Individual And Collective Identity In Kwame Appiah's Racial Identities

767 Words2 Pages

Kwame Appiah, author of Racial Identities, explores the complexity between individual and collective identity. Throughout the text, Appiah attempts to define these complicated notions, noting their similarities and differences. He calls upon the ideas of other philosophers and authors to help formulate his own. Essentially, individual and collective identity are very much intertwined. Appiah argues that collective identities are very much related to behavior. There is not one particular way a certain ethnic group acts, but instead “modes of behavior (Appiah 127).” These behavioral acts provide loose norms or models. However, Appiah also notes that it is how individuals essentially make or allow these collective identities to become central …show more content…

He describes that blacks are constantly being recognized in a white person 's state of mind, through a white person’s point of view, through a white person 's eyes. Appiah argues that the African American race has not be constructed within the race itself, but instead shaped by the society around them. There are no vales, practices or beliefs African Americans share. They are only understood in reference to, “the bearers of other American racial identities (Appiah 122).” This idea is central to the identity of African Americans, however it is negatively central as it “insults their dignity” and places “limitations on their autonomy” (Appiah 126). They must instead, “take the collective identity and construct positive life-scripts.” In doing so, their collective identities will no longer be a source of limitation and insult, but as a, “valuable part of what they centrally are (Appiah …show more content…

The films The Boy in the Striped Pajamas and Schindler 's List recall a dark and devastating time in history known as the Holocaust. Amid the barbaric German Nazi invasions, are where we find the main characters of these two films. The Boy in the Striped Pajamas tells the story of Bruno, a son of German Nazi soldier who befriends an inmate at a nearby concentration camp. For weeks, Bruno shares stories, food, and comforts the inmate, Shmuel, despite his parent’s orders and German upbringing. Bruno has grown up exposed to the Nazi propaganda, however his German upbringing does not create hostility or resentment toward this Jewish boy, but instead compassion. Similarly, Oskar Schindler, a German business man saved the lives of thousands of Jewish prisoners by arranging them to work in his factory. Both Oskar Schindler and Bruno did not allow neither their collective identity as Germans nor their pro-Nazi culture, to become central to their own individual identity and morals. They did not allow the constraints or “expectations of others”, in a German sense, to make them act

Open Document