mainstream
The media is sometimes called the “Fourth Estate” because of its influence in shaping the course of politics and public opinion. Some people are influenced by what they read or hear and others are not. There is a well-known psychological process called selective attention. Wilson, Dilulio, and Bose define it as “paying attention only to those news stories with which one already agrees.” (290)
McCombs and Shaw fully developed the theory of agenda setting in respect to public agenda in a study in the early 1970’s. Their cross-sectional study involved the effects of media agenda setting on public opinion. They revealed that there were indeed correlations between the two, which backed the ideas of Cohen (Brosius 5). They derived that, “the basic agenda-setting hypothesis asserts that the issues and information presented on the media agenda become over time the issues and information on the public agenda (Leckenby).
The current role of mass media in politics has definitely played a significant role in how view and react to certain events and issues of the nation. Newspapers, magazines, television and radio are some of the ways information is passed onto many of the citizens. The World Wide Web is also an information superhighway, but not all of the sources on the Internet are credible. Therefore, I will only focus on the main three types of media: written, viewed, and audible, and how they affect whether or not democracy is being upheld in the land of the free. The media includes several different outlets through which people can receive information on politics, such as radio, television, advertising and mailings. When campaigning, politicians spend large quantities of money on media to reach voters, concentrating on voters who are undecided. Politicians may use television commercials, advertisements or mailings to point out potentially negative qualities in their opponents while extolling their own virtues. The media can also influence politics by deciding what news the public needs to hear. Often, there are more potential news stories available to the media than time or space to devote to them, so the media chooses the stories that are the most important and the most sensational for the public to hear. This choice can often be shaped,
...r attention on selected issues on which the public will form opinions on (McCombs). Framing is an important factor by allowing the media to select certain aspects about the problem and then make them appear more important in the text, which results in enhancing the meaning or interpretation of the situation (Scheufele). Last, but not least, priming also played an important role in shaping public opinion. Priming works as the media repeatedly exposed certain issues in the public viewers. The more exposure an issue gets, the more likely an individual will recall or retain the information in their minds. With these three factors played out systemically the media, our opinions are constantly being influence and shape by them. As quoted by Walter Lippman, “what we know about the world is largely based on what the media decide to tell us” (McCombs).