Introduction Identification of a child with a learning disability can be a challenging issue, especially for parents who invest heavily on a child to ensure that he/she becomes a better person in life. The story of Ryan is one such narrative that took all involved parties some time before arriving at the conclusion that Ryan was a special child. Important Information Shared by Family to Identify Ryan’s Learning Needs In the assessment of Ryan, the parent provided crucial information that led to identification of challenges that Ryan was going through. The parent spent a lot of time helping the child to complete his homework. Secondly, the parent realized that Ryan would be able to memorize a story, but reading and writing down the story was the challenge because the letters were jumbled up in a word. Ryan was showing extreme signs of frustration while at home, an aspect that he hid from his class teacher and schoolmates. Ryan was not afraid to ask the mother for help in doing homework and worked quite hard to please the mother, although inherent challenges frustrated his efforts. The family was consistently seeking to improve and motivate Ryan in his work, offering as much emotional support as they possibly could. The family did point to the case where all other students were awarded with candy while he was left out, which was a great challenge to Ryan. Ryan knew that he was talented but discharging the information appropriately on paper was the challenge. The family also motivated Ryan never to segregate himself from social events like sports. Ryan also loved sports. All these aspects were very helpful information shared by the parents because they did show that Ryan was getting the nurture and positive response from the caregi... ... middle of paper ... ... instance, Ryan and the teacher came up with a signaling cue that was unique to both parties. Whenever Ryan needed assistance, he would signal without arousing the attention of other students. Works Cited Fox, L., Carta, J., Strain, P., Dunlap, G., & Hemmeter, M. L. (2009). Response to Intervention and the Pyramid Model. Retrieved from http://www.challengingbehavior.org/do/resources/documents/rti_pyramid_web.pdf Heward, W. L. (2013). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. Hoover, J. J. (2010). Special education eligibility decision making in Response to Intervention models. Theory into Practice, 49(4), 289–296. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. Pierangelo, R. A., & Giuliani, G. A. (2013). Assessment in special education: A practical approach. (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Hehir, T. (2009). New directions in special education: Eliminating ableism in policy and practice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Response to Intervention (RtI) is a framework based off the problem solving method that integrates assessment, and targeted instruction, within a multi-tiered intervention system. Implementation of RtI in schools is crucial to identify which students need additional intervention that will help increase their literacy skills, and prevent them from falling behind. RtI is based off multi-leveled tiers that are each categorized by the intensity of the intervention that is being used. The RtI framework is also used as a valued tool in monitoring and improving student behavior in the classroom through a model known as Positive Behavioral Intervention Support (PBIS).
Hardman, M. L., Drew, C. J., & Egan, M. W. (2011). Human exceptionality: school, community, family (10th ed.). Australia: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
My mother didn’t have a perfect schedule set up for us, but she had certain expectations for me and my siblings. She expected us to go to school, and come back home. Unlike Shell 's neighborhood, we couldn’t have kids just playing outside because you never knew what was going on in the streets. We didn’t have the back and front yard available to us, but me and my siblings will find ways in which to keep ourselves entertained. We did become creative, but also coming from a lower class community there was always one sibling that was always doing more thinking than the
Sullivan, A. L. (2011). The 'Standard'. Disproportionality in Special Education: Identification and Placement of English Language Learners. Exceptional Children, 77(3), 317-334.
Soukup, J. H., Wehmeyer, M. L., Bashinski, S. M., & Bovaird, J. A. (2007). Classroom variables and access to the general curriculum for students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 74(1), 101-120.
Mulrine, Christopher F., Mary Anne Prater, and Amelia Jenkins. "The Active Classroom." Teaching Exceptional Children 40.5 (2008): 16-22. Academic Search Complete. Web. 28 Oct. 2013.
Horn, W.F. & Tynan, D. (2001) Revamping special education. Public Interest 144, 36. Retrieved November 6, 2002 from ERIC/EBSCO database.
Kaufman, Roger, and Mayer, Hanna, and Rojas, Alicia M. Needs Assessment: A User’s Guide. Educational Technology Publication: Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1993.
Allen, K. Eileen, and Ilene S. Schwartz. The Exceptional Child: Inclusion in Early Childhood Education. 7th ed. Albany, NY: Delmar, 1996. 175-206. Print.
Zumwalt, C. (2012). Authentic assessment and early childhood education—an update and Resources. Little Prints, 6(1), 1-15.
Cramer, S & Stivers, J. (2007). Don’t Give Up! Practical strategies for challenging collaborations. Teaching exceptional children, 39(6), p, 6-11.
Mazurek, K. & Winzer, M.A. (Eds.). (1994). Comparative Studies in Special Education. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
We must consider that, “there are more than 6.6 million students with disabilities in the United States public school who receive special education services, which means that there are 6.6 million Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) that have been developed, and are being implement at any given time” (Blackwell & Rossetti, 2014). The IEP “is considered a legal document
Turnbull, R., Turnbull, A., Shank, M., Smith, S.J. (2004). Exceptional Lives: Special Education in Today's Schools. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.