Individual Learning And Piaget's Theory Of Learning

2006 Words5 Pages

A couple weeks ago you asked the class if we thought we were individual or social learners. I said individual. In the moment it seemed like a lot to admit; I felt like I needed more time to evaluate myself. Since then, and thinking about it now, I realize that that that’s still true, I am an individual learner.But that’s not the basis of this paper. However, to answer the question raised, I would say that human cognition is inherently an individual process. Even if Finland, the country with the best schools, stresses outside group play instead of in class group work, Piaget’s stance that learning is an individual process makes sense. My own experiences and other assigned readings point to this conclusion.
To me, the opposing argument on the …show more content…

To learn anything at all it first has to make sense to you. I believe that there is no way to judge one’s understanding if the process of metacognition does not take place. In an article published by the Onion, a discussion on the traditional classroom group dynamics and teacher-student relationships are examined. According to the assigned reading by Steiner, one criticism of Piaget’s theory is that classrooms are social settings where there’s an exchange of information from the teacher to the student or from student to student: “The teacher and the social context of the classroom play limited roles in Piaget’s cognitive theories of development. According to social constructivists, by contrast, learning and development are social, collaborative activities”(320). With this type of exchange it is argued that individual learning can’t take place in the classroom.
Similarly, the Onion article also explains the struggles of a teacher whose students write down everything she says without question, even if the information was strange or obscure. This is not learning. If Vygotsky’s theory of socio-cultural foundations of learning fits best in a classroom setting then questions need to be raised on that side of the argument. What does this theory say in response to the passive exchange of information from teacher to

Open Document