Inescapable Reality In A Streetcar Named Desire By Tennessee Williams

1136 Words3 Pages

“纸包不住火” [zhǐ bāo bú zhù huǒ] is a well known Chinese idiom used to express the inevitable revelation of the truth. The phrase literally translated to English means “paper cannot wrap fire.” This inescapable reality is demonstrated in A Streetcar Named Desire by Tennessee Williams. The drama encompasses around a vulnerable woman in her mid-20s struggling to escape her haunting past. Her name, Blanche DuBois, means “white wood.” Ironically, she is anything but what her name suggests. Blanche is past her spring and is far from pure and innocent. She flees to her sister’s home in hope of finding some peace but instead gets involved with her aggressive brother-in-law, Stanley Kowalski. Throughout the play, she attempts to create a perfect illusion …show more content…

Unfortunately, her dream was shattered by her dominant and sexually driven brother-in-law. This passage serves to address the revelation of the protagonist’s phony facade. Williams utilizes dramatic irony, stage direction, and dialogue to depict the unravelment of her character. Through the incorporation of dramatic irony, Williams divulges the truth behind Blanche’s charade. As Stanley begins to question about her past romantic involvements, Blanche is quick to fabricate a tale. Her lies slowly gravitate toward depicting herself as the ideal woman. She describes, “But the beauty of / the mind and richness of the spirit and tenderness of the / heart– and I have all of those things” (12-14). Blanche is none of which she claims. She is a woman who struggles to escape her past and fears to be in the light. In addition, she is not physically nor realistically rich in spirit; her past left her in pieces. The audience is aware of her grapple to overcome her ex-husband’s suicide and the usual sound of a gunshot that is heard at the mention of his death. At the present, she attempts to use …show more content…

During their conversation, Stanley deliberately asks questions to force her to admit to the truth. He intentionally asks about their initial topic after her lengthy response. Blanche confusedly replies, “What telegram? No! No, after! As a matter of fact, the / wire came just as–” (40-41). In her effort to conceal the truth, Blanche’s fabrication stretches to great length. As a result, her intentions backfire and draws a hole in her lies which further strengthens Stanley’s allegation of the truth. Blanche panics as she is unprepared for this direct confrontation with Stanley. She was always able to manipulate men with her scandalous behavior, but it fails and puts her in a tough situation. Dialogue aids in the revelation of the truth by exposing Blanche’s poor attempt to conceal her past. Towards the end of their conversation, Stanley realizes that she will not tell him the truth. He confronts her and claims, “I’ve been on to you from the start! No once did you pull / any wool over this boy’s eyes!” (56-57). Stanley is fed up with Blanche’s shoddy attempt to hide her past identity. He observes Blanche as she foolishly concocts false tales to present to him and patiently waits as she makes her stories more elaborate and ridiculous. Blance refuses to admit to the truth as it will bring out her past that she desperately tries to escape. Dialogue reveals Blanche’s inability to prevent Stanley from

Open Document