Inequalities In Ancient Egypt

1049 Words3 Pages

Throughout history, many species needed to be guided by a leader. Those leaders have to make the decision for everyone. Whether it’s good or bad, the followers will have to pay the price. Those leaders treated some better than other’s which created a gap of inequality. Egypt is one of the most historical countries that kept being led by leader known as pharaoh. Today, that title has been moderated to president. Trough time, Egyptians were led by dishonest leaders who brought misery to the country. These corrupted leaders make the relationship between the Egyptians followers live unequally? In my opinion it does because if they do make a mistake, the followers will have to pay the price.

To begin, Hosni Mubarak triggered inequality in the …show more content…

After Mubarak Fall, the military started governing the state. They promised that changes would occurs but the only change that did happened was changed of governor which is a small fraction of the picture. In the bigger picture, the regime that Mubarak made was still standing. Those who were able to see the entire picture revolted for the second time a The square demanding change but not everyone was agreeing since they do not see what other see. In the end the rebellion was a failure since this time the regime to action. They took action against their human right by invading The Square with thugs and police. Some were arrested and brought to unknown location to brutally get tortured. Torturing people will not solve any problem instead it will provoke more people. In fall 2011, there was another rebellion happened with fewer people. As we know there were two brotherhoods that kept revolting against the system. The Muslim and the Christians which treated another equally until this rebellion in which leaders of the Muslim brotherhood started negotiating the regime. The other brotherhood kept revolting and lost many people during that event. At some point, they even got teargassed and ran over by tanks. Instead of showing these things to the world, the media only shows the good side of the regime. Not only that but the military promised the citizens that no violence would be used towards them. In this bloodshed, the …show more content…

The new leader objective was to benefit the Muslim brotherhood which made the greater inequality. Rather than fix the social injustice that his followers lived for decade, he gave himself special authority which Mubarak would never think of doing. In August, he cancelled the SCAF's constitutional declaration. He also forced defense minister and SCAF chairman Hussein Tantawi to retire, along with his deputy, Sam Enan. Some 70 top military generals followed them out to pasture. Morsi had stood up to the most powerful institution in Egypt and prevailed. At the end of 2012, Morsi triggered another rebellion by his decree on a new constitution which will immune him to all juridical laws. As he tries to get the title of pharaoh rebellion burst at the Tahrir Square. The result were obvious, around 90% of the population are in the Muslim brotherhood and the minority who are the Christians and exiled Muslims are the pillars of justice who reject the constitution. At the start of 2013, Morsi was treated as a pharaoh.At his anniversary of presidency, the nation regroups at the symbol of peace, the square to remove once again a corrupt leader. A petition of over 22milions citizens was signed to remove Morsi. Eventually, the symbol of inequality was once again

Open Document